The Science of Power and Persuasion
A scientific exploration of the U.S. presidency as a complex system of power, influence, and measurable functions
Explore the ResearchWhen we think of the U.S. president, we often picture a singular figure—a person giving speeches, making decisions, and shaking hands. But through a scientific lens, the presidency reveals itself as a complex system, an institution whose power, influence, and functions can be measured, analyzed, and understood.
It is a living laboratory of political power, leadership, and communication. This article explores the presidency not just as a political office, but as a subject of rigorous scientific inquiry. We will examine its constitutional DNA, quantify the daily behaviors of its occupants, and use cutting-edge "text-as-data" methods to deconstruct the very language of power. By applying the tools of science to the art of leadership, we can decode what makes this office, and the individuals who hold it, truly tick.
Analyzing the foundational design of executive power
Measuring presidential activities and time allocation
Deconstructing the language of power and persuasion
The foundation of the American presidency was a radical experiment in republican government. The Framers of the Constitution sought to create an executive branch that was energetic enough to govern effectively, but not so powerful as to become a monarchy 1 .
The president operates within a system of checks and balances from the legislative (Congress) and judicial (Supreme Court) branches. This includes the power to veto legislation, but also the requirement to seek Senate approval for treaties and appointments 1 .
A unique military role where the president leads the armed forces, a power that has expanded significantly during times of war 1 .
Instead of direct popular vote, the president is selected by this body, reflecting the Framers' initial vision of a buffer against pure majority rule 1 .
The presidency was designed as an "energetic executive" but with carefully constrained powers to prevent authoritarian rule—a balance that continues to evolve through political practice and judicial interpretation.
What does a president actually do all day? Thanks to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, we have detailed "daily diaries" that log the president's activities, often in 5-15 minute increments 9 .
Research by scholars like Terry Sullivan of the White House Transition Project has revealed striking patterns. For instance, a president's workday isn't static; it rapidly lengthens by about 10% within the first 100 days in office 9 . President Jimmy Carter, for example, started with an already grueling 17.4-hour day that stretched even further 9 .
Figure 1: Average Time Allocation of Modern Presidents (Eisenhower to George H.W. Bush) 9
Approximately 35% of a president's time is dedicated to unique constitutional responsibilities like acting as Commander-in-Chief and chief diplomat 9 .
About 31% of time is spent on legislative duties and managing the executive branch, including meetings with congressional leaders 9 .
Only 9% of time is allocated to party leadership and public communications, despite its visibility in media coverage 9 .
Surprisingly, just 1.4% of time is spent directly on economic management, with most duties delegated to advisors 9 .
Presidential workdays expand significantly during the first 100 days in office, reflecting increasing demands and responsibilities 9 .
In recent years, a revolution has been underway in political science: the treatment of text as quantitative data. This "text-as-data" approach uses advanced statistical models to extract insights from unstructured text, such as speeches 6 .
Researchers compile extensive datasets of campaign speeches, applying strict criteria to ensure consistency for valid quantitative comparison 6 .
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) examines linguistic features, discursive practices, and social context to understand power dynamics in political language .
Characterized by:
Characterized by:
In the specific socio-political context of 2024—marked by economic instability and social fragmentation—crisis-driven rhetoric proved more effective at mobilizing a broader electoral coalition .
The U.S. presidency remains one of the world's most dynamic subjects of study. By applying scientific tools—from quantitative time-allocation studies to sophisticated linguistic analysis—we move beyond speculation to a deeper, evidence-based understanding of power.
Transforming anecdotal impressions into measurable data patterns
Deconstructing the language of power and political persuasion
Viewing the presidency as an interconnected system of influences
This scientific approach reveals that the presidency is not merely a collection of individuals but a complex institution whose behaviors and impacts can be measured, modeled, and understood. As the political landscape evolves and new data emerges, the laboratory of the presidency will continue to yield fascinating insights into the enduring science of leadership and persuasion.
References will be populated separately.