AGREE Metric: The Comprehensive Guide to Greenness Assessment in Analytical Methods

Abstract

This article provides a complete resource for researchers and drug development professionals on the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric, a comprehensive tool for evaluating the environmental impact of analytical methods. Covering foundational principles, practical application, troubleshooting, and comparative validation, it guides scientists in implementing AGREE to design more sustainable analytical workflows. The content explores how AGREE, based on all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry, provides a quantitative 0-1 score and intuitive pictogram, enabling informed method selection and optimization for greener biomedical and clinical research.

Understanding AGREE: Principles and Evolution of Green Analytical Chemistry Metrics

The Need for Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) and the 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) represents a fundamental shift in analytical science, transitioning from traditional, resource-intensive methods toward sustainable practices that minimize environmental impact and enhance laboratory safety. This transformation is guided by the 12 principles of GAC, which provide a comprehensive framework for developing eco-friendly analytical procedures. The adoption of GAC is driven by the significant environmental footprint of conventional methods, which often consume large volumes of toxic solvents, generate hazardous waste, and require substantial energy. This review explores the core principles of GAC, evaluates modern greenness assessment tools like the AGREE metric, and compares the environmental performance of traditional versus green methodologies through quantitative data. By detailing innovative techniques such as miniaturization, solventless extraction, and real-time analysis, this article provides researchers and drug development professionals with a practical guide for implementing sustainable analytical protocols. The integration of green chemistry principles not only supports global sustainability goals but also offers improved efficiency, cost savings, and enhanced safety in analytical laboratories.

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a transformative discipline that integrates the principles of green chemistry into analytical methodologies, fundamentally reimagining how chemical analysis is conducted. GAC focuses specifically on mitigating the adverse effects of analytical activities on human safety, health, and the environment [1]. This represents a significant paradigm shift from traditional analytical methods, which have historically relied on large volumes of toxic solvents, generated substantial hazardous waste, and consumed vast amounts of energy [2]. The movement toward sustainability in the laboratory has evolved from a niche concern to a central tenet of scientific responsibility, driven by both ethical considerations and practical necessities.

The environmental implications of traditional analytical chemistry are substantial and multifaceted. Conventional methods typically involve milliliters or more of sample size, utilize hazardous solvents like chloroform and benzene, generate high volumes of hazardous waste, and require significant energy inputs for operations such as heating and vacuum systems [2]. These practices not only create environmental challenges through resource depletion and waste accumulation but also pose direct risks to laboratory personnel through exposure to toxic chemicals. In contrast, GAC seeks to redesign analytical workflows from sample preparation to data analysis to make them as benign as possible while maintaining the high standards of accuracy and precision required for scientific validity [3].

The foundation of GAC lies in the 12 principles of green chemistry, which provide a comprehensive framework for designing and implementing environmentally benign analytical techniques [3]. These principles emphasize waste prevention, the use of renewable feedstocks, energy efficiency, atom economy, and the avoidance of hazardous substances - all of which are central to reimagining the role of analytical chemistry in today's environmental and industrial landscape. The ultimate aim is to create analytical processes that are not only scientifically robust but also environmentally responsible, economically viable, and socially sustainable.

For researchers and drug development professionals, embracing GAC offers numerous advantages beyond environmental stewardship. Laboratories that implement sustainable practices often experience significant cost savings through reduced consumption of expensive reagents and solvents, lower waste disposal expenses, and decreased energy requirements [2]. Additionally, green methodologies frequently enhance workplace safety by minimizing exposure to hazardous materials and can improve analytical efficiency through streamlined processes and faster analysis times. As regulatory frameworks increasingly emphasize sustainability and corporate responsibility, proficiency in GAC principles becomes increasingly valuable for maintaining compliance and promoting positive public perception.

The 12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry

The framework for Green Analytical Chemistry is built upon 12 foundational principles that guide the development and implementation of sustainable analytical methods. These principles provide a systematic approach to reducing the environmental impact of chemical analysis while maintaining analytical performance. The "SIGNIFICANCE" mnemonic offers a practical way to remember and apply these principles in research and method development [4].

• S - Sample Direct Measurement: Prioritizes direct measurement techniques that eliminate or minimize sample preparation steps, thereby reducing reagent consumption and waste generation. This principle encourages the use of in-situ analysis and non-destructive testing methods that avoid the need for extensive sample manipulation.

• I - Inherently Safer Chemistry: Emphasizes the selection of reagents and solvents that are inherently less hazardous, reducing the potential for accidents, explosions, or toxic exposures. This principle focuses on preventing hazards rather than managing them after they occur.

• G - Green Solvents and Reagents: Advocates for the replacement of hazardous solvents with safer alternatives such as water, supercritical carbon dioxide, ionic liquids, or bio-based solvents [3]. This principle significantly reduces toxicity and environmental persistence associated with analytical procedures.

• N - Non-Derivatization: Promotes methods that avoid chemical derivatization, which typically requires additional reagents and generates extra waste. When derivatization is unavoidable, the principle encourages the use of minimal quantities and green alternatives.

• I - Integration of Processes: Supports the combination of multiple analytical steps into streamlined workflows, reducing overall resource consumption and analysis time. This includes techniques like online sample preparation coupled directly with analysis.

• F - Fundamental Method Development: Encourages the design of analytical methods with environmental considerations as a core parameter rather than an afterthought. This involves optimizing conditions to minimize energy and material inputs while maintaining performance.

• I - Increased Safety for Operators: Focuses on protecting laboratory personnel through reduced exposure to hazardous materials and conditions. This includes using closed systems, automation, and remote monitoring to enhance workplace safety.

• C - Calibration and Standardization with Minimal Standards: Advocates for reducing the number and volume of standards required for calibration, employing techniques like standard addition or internal standardization that require smaller quantities of reference materials.

• A - Automation and Miniaturization: Promotes the use of automated systems and miniaturized techniques to reduce reagent consumption, waste generation, and operator intervention [2]. Lab-on-a-chip technology and microfluidic devices exemplify this principle.

• N - New Technologies Implementation: Encourages the adoption of innovative approaches that offer environmental advantages, such as microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted processes, and photo-induced reactions [3].

• C - Carbon Neutral Footprint: Focuses on reducing the carbon footprint of analytical activities through energy-efficient instrumentation, renewable energy sources, and methods that operate at ambient temperature and pressure.

• E - Elimination or Reduction of Waste: Emphasizes waste prevention as the primary strategy, followed by recycling and proper treatment of unavoidable waste. This principle aligns with the broader concept of the circular economy in laboratory operations.

Table 1: The 12 SIGNIFICANCE Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry

Principle	Key Focus	Implementation Examples
Sample Direct Measurement	Minimize sample preparation	In-situ analysis, non-destructive testing
Inherently Safer Chemistry	Hazard prevention	Non-toxic reagents, low-risk processes
Green Solvents and Reagents	Reduce toxicity	Water, CO₂, ionic liquids, bio-solvents
Non-Derivatization	Avoid chemical modification	Direct analysis, minimal processing
Integration of Processes	Streamline workflows	Online sample preparation and analysis
Fundamental Method Development	Design for sustainability	Optimized conditions for minimal resource use
Increased Safety for Operators	Protect personnel	Automation, closed systems, remote monitoring
Calibration with Minimal Standards	Reduce reference materials	Standard addition, internal standardization
Automation and Miniaturization	Reduce scale and manual steps	Lab-on-a-chip, microfluidic devices
New Technologies Implementation	Adopt innovations	Microwave-assisted, ultrasound-assisted methods
Carbon Neutral Footprint	Reduce energy impact	Energy-efficient instruments, ambient conditions
Elimination or Reduction of Waste	Prevent waste generation	Source reduction, recycling, proper treatment

The following diagram illustrates the interconnected relationships between these 12 principles and their collective contribution to sustainable analytical practices:

Greenness Assessment Metrics and the AGREE Framework

The evaluation and quantification of method greenness represents a critical component of Green Analytical Chemistry, enabling researchers to objectively compare the environmental performance of different analytical approaches. Numerous metrics have been developed to assess the greenness of analytical methods, each with distinct characteristics, advantages, and limitations [1]. Among these, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a particularly comprehensive and widely adopted tool that aligns with the principles of GAC.

AGREE offers a holistic assessment framework that considers multiple environmental parameters simultaneously, providing a balanced evaluation of analytical methods. Unlike earlier metrics that might focus on limited aspects of greenness, AGREE incorporates a broad range of factors including energy consumption, reagent toxicity, waste generation, and operator safety. This comprehensive approach makes it especially valuable for researchers seeking to optimize their methods for sustainability while maintaining analytical performance. The tool generates a visual output with a score between 0 and 1, allowing for intuitive comparison between different methods and identification of areas for improvement.

The following table compares AGREE with other prominent greenness assessment tools, highlighting their respective features and applications:

Table 2: Comparison of Green Analytical Chemistry Assessment Metrics

Metric	Key Features	Scoring System	Advantages	Limitations
AGREE (Analytical GREEnness)	Comprehensive multi-parameter assessment	0-1 scale with visual output	Holistic evaluation, user-friendly interface	Requires detailed method information
NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index)	Categorizes methods based on four criteria: PBT, hazardous, corrosive, waste	Pass/Fail for each category	Simple, quick assessment	Limited granularity, binary scoring
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty points assigned for non-green parameters	Higher score = greener method (ideal: 100)	Simple calculation, quantitative result	Does not weight parameters differently
GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index)	Pictorial representation with five pentagrams	Color-coded pentagrams	Visual summary, includes sample preparation	Qualitative rather than quantitative
ComplexGAPI	Extended version of GAPI with more parameters	Multi-sector pictogram	More detailed than GAPI, comprehensive	Complex interpretation, no single score
BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index)	Focuses on practicality and applicability	Score based on safety, cost, time	Emphasizes practical implementation	Limited environmental focus

The AGREE metric aligns particularly well with the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles, as it evaluates parameters that directly correspond to these foundational concepts. For instance, AGREE assesses solvent and reagent toxicity (aligning with Principle G - Green Solvents and Reagents), energy consumption (Principle C - Carbon Neutral Footprint), waste generation (Principle E - Elimination or Reduction of Waste), and operator safety (Principle I - Increased Safety for Operators). This alignment makes AGREE an ideal tool for researchers working within the GAC framework to validate and communicate the environmental benefits of their methods.

When implementing AGREE for method assessment, researchers should follow a systematic protocol that begins with compiling comprehensive data on all aspects of the analytical procedure. This includes quantifying the types and amounts of solvents and reagents, measuring energy consumption throughout the analytical workflow, documenting waste generation and treatment methods, and evaluating potential hazards to operators. The AGREE calculator then processes this information to generate both a numerical score and a visual representation of method greenness, enabling straightforward comparison between conventional and green alternatives.

For drug development professionals, the application of AGREE and similar metrics supports regulatory compliance and enhances sustainability reporting. As regulatory agencies increasingly emphasize environmental considerations in method validation, the ability to quantitatively demonstrate greenness becomes strategically valuable. Furthermore, the use of standardized metrics facilitates communication of environmental performance across organizations and throughout the pharmaceutical supply chain, promoting the adoption of best practices industry-wide.

Comparative Analysis: Traditional vs. Green Analytical Methods

A critical evaluation of traditional versus green analytical methods reveals significant differences in environmental impact, operational efficiency, and safety profiles. This comparison provides researchers with evidence-based justification for transitioning to sustainable practices and highlights the tangible benefits of GAC implementation across various analytical domains.

The fundamental distinctions between traditional and green analytical approaches manifest across multiple parameters, from sample size and solvent selection to energy consumption and waste generation. Traditional methods typically involve milliliter-scale sample volumes, hazardous solvents such as chloroform and benzene, high energy requirements for heating and cooling processes, and substantial generation of hazardous waste [2]. In contrast, green methods emphasize miniaturization (reducing samples to microliters or nanoliters), employ non-toxic alternatives like water or ethanol, minimize energy consumption through ambient temperature processes, and drastically reduce waste generation, often producing non-hazardous byproducts.

The following experimental data illustrates these distinctions across common analytical techniques:

Table 3: Quantitative Comparison of Traditional vs. Green Analytical Methods

Analytical Parameter	Traditional Method	Green Alternative	Experimental Data Supporting Green Alternative
Sample Size	Milliliters or more	Microliters to nanoliters	Microfluidic devices reduce sample volume by 99% while maintaining detection limits [2]
Solvent Consumption	50-500 mL per extraction	1-10 mL or solventless	Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) eliminates solvent use in sample preparation [2]
Energy Consumption	High (e.g., heating, vacuum pumps)	Low (e.g., room temperature methods)	Ultrasound-assisted extraction reduces energy consumption by 70% compared to Soxhlet extraction [3]
Waste Generation	High volume of hazardous waste	Minimal waste, often non-hazardous	Supercritical fluid chromatography reduces hazardous waste by 90% versus traditional HPLC [3]
Analysis Time	Hours to days	Minutes to hours	On-site analysis eliminates transport time, providing immediate results [2]
Operator Safety	High-risk due to toxic chemicals	Low-risk, improved lab safety	Replacement of benzene with ethanol reduces exposure to carcinogens [2]

Experimental Protocols for Green Analytical Methods

The transition to green analytical chemistry requires validated experimental protocols that deliver comparable analytical performance while reducing environmental impact. The following section details specific methodologies that exemplify the application of GAC principles in practice:

Protocol 1: Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) for Sample Preparation

SPME represents a solventless extraction technique that aligns with multiple GAC principles, including waste elimination (Principle E) and operator safety (Principle I). The protocol involves exposing a coated fiber to the sample matrix, allowing target analytes to adsorb onto the coating, followed by thermal desorption directly into the analytical instrument. Experimental validation demonstrates that SPME achieves comparable extraction efficiency to traditional liquid-liquid extraction while eliminating organic solvent consumption entirely. For example, in the analysis of volatile organic compounds in water samples, SPME provided detection limits of 0.1-5 μg/L without generating hazardous waste, whereas traditional methods required 50-100 mL of dichloromethane per sample [2].

Protocol 2: Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC) for Separation

SFC utilizes supercritical carbon dioxide as the primary mobile phase, significantly reducing or eliminating the need for organic solvents (Principle G - Green Solvents). The standard protocol employs CO₂ modified with small percentages of ethanol or methanol, typically achieving 70-90% reduction in solvent consumption compared to conventional high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Method validation studies confirm that SFC maintains resolution, efficiency, and sensitivity comparable to HPLC while dramatically reducing environmental impact. For pharmaceutical impurity profiling, SFC methods have demonstrated equivalent separation efficiency to HPLC while reducing organic solvent waste from 500 mL to less than 50 mL per analysis [3].

Protocol 3: Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE) for Sample Preparation

MAE utilizes microwave energy to accelerate extraction processes, aligning with GAC principles of energy efficiency (Principle C) and reduced processing time. The standard protocol involves placing samples in closed vessels with minimal solvent, applying controlled microwave irradiation for 5-20 minutes, then filtering or centrifuging the extract. Validation data indicates that MAE achieves equivalent or superior extraction yields to traditional Soxhlet extraction while reducing extraction time from 6-24 hours to 15-30 minutes and solvent consumption by 50-90%. For the extraction of natural products from plant materials, MAE protocols have demonstrated 95% recovery of target compounds using 30 mL of ethanol compared to 200 mL of hexane in traditional methods, with simultaneous reduction of energy input by approximately 80% [3].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the implementation of these green methods within an integrated analytical framework:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Solutions

Implementing Green Analytical Chemistry requires specific reagents, materials, and technologies designed to reduce environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance. This toolkit provides researchers with practical resources for transitioning from conventional to sustainable analytical methods.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Solution	Function	Traditional Alternative	Environmental Advantage
Supercritical CO₂	Extraction and chromatography mobile phase	Organic solvents (hexane, dichloromethane)	Non-toxic, non-flammable, recyclable
Ionic Liquids	Green solvents for extraction and separation	Volatile organic compounds	Non-volatile, recyclable, tunable properties
Bio-Based Solvents	Replacement for petroleum-derived solvents	Hexane, toluene, chloroform	Renewable feedstocks, biodegradable
Water at Elevated Temperatures	Green solvent for extraction	Organic solvents	Non-toxic, non-flammable, readily available
Solid-Phase Microextraction Fibers	Solventless sample preparation	Liquid-liquid extraction	Eliminates solvent use, reduces waste
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers	Selective extraction materials	Conventional sorbents	Enhanced selectivity, reusability
Enzyme-Assisted Extraction Reagents	Bio-catalysts for sample preparation	Chemical hydrolysis	Mild conditions, specific reactions
Microfluidic Chips	Miniaturized analytical platforms	Conventional scale equipment	Dramatically reduced reagent consumption

The selection and implementation of these green reagents require careful consideration of their specific applications and compatibility with analytical instrumentation. For instance, supercritical CO₂ serves as an excellent replacement for organic solvents in extraction processes and chromatographic separations, offering tunable solvation power based on pressure and temperature adjustments. Its non-toxic, non-flammable nature significantly improves laboratory safety while reducing VOC emissions [3]. Similarly, ionic liquids provide unique opportunities for green analysis due to their negligible vapor pressure, thermal stability, and customizable physicochemical properties through appropriate cation-anion combinations.

The integration of these materials into analytical workflows often requires modified protocols and instrumentation adjustments. For example, employing supercritical fluid chromatography instead of traditional HPLC necessitates specialized equipment capable of maintaining pressure and temperature conditions that keep CO₂ in its supercritical state. However, the environmental benefits substantiate these initial investments, with demonstrated reductions in solvent consumption of 70-90% compared to conventional methods [3]. Furthermore, many green reagents offer operational advantages beyond environmental benefits, including enhanced selectivity, improved extraction efficiency, and reduced analysis time.

For drug development professionals, the adoption of these green reagent solutions supports regulatory compliance with increasingly stringent environmental standards in pharmaceutical manufacturing and quality control. Additionally, the implementation of green chemistry principles aligns with corporate social responsibility initiatives and can enhance brand reputation among environmentally conscious consumers. As the scientific community continues to develop and validate green analytical methods, this toolkit of sustainable reagents and materials will expand, offering ever-improving options for maintaining analytical excellence while minimizing environmental impact.

The implementation of Green Analytical Chemistry represents both an ethical imperative and a practical pathway toward more efficient, safe, and sustainable laboratory practices. The 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles provide a comprehensive framework for redesigning analytical methods to minimize environmental impact while maintaining, and in some cases enhancing, analytical performance. The development and validation of greenness assessment tools, particularly the AGREE metric, enable researchers to quantitatively evaluate and compare the environmental footprint of different methodologies, supporting evidence-based decisions in method selection and optimization.

The comparative data presented in this review demonstrates conclusively that green analytical methods can achieve performance metrics equivalent to traditional approaches while offering substantial advantages in reduced solvent consumption, minimized waste generation, lower energy requirements, and enhanced operator safety. Techniques such as solid-phase microextraction, supercritical fluid chromatography, and microwave-assisted extraction have been rigorously validated across diverse application domains, providing researchers with reliable alternatives to conventional, resource-intensive methods.

For the pharmaceutical industry and research community, the adoption of GAC principles supports broader corporate sustainability goals while potentially reducing operational costs through decreased reagent consumption and waste disposal expenses. Furthermore, as regulatory agencies increasingly emphasize environmental considerations, proficiency in green analytical methods becomes strategically valuable for maintaining compliance and promoting positive public perception. The continued development of green reagents, miniaturized technologies, and energy-efficient instruments will further enhance the capabilities and adoption of Green Analytical Chemistry, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable future for chemical analysis and its numerous applications in scientific research and industry.

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a fundamental discipline focused on minimizing the environmental impact of analytical procedures while maintaining high analytical standards. The field is guided by the 12 principles of GAC, which provide a conceptual framework for making analytical methods more sustainable [3]. However, without robust tools to measure and quantify adherence to these principles, their practical implementation remained challenging. Early assessment tools like the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) offered simple pictograms but provided only qualitative, binary information (green or non-green) without granular scoring [5] [6]. The analytical community recognized the need for a metric that could provide both comprehensive coverage of GAC principles and a quantitative, reproducible score to facilitate objective comparison between methods. This need led to the development of the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric, which represents a significant advancement in translating conceptual GAC principles into a practical, numerical assessment framework [7] [5].

The AGREE Framework: Architecture and Scoring System

Foundational Principles and Calculation Methodology

AGREE is built directly upon the 12 principles of GAC, incorporating each as a specific evaluation criterion [5]. The tool employs a sophisticated scoring algorithm that calculates performance across all principles, resulting in both a pictorial representation and a numerical score between 0 and 1, where 1 represents ideal greenness [6]. This comprehensive approach considers multiple aspects of the analytical process, including sample preparation, reagent toxicity, energy consumption, waste generation, and operator safety [8].

The calculation process involves assigning a score for each of the 12 principles based on how well the method adheres to GAC ideals. Each principle is weighted according to its relative importance, and the software then computes an overall score [7]. The result is visualized in a circular pictogram divided into 12 sections, with each section colored from red to green based on performance for that principle, and the overall score displayed in the center [5]. This visualization provides immediate intuitive understanding while the numerical score enables precise method comparison.

Software Implementation and Usability

A key innovation of AGREE is its implementation as user-friendly, open-source software, making sophisticated greenness assessment accessible to practicing analytical chemists [5]. The software guides users through the evaluation process, prompting for specific information about their analytical method. Based on the inputs, it automatically generates both the numerical score and the colored pictogram [6]. This automation enhances consistency and reproducibility across different users and laboratories, addressing concerns about subjectivity that plagued earlier assessment tools [7]. The software's design represents a significant practical advancement in greenness assessment, moving from complex, expert-dependent evaluations to standardized, accessible metrics.

Comparative Analysis: AGREE Versus Other GAC Metrics

Evolution of Greenness Assessment Tools

The development of greenness assessment metrics has progressed through several generations, with each new tool addressing limitations of its predecessors. The evolution began with simple tools like NEMI, which used a four-quadrant pictogram with binary coloring (green or blank) to indicate whether basic environmental criteria were met [6]. The Analytical Eco-Scale introduced a penalty point system, where methods start with 100 points and lose points for non-green attributes, resulting in a numerical score [5] [6]. GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index) advanced the field with a multi-level colored pictogram covering five stages of the analytical process, providing more detailed visual assessment but lacking an overall numerical score [5] [6].

Table 1: Comparison of Major Greenness Assessment Metrics

Metric	Assessment Approach	Output Type	Scope	Strengths	Limitations
NEMI	Binary criteria evaluation	Qualitative pictogram	General analytical methods	Simple, intuitive	Limited criteria, no quantitative score
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty points	Numerical score (0-100)	General analytical methods	Quantitative result	No visual component, subjective penalties
GAPI	Multi-criteria evaluation	Colored pictogram	Entire analytical process	Detailed process assessment	No overall score, somewhat subjective
AGREE	Weighted principles scoring	Numerical score (0-1) + pictogram	General analytical methods	Comprehensive, quantitative	Does not fully cover pre-analytical stages
AGREEprep	Weighted criteria scoring	Numerical score (0-1) + pictogram	Sample preparation only	Specialized for sample prep	Limited to one process stage
GEMAM	Weighted criteria scoring	Numerical score (0-10) + pictogram	General analytical methods	Flexible weights, comprehensive	Newer, less established

AGREE's Distinctive Advantages in Quantitative Assessment

AGREE stands out for its balanced approach to quantitative and visual assessment. Unlike earlier tools that offered either numerical scores or pictograms, AGREE provides both, enabling both quick visual assessment and precise comparison [5]. The tool's foundation in all 12 GAC principles ensures comprehensive coverage of sustainability aspects, while its weighted scoring system acknowledges that different principles have varying levels of importance [7]. The software implementation addresses reproducibility concerns that affected earlier tools like the Analytical Eco-Scale, where assigning penalty points involved significant subjectivity [5] [6].

Recent comparative studies have demonstrated AGREE's effectiveness in providing nuanced assessments that capture trade-offs between different greenness aspects. For example, a case study evaluating a sugaring-out liquid-liquid microextraction (SULLME) method revealed how AGREE could identify specific strengths (miniaturization, avoidance of derivatization) and weaknesses (moderately toxic solvents, waste generation), resulting in a balanced score of 56/100 [5]. This granularity represents a significant advancement over binary tools like NEMI, which would simply indicate pass/fail for broad criteria [6].

Complementary Metrics and the Expanding Ecosystem

Specialized Assessment Tools

The success of AGREE has inspired the development of specialized metrics for specific applications. AGREEprep extends the AGREE concept to focus specifically on sample preparation, which is often the most environmentally impactful stage of analytical methods [5]. This specialized tool evaluates 10 principles of green sample preparation (GSP), providing both a numerical score and pictogram tailored to sample preparation techniques [8] [5].

Simultaneously, the field has recognized that greenness is only one dimension of method evaluation. The White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) concept has emerged, advocating for balanced assessment across three dimensions: red (analytical performance), green (environmental impact), and blue (practicality/economic factors) [9] [10]. This framework has led to the development of complementary metrics including the Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) for analytical performance and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) for practical considerations [10]. These tools use similar approaches to AGREE—software-based assessment generating pictorial and numerical outputs—creating a cohesive toolkit for comprehensive method evaluation [10].

Recent Advancements in Greenness Metrics

Recent years have witnessed rapid innovation in greenness assessment tools, with several new metrics offering different approaches and emphases. The Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) uses a star-shaped diagram to represent performance across multiple criteria, with the total area providing a visual indicator of overall greenness [9] [5]. GEMAM (Greenness Evaluation Metric for Analytical Methods) employs a hexagon-based pictogram and 0-10 scoring scale based on both the 12 GAC principles and 10 GSP factors [8]. The Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI) addresses growing climate concerns by focusing specifically on carbon emissions associated with analytical procedures [9] [5].

Table 2: Specialized and Emerging Greenness Assessment Tools

Tool Name	Primary Focus	Scoring Scale	Key Differentiators
AGREEprep	Sample preparation	0-1	Based on 10 GSP principles
CaFRI	Climate impact	Not specified	Focuses on carbon footprint
AGSA	Multiple criteria	Not specified	Star-area visualization
GEMAM	Comprehensive assessment	0-10	Combines GAC & GSP, adjustable weights
RAPI	Analytical performance	0-100	Red dimension of WAC
BAGI	Practicality	25-100	Blue dimension of WAC

Practical Application: Implementing AGREE in Analytical Development

Assessment Methodology and Workflow

Implementing AGREE in analytical method development follows a systematic process that begins with comprehensive data collection about all aspects of the method. Researchers must gather detailed information about: sample collection and preparation (solvents, quantities, techniques), instrumental analysis (energy consumption, automation), reagent usage (toxicity, amounts), waste generation (quantities, treatment), and operator safety considerations [8] [5].

The AGREE software then guides the evaluation through an intuitive interface. Users input data corresponding to each of the 12 GAC principles, and the software automatically calculates scores and generates the assessment pictogram [5]. For reliable results, analysts should consult safety data sheets for hazard information, instrument specifications for energy consumption, and experimental records for accurate quantification of materials and waste [6]. The completed assessment provides both an overall greenness score and detailed feedback on which principles need improvement, guiding optimization efforts.

Case Study: AGREE in Pharmaceutical Analysis

A practical illustration of AGREE implementation comes from a case study comparing different analytical methods for pharmaceutical compounds [5]. When applied to a method for determining antiviral compounds using sugaring-out liquid-liquid microextraction (SULLME), AGREE provided a balanced evaluation that captured both strengths and limitations [5]. The method received credit for miniaturization (reduced solvent consumption), semiautomation, and avoidance of derivatization steps, but was penalized for using moderately toxic solvents and generating waste without treatment provisions [5].

The resulting score of 56 highlighted the method's intermediate greenness status and identified specific areas for potential improvement. Compared to assessments using other metrics (MoGAPI, AGSA, CaFRI), AGREE provided the most balanced perspective between different sustainability aspects [5]. This case demonstrates how AGREE enables objective comparison of methods and guides researchers toward genuinely greener analytical practices by pinpointing exactly which GAC principles need attention.

Limitations and Future Directions

Current Challenges and Constraints

Despite its significant advantages, AGREE has certain limitations that represent opportunities for future development. The tool does not fully account for pre-analytical processes such as the synthesis of reagents or preparation of specialized materials [5]. This limitation is particularly relevant for advanced methods employing custom-synthesized nanomaterials or modified electrodes, where the environmental impact of material production can be substantial [7] [5].

Additionally, while AGREE's weighting system acknowledges that different principles have varying importance, the assignment of specific weights involves some subjectivity [7] [5]. Different applications might legitimately require different weighting schemes—for example, methods for routine quality control versus research applications might prioritize different greenness aspects [7]. The current AGREE implementation uses a fixed weighting scheme, which may not optimally serve all applications.

Emerging Trends and Next-Generation Assessment

The field of greenness assessment continues to evolve beyond AGREE, with several promising directions emerging. There is growing recognition of the need for integrated assessment platforms that combine greenness with other evaluation dimensions [9]. Such platforms would simultaneously assess red (performance), green (environmental), and blue (practical) characteristics, possibly incorporating newer dimensions like innovation potential (assessed by tools like VIGI - Violet Innovation Grade Index) [9].

Future metrics will likely incorporate more lifecycle assessment (LCA) principles, considering environmental impacts across the entire lifespan of analytical methods, from reagent production to instrument disposal [3]. There is also active research toward reducing subjectivity through more standardized criteria assessment and potentially incorporating artificial intelligence for more consistent evaluation [7] [9]. As the field matures, we can anticipate development of universally accepted benchmark values for greenness scores specific to different analytical application areas, similar to established validation criteria for analytical performance [7].

AGREE represents a transformative advancement in greenness assessment by successfully translating the conceptual framework of GAC principles into a practical, quantitative scoring system. Its combination of comprehensive principle coverage, weighted scoring algorithm, and intuitive visual representation addresses critical limitations of earlier assessment tools while maintaining practical usability through dedicated software implementation. As part of an expanding ecosystem of assessment metrics that includes specialized tools like AGREEprep and complementary metrics like RAPI and BAGI, AGREE enables analytical chemists to make more informed decisions that balance environmental concerns with analytical performance and practical considerations. While further development is needed to address limitations and incorporate emerging priorities like carbon footprint and full lifecycle assessment, AGREE has established itself as a foundational tool in the ongoing effort to make analytical chemistry more sustainable.

AGREE Assessment Workflow: This diagram illustrates how AGREE transforms GAC principles and method parameters into quantitative greenness scores through its software implementation and scoring algorithm.

Within the framework of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), the objective evaluation of an analytical method's environmental impact is paramount [11]. Several metric tools have been developed to provide this assessment, moving the discussion from subjective claims to objective, evidence-based evaluation [12]. Among these, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric represents a recent and comprehensive approach [11]. This guide provides a detailed comparison of four established greenness assessment tools—NEMI, Eco-Scale, GAPI, and AGREE—focusing on their application, scope, and outputs within analytical method development, particularly for pharmaceutical analysis. The objective is to equip researchers with the knowledge to select and apply the most appropriate tool for validating the environmental sustainability of their methodologies.

The adoption of green metric tools enables a systematic approach to reducing the environmental footprint of analytical laboratories. These tools help identify areas for improvement, such as reducing hazardous solvent use, minimizing waste, and lowering energy consumption [13] [14]. The following table summarizes the core characteristics of the four metrics examined in this guide.

Table 1: Key Characteristics of Greenness Assessment Metrics

Metric Tool	Full Name	Year Introduced	Type of Assessment	Scope of Assessment	Output Format
NEMI	National Environmental Methods Index	2002 [14]	Qualitative	Primarily focuses on reagents and waste [14].	Pictogram with four quadrants (green/blank) [14].
Eco-Scale	Analytical Eco-Scale	2012 [14]	Semi-quantitative	Penalty points for hazardous chemicals, energy, and waste [14].	Numerical score (100 = ideal) [14].
GAPI	Green Analytical Procedure Index	Information missing	Semi-quantitative	Extends evaluation to the entire analytical process [13].	Pictogram with five pentagrams (color-coded) [13].
AGREE	Analytical GREEnness	2020 [11]	Quantitative	Holistic assessment of all 12 principles of GAC [11].	Pictogram with a circular scale (0-1) and color code [11].

The selection of a metric often depends on the desired depth of analysis. While NEMI offers a quick, pass/fail visual snapshot, the Analytical Eco-Scale provides a more nuanced numerical score, allowing for easier comparison between methods [14]. GAPI and AGREE offer more comprehensive evaluations, with AGREE being particularly distinguished for its holistic integration of all 12 GAC principles into a single, quantitative output [11] [12].

Detailed Examination of Individual Metrics

National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI)

NEMI is one of the earliest tools, providing a simple, qualitative assessment. Its pictogram is a circle divided into four quadrants, each representing a criterion:

• PBT: The method does not use persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances.
• Hazardous: The method does not use reagents listed as hazardous by the EPA.
• Corrosive: All reagents have a pH between 2 and 12.
• Waste: The total waste generated is less than 50 g per sample [14].

A quadrant is colored green only if its criterion is met. A major limitation is that it does not address energy consumption, operator safety, or the amount of solvent used, only its hazardous nature [14].

Analytical Eco-Scale (AES)

The Analytical Eco-Scale is a semi-quantitative tool that calculates a score based on penalty points. It starts from an ideal baseline of 100 points. Penalties are subtracted for each reagent, instrument, and procedural step that deviates from ideal green conditions [14] [15]. The penalty for a reagent depends on its concentration and hazard classification according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). Additional points are deducted for energy consumption above 0.1 kWh per sample and for generated waste that is not properly managed [14]. The final score is interpreted as:

• ≥ 75: Excellent green analysis.
• 50 - 74: Acceptable green analysis.
• < 50: Insufficient green analysis [14].

Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI)

GAPI was developed to address the limitations of NEMI by offering a more detailed evaluation of the entire analytical process, from sample collection to final determination [13]. It uses a pictogram of five pentagrams, each divided into several segments that are colored green, yellow, or red to represent low, medium, or high environmental impact. The areas assessed typically include aspects such as sample treatment, instrumentation, and reagent quantities [13]. This tool provides a more in-depth visual profile of the method's environmental performance across its entire lifecycle compared to NEMI.

Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) Metric

The AGREE metric is a modern, quantitative tool that evaluates an analytical method against all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [11]. It outputs a final score between 0 and 1, where 1 represents perfect adherence to GAC principles. The result is presented in an intuitive circular pictogram, with each of the 12 sections representing one principle. The tool assigns a specific weight to each principle, allowing users to prioritize certain aspects of greenness based on their specific context. A key advantage of AGREE is its comprehensive nature, providing a balanced and defensible assessment of a method's overall environmental impact [11] [12].

Experimental Protocols and Application Case Studies

Case Study 1: Greenness Assessment of HPTLC Methods for Ertugliflozin

A 2024 study directly compared the greenness of Normal-Phase (NP) and Reversed-Phase (RP) HPTLC methods for analyzing the antidiabetic drug Ertugliflozin using four assessment tools [15].

• Experimental Protocol: The NP-HPTLC method used silica gel plates with a chloroform/methanol (85:15 v/v) mobile phase. The RP-HPTLC method used RP-18 plates with an ethanol-water (80:20 v/v) mobile phase. Both methods were validated per ICH guidelines, confirming linearity, precision, accuracy, and robustness [15].
• Greenness Results: The RP-HPTLC method was consistently identified as greener. The Analytical Eco-Scale score for the RP method was 87.41, significantly higher than the NP method's score of 99.28, indicating superior eco-friendliness [15]. This was attributed to the replacement of the hazardous solvent chloroform with the greener alternative ethanol. AGREE and other tools confirmed this finding, demonstrating the advantage of using multiple metrics for a synergistic understanding [15].

Case Study 2: Comprehensive Profile of Spectrophotometric Methods for Asthma Drugs

A 2025 study developed six eco-friendly spectrophotometric methods for analyzing Indacaterol acetate and Mometasone furoate in a combination product and evaluated them using multiple greenness, whiteness, and blueness metrics [16].

• Experimental Protocol: The methods (Dual Wavelength, Ratio Subtraction, etc.) were developed using ethanol, a satisfactory green solvent, for analyzing the drug mixture. The procedures were optimized for sensitivity and low solvent consumption, and validated according to ICH specifications, demonstrating high recovery (98-102%) and precision (RSD < 2%) [16].
• Greenness Results: The methods achieved excellent scores across various metrics: an Analytical Eco-Scale score of 93 (excellent), an AGREE score of 0.76, and a high BAGI (blueness) score of 90 [16]. These scores confirm that the methods successfully balance analytical performance with a reduced environmental footprint, aligning with the principles of White Analytical Chemistry.

Visualizing the Greenness Assessment Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for selecting and applying these greenness assessment tools, helping researchers choose the appropriate metric based on their needs.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Solutions

The following table details key reagents, solvents, and materials commonly used in the development of green analytical methods, as featured in the cited experimental protocols.

Table 2: Essential Reagents and Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Item Name	Function / Application	Greenness Consideration
Ethanol	Green solvent used in mobile phases (HPLC/HPTLC) and for sample preparation [15] [16].	Preferred over hazardous solvents like chloroform or acetonitrile due to its lower toxicity and better environmental profile [15].
Water	Green solvent used in reversed-phase chromatographic mobile phases [15].	Non-toxic, readily available, and the most environmentally benign solvent [15].
Methanol	Common organic solvent for analytical methods [14].	Less hazardous than alternatives like chloroform, but its use and volume should be minimized where possible [14].
Silica Gel & RP-18 HPTLC Plates	Stationary phases for planar chromatography [15].	Enable miniaturization and lower solvent consumption compared to some column-based methods [15].
Chloroform	Hazardous solvent sometimes used in traditional normal-phase chromatography [15].	Identified as a key target for replacement by greener solvents (e.g., ethanol) in method optimization [15].
AGREE, AES, GAPI, NEMI Software/Calculator	Digital tools for calculating metric scores.	Essential for providing objective, quantitative evidence of a method's environmental impact [12].

The evaluation of analytical methods has expanded beyond traditional parameters like precision and accuracy to include environmental impact, driven by the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) [9]. Greenness assessment metrics provide a standardized approach to quantify and compare the environmental footprint of analytical procedures. Several metric systems have been developed, including the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), the Analytical Eco-Scale, and the Green Analytical Procedures Index, each with distinct approaches and limitations [17]. These tools help researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals make informed decisions that align with sustainability goals.

The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric represents a significant advancement in this field. It is a comprehensive, flexible, and straightforward assessment approach that provides an easily interpretable result [17]. Unlike earlier metrics, AGREE evaluates analytical procedures against all 12 principles of GAC, offering a more holistic assessment. The result is presented via an intuitive, clock-like pictogram that communicates both overall greenness and performance across individual criteria, making it an invaluable tool for modern analytical laboratories striving to balance analytical efficacy with environmental responsibility [17].

The AGREE Metric: Framework and Components

Fundamental Structure and Calculation

The AGREE metric is built upon a comprehensive framework that translates the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry into a quantifiable scoring system [17]. Each of the 12 principles is evaluated and transformed into a score on a unified scale from 0 to 1. The final AGREE score is calculated as the product of the assessment results for each principle, resulting in a comprehensive value between 0 and 1 [17]. This overall score is visually represented in the center of the pictogram, with values closer to 1 and darker green colors indicating a greener analytical procedure.

A key feature of the AGREE approach is its flexibility through weighting. Users can assign different weights to each of the 12 criteria based on their relative importance in a specific analytical scenario [17]. For instance, some applications might prioritize minimal reagent use, while others might focus on energy efficiency or operator safety. These assigned weights directly influence the final score and are visually reflected in the width of the corresponding segments in the output pictogram, providing immediate insight into the assessment priorities [17].

The 12 Assessment Criteria

The AGREE metric comprehensively evaluates analytical methods against the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of Green Analytical Chemistry. The criteria encompass the entire analytical procedure:

• Principle 1: Directness of Analysis - Assesses whether direct analytical techniques are applied to avoid sample treatment, with remote sensing without sample damage scoring highest (1.00) and external sample pre-treatment with numerous steps scoring lowest (0.00) [17].
• Principle 2: Minimal Sample Size - Evaluates the goal of minimal sample size and number of samples without jeopardizing representativeness [17].
• Additional Principles - The remaining principles cover aspects including reagent toxicity, waste generation, energy consumption, operator safety, and throughput efficiency, providing a complete environmental and safety profile of the method [17].

Deciphering the AGREE Pictogram

Visual Anatomy of the Clock-like Graph

The AGREE pictogram presents assessment results in an intuitive, radial visualization resembling a clock face or pie chart. This circular graph is divided into 12 distinct segments, each corresponding to one of the 12 GAC principles [17]. The segments are arranged circularly, typically numbered from 1 to 12, allowing quick identification of performance in specific criteria.

Three critical visual elements work together to communicate the comprehensive assessment:

• Segment Color: The color of each segment indicates performance for that specific criterion, using an intuitive red-yellow-green color scale [17]. Green signifies excellent performance, yellow moderate performance, and red indicates poor performance in that principle.
• Segment Width: The width of each segment varies to reflect the assigned weight for that criterion [17]. Wider segments indicate higher importance was placed on that principle during assessment, while narrower segments indicate lower weighting.
• Central Score and Color: The overall AGREE score (0-1) appears numerically in the center of the pictogram, with a background color that also reflects this score using the same green color intensity scale [17]. A dark green center with a value close to 1 represents an ideally green procedure.

Interpretation of the Color Scheme

The color scheme in the AGREE pictogram provides an immediate, intuitive understanding of the method's environmental performance. The red-yellow-green gradient functions similarly to a traffic light system, where green indicates areas of strong environmental performance, yellow suggests moderate performance that could be improved, and red flags aspects with significant environmental concerns [17].

The intensity of the central green color corresponds directly to the overall AGREE score, with darker, more saturated greens indicating superior overall greenness [17]. This dual use of color—both in the individual segments and the central area—enables rapid interpretation at both detailed and summary levels, making the tool valuable for both deep analysis and quick comparison between different analytical methods.

Comparative Analysis with Other Greenness Assessment Metrics

Quantitative Comparison of Metric Systems

The following table summarizes the key characteristics of AGREE alongside other established greenness assessment tools:

Table 1: Comparison of Major Greenness Assessment Metrics in Analytical Chemistry

Metric System	Number of Criteria	Scoring System	Output Visualization	Key Advantages	Main Limitations
AGREE [17]	12 principles	0-1 continuous scale	Clock-like graph with color segments	Comprehensive criteria coverage; Flexible weighting; Detailed performance insight	Requires more detailed input data
NEMI [17]	4 criteria	Binary (pass/fail)	Pictogram with quadrants	Extreme simplicity	Limited criteria; Binary assessment lacks nuance
Analytical Eco-Scale [17]	Multiple penalty aspects	Penalty points from base 100	Numerical score	Semi-quantitative assessment	Does not cover all GAC principles
GAPI [17]	More than NEMI	Three-grade scale	Pictogram with traffic light colors	More criteria than NEMI	Limited to three performance levels
RGB Model [9]	3 dimensions (Red, Green, Blue)	Variable by dimension	Combined color output	Incorporates analytical performance and practicality	Less comprehensive for greenness alone

AGREE in the Context of White Analytical Chemistry

The evaluation landscape has evolved with the concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which aims to reconcile the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry with methodological functionality [9]. The RGB model, which combines red (analytical performance), green (environmental impact), and blue (practicality), forms the foundation of WAC [9]. Within this framework, AGREE specifically addresses the green (environmental) dimension with unprecedented comprehensiveness.

AGREE complements other specialized metrics like the Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) for analytical performance and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) for practicality aspects [9]. Recent tools like the Violet Innovation Grade Index (VIGI) further expand evaluations to include innovation criteria [9]. When used together, these tools provide a holistic White Analytical Chemistry assessment, though challenges remain in integrating their outputs seamlessly.

Experimental Protocols for AGREE Assessment

Step-by-Step Assessment Methodology

Implementing the AGREE metric requires a systematic approach to data collection and evaluation. The following protocol ensures a comprehensive assessment:

• Compile Method Parameters: Gather complete details about the analytical procedure, including sample preparation steps, reagent types and quantities, energy consumption, waste generation, and operational safety requirements [17].
• Input Data into AGREE Software: Use the freely available AGREE software (accessible from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE) to enter the collected data [17]. The interface guides users through each of the 12 principles with appropriate units and measurements.
• Assign Weighting Factors: Determine and apply appropriate weights (0-1) to each criterion based on analytical priorities and context [17]. Higher weights should be assigned to principles most critical for the specific application.
• Generate and Interpret Pictogram: The software automatically calculates scores and generates the clock-like pictogram [17]. Analyze the visual output to identify environmental strengths (green segments) and weaknesses (red segments).
• Compare and Optimize: Use the assessment results to compare alternative methods and identify opportunities for improving environmental performance in specific areas.

Practical Application Example

For instance, when assessing a sample preparation method, Principle 1 (directness of analysis) would be scored based on the approach used. Remote sensing without sample damage receives a perfect score of 1.00, while external sample pre-treatment with multiple steps scores 0.00 [17]. Similarly, energy consumption (Principle 6) would be evaluated based on the actual energy requirements of the instrumentation used throughout the analytical process.

The AGREEprep variant, specifically designed for sample preparation steps, follows a similar 10-step assessment aligned with the principles of green sample preparation [18]. This specialized tool is particularly valuable for drug development professionals where sample preparation often represents the most environmentally impactful stage of analysis.

Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Key Materials and Their Functions

The following table outlines essential reagents and materials that support the implementation of greener analytical methods in pharmaceutical research and development:

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Material	Function in Green Analytical Chemistry	Environmental Benefit	Application Examples
Bio-based Solvents	Replace petroleum-derived organic solvents	Reduced toxicity and biodegradability	Extraction processes in natural product analysis
Solid-phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers	Solvent-free sample preparation and concentration	Eliminates solvent waste	Drug metabolite analysis from biological fluids
Ionic Liquids	Alternative solvents with tunable properties	Low volatility reduces atmospheric emissions	Separation science and chromatography
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs)	Selective extraction and pre-concentration	Reduces need for multiple purification steps	Selective analyte extraction from complex matrices
Miniaturized Sensor Arrays	Direct analysis with minimal sample preparation	Reduces reagent consumption and waste	Point-of-care diagnostic devices
Catalytic Reagents	Enable milder reaction conditions	Lower energy requirements	Derivatization for detection enhancement

Visualizing the AGREE Assessment Framework

The following diagram illustrates the logical relationship between the input data, assessment process, and visual output of the AGREE metric:

The AGREE pictogram represents a significant advancement in greenness assessment by providing a comprehensive, visually intuitive tool for evaluating analytical methods. Its clock-like graph with color-coded segments effectively communicates complex assessment results across all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry, while allowing flexibility through user-defined weighting. For researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, AGREE offers a more nuanced alternative to earlier metric systems, enabling informed decisions that align analytical methodology with sustainability objectives. As the field progresses toward unified assessment frameworks like White Analytical Chemistry, AGREE's comprehensive approach to environmental evaluation will remain essential for developing analytically sound and environmentally responsible methods.

The Role of AGREE in the Broader Context of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC)

The paradigm of analytical chemistry has progressively shifted towards sustainability, leading to the establishment of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC). GAC focuses on minimizing the environmental impact of analytical procedures by reducing hazardous reagent consumption, energy requirements, and waste generation [17] [6]. This foundational concept later evolved into the more holistic framework of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which integrates environmental impact with analytical quality and practical functionality [19] [5]. WAC employs a triadic color model to evaluate methods: green for environmental sustainability, red for analytical performance, and blue for practical and economic feasibility [19]. Within this framework, metrics are essential for the quantitative and qualitative assessment of a method's greenness. Among the various tools developed, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a comprehensive, user-friendly, and informative calculator that aligns closely with the core principles of GAC and WAC [17] [20].

This guide provides an objective comparison of the AGREE metric against other common greenness assessment tools. It details their applications, methodologies, and performance within the broader context of WAC, providing researchers and drug development professionals with the data needed to select appropriate sustainability metrics for their analytical methods.

The drive towards sustainable analytical practices has spurred the development of numerous assessment tools. Table 1 summarizes the key characteristics of prominent greenness metrics, highlighting their evolution from simple, binary indicators to complex, multi-criteria frameworks.

Table 1: Comparison of Key Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) Metrics

Metric Tool	Year Introduced	Scope of Assessment	Scoring System	Key Advantages	Main Limitations
NEMI [6]	2002	Whole method	Binary (Green/Uncolored) pictogram	Simple, immediate visual information	Qualitative only; limited to 4 criteria; provides general information
Analytical Eco-Scale [6]	2012	Whole method	Penalty points subtracted from 100; semi-quantitative	Allows direct numerical comparison between methods	Relies on expert judgment for penalties; lacks a visual component
GAPI [5]	2019	Whole method	Multi-level color-coded pictogram (5 sections)	Visualizes environmental impact at each stage of the analytical process	No overall single score; some subjectivity in color assignment
AGREE [17]	2020	Whole method	0-1 score & clock-like pictogram	Comprehensive; combines 12 GAC principles into an easily interpretable score	Does not fully account for pre-analytical processes; subjective weighting possible
AGREEprep [20]	2022	Sample preparation only	0-1 score & round pictogram	First dedicated tool for sample preparation; user-friendly	Must be used with a whole-method tool for a complete picture
RGB Model [19]	-	Whole method (WAC)	Three scores for Green, Red (Analytical), Blue (Practical)	Evaluates all three pillars of White Analytical Chemistry	Less focused on detailed environmental breakdown

The progression of these tools demonstrates a clear trend towards greater comprehensiveness, quantification, and user-friendliness. AGREE occupies a significant position in this landscape by successfully integrating the 12 principles of GAC, known by the mnemonic SIGNIFICANCE, into a flexible and easily interpretable output [17].

The AGREE Metric: A Detailed Examination

Principles and Methodology

The AGREE metric is distinguished by its foundation in the 12 principles of GAC. It transforms each principle into a score on a unified scale from 0 to 1 [17]. The user inputs data related to these criteria, such as the nature and volume of reagents, energy consumption, waste generation, number of procedural steps, miniaturization, and automation [17] [20]. A key feature of AGREE is its flexibility; it allows users to assign different weights to each of the 12 criteria based on their importance in a specific analytical scenario, making the tool adaptable to diverse applications [17].

The output is an intuitive, clock-like pictogram with 12 segments. Each segment corresponds to one GAC principle, and its color (from red to green) indicates the method's performance for that criterion. The width of each segment reflects the weight assigned by the user. The final overall score, displayed in the center, is a value between 0 and 1, with 1 representing ideal greenness [17]. The software for AGREE is open-source and freely available, making the assessment procedure straightforward [17] [20].

AGREE in Practice: Experimental Protocols and Applications

AGREE has been widely applied to assess analytical methods across various fields, from pharmaceutical analysis to environmental monitoring. A typical protocol for using AGREE involves the following steps:

• Method Characterization: The analyst comprehensively details every aspect of the analytical procedure, from sample collection and preparation to final detection and data analysis [17].
• Data Input: For each of the 12 GAC principles, quantitative or qualitative data is entered into the AGREE software. This includes, for example, sample size, solvent volumes and toxicity, energy consumption per sample, number of procedural steps, and throughput [17].
• Weight Assignment (Optional): The user defines the importance of each criterion. For instance, in a method developed for field analysis, portability and energy consumption might be assigned higher weights [17].
• Score Calculation and Interpretation: The software generates the final score and pictogram. The analyst uses this output to identify environmental hotspots and compare the greenness profile with other methods.

A study comparing 10 chromatographic methods for analyzing UV filters in cosmetics effectively utilized AGREE and AGREEprep. The results demonstrated that microextraction methods for sample preparation achieved higher greenness scores, helping scientists select an environmentally friendly procedure for routine analysis [20].

In another case, a sustainable voltammetric method for estimating difluprednate was evaluated. The method used a glassy carbon electrode and required a minimal sample volume, contributing to a strong greenness profile as measured by AGREE. This assessment was part of a broader WAC evaluation using the RGB 12 model, which also considered the method's analytical performance and practical utility [19].

Comparative Analysis: AGREE vs. Other GAC Metrics

Performance and Usability Comparison

Table 2 provides a structured, point-by-point comparison of AGREE with other major metrics, based on real-world application data and tool specifications.

Table 2: Detailed Feature and Performance Comparison of GAC Metrics

Comparison Aspect	NEMI	Analytical Eco-Scale	GAPI	AGREE	RGB 12 Model
Basis of Assessment	4 general criteria [6]	Penalty points for hazards, energy, waste [6]	5-stage analytical process [5]	12 principles of GAC [17]	12 principles of WAC (Green, Red, Blue) [19]
Output Type	Binary pictogram	Numerical score (0-100)	Qualitative, multi-color pictogram	Numerical score (0-1) & colored pictogram	Three scores & combined color [19]
Quantitative Capability	No (Qualitative)	Yes (Semi-quantitative)	No (Qualitative)	Yes (Fully Quantitative)	Yes (Semi-Quantitative)
Scope of Analysis	Whole method (Limited)	Whole method	Whole method (More detailed)	Whole method (Comprehensive)	Whole method (Holistic)
Handles User-Defined Priorities	No	No	No	Yes, via adjustable weights	Implicit in the three pillars
Identifies Weak Points	Limited	Yes	Yes	Yes, visually intuitive	Yes

Strengths and Limitations in the WAC Context

The comparative analysis reveals distinct advantages of AGREE:

• Comprehensiveness: By incorporating all 12 GAC principles, AGREE offers one of the most complete environmental assessments available [17] [5].
• Actionable Output: The clock-shaped pictogram not only provides an overall score but also pinpoints underperforming principles, guiding chemists toward specific improvements [17].
• Flexibility: The weighting function allows the metric to be tailored to different analytical scenarios, enhancing its relevance and accuracy [17].

However, AGREE is not without limitations, especially when viewed through the lens of White Analytical Chemistry:

• Solely Environmental Focus: As a GAC metric, AGREE assesses only the "green" component. A complete WAC assessment requires supplementary tools, like the RGB model, to evaluate the red (analytical quality) and blue (practicality) aspects [19].
• Subjectivity in Weighting: While flexible, the assignment of weights can introduce subjectivity, though this is mitigated by requiring users to justify their choices [20].
• Pre-Analytical Phase: Similar to other tools, AGREE does not fully account for the environmental impact of synthesizing reagents or producing equipment used in the analysis [5].

Successfully implementing and assessing green analytical methods relies on specific reagents, technologies, and software.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Tool / Reagent	Function in Green Method Development	Example Application
Green Solvents (e.g., Ethanol, Bio-based reagents)	Replace hazardous organic solvents to reduce toxicity and environmental impact [5].	Used in extraction and chromatography mobile phases.
Microextraction Techniques (e.g., DLLME, SULLME)	Miniaturize sample preparation, drastically reducing solvent consumption (often to <10 mL) and waste [20] [5].	Pre-concentration of analytes from cosmetic, environmental, or biological samples.
Glassy Carbon Electrode (GCE)	Enables direct analysis with minimal sample preparation and reagent use, supporting Principle 1 of GAC [19].	Voltammetric determination of pharmaceuticals like difluprednate [19].
Gold Nanoparticles (GNP)	Modify electrodes to enhance sensitivity and selectivity, allowing for analysis in greener, simpler matrices [19].	Electrochemical sensor development for various organic compounds.
AGREE & AGREEprep Software	Open-source, freely available calculators to quantitatively assess the greenness of entire methods or sample preparation steps [17] [20].	Standardized evaluation and comparison of analytical methodologies for sustainability.

The AGREE metric represents a significant advancement in the toolbox of Green Analytical Chemistry. Its comprehensive basis in the 12 GAC principles, combined with a flexible, quantitative, and visually intuitive output, makes it one of the most powerful tools available for dedicated environmental impact assessment. While it excels in evaluating the "green" component, a truly holistic method selection within the White Analytical Chemistry framework requires integrating AGREE with other tools that measure analytical performance ("red") and practical efficacy ("blue"). As the field continues to evolve, AGREE is poised to remain a critical instrument for researchers and drug development professionals committed to making analytical science more sustainable without compromising on quality or practicality.

A Step-by-Step Guide to Implementing AGREE in Analytical Method Development

Accessing and Using the AGREE Open-Source Software

In the field of analytical chemistry, the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) have become increasingly vital for developing sustainable and environmentally friendly methods. Greenness assessment metrics provide a systematic way to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical procedures. Among these tools, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric approach stands out as a comprehensive, flexible, and user-friendly method for quantifying the greenness of analytical methods. The AGREE calculator provides an easily interpretable and informative result, making it a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners committed to sustainability [21].

This guide details how to access and utilize the open-source AGREE software and objectively compares its performance with other contemporary greenness and functionality assessment tools. The context is framed within White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), a modern concept that advocates for a balanced assessment of analytical methods by considering three primary attributes: analytical performance (red), practicality/economy (blue), and environmental impact (green) [10]. This holistic approach ensures that methods are not only green but also functionally effective and practical for real-world application.

Concept and Capabilities

The AGREE metric is a significant advancement in green chemistry assessment. It translates the 12 Principles of GAC into a quantitative scoring system. The tool uses a circular pictogram divided into 12 sections, each corresponding to one of the 12 principles. The software calculates a score from 0 to 1 for each principle, and the collective result is visualized with a colored diagram where darker green shades indicate a greener method. A final composite score, presented in the center of the pictogram, provides an at-a-glance assessment of the method's overall greenness [21].

Accessing the Software

The AGREE calculator is an open-source software freely available to the scientific community. Researchers can typically access the tool through dedicated websites or repositories hosted by its developers or affiliated institutions. The software is designed to be straightforward, allowing users to input data related to their analytical method and quickly receive a visual and numerical greenness assessment [21].

Comparative Analysis of Assessment Metrics

While AGREE focuses on environmental criteria, a comprehensive method evaluation requires a broader perspective. The WAC concept uses the RGB (Red-Green-Blue) color model as an analogy for a balanced assessment [10]. The table below summarizes key metrics used for this holistic evaluation.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of Analytical Method Assessment Metrics

Metric Name	Focus (RGB Category)	Key Characteristics	Output Format
AGREE [21]	Greenness (Environmental Impact)	Assesses method against the 12 Principles of GAC.	Pictogram (12 segments) & overall score (0-1).
RAPI [10]	Redness (Analytical Performance)	Evaluates 10 key analytical validation parameters (e.g., repeatability, precision, sensitivity).	Star-like pictogram & overall score (0-100).
BAGI [10]	Blueness (Practicality & Economy)	Assesses 10 practical criteria (e.g., cost, time, operational simplicity).	Star-like pictogram & overall score (25-100).
NEMI, GAPI, Analytical Eco-Scale [10]	Greenness (Environmental Impact)	Earlier or alternative greenness assessment tools with varying criteria and complexity.	Pictograms or quantitative scores.

The relationship between these tools in a comprehensive assessment workflow can be visualized as follows:

Experimental Protocols for Metric Application and Comparison

To ensure consistent and objective comparisons between AGREE and other metrics, a standardized experimental protocol should be followed.

Protocol for AGREE Assessment

• Methodology Documentation: Compile a complete description of the analytical procedure, including sample preparation, reagents and solvents used (with amounts), instrumentation, energy consumption, and waste generation.
• Data Input: Enter the required data points into the AGREE open-source software interface. This typically involves specifying the type and volume of solvents, mass of samples and reagents, energy consumption of equipment, and the number of samples processed per hour.
• Score Calculation: The software automatically weights each of the 12 principles and calculates a score for each segment.
• Result Interpretation: Analyze the generated pictogram. A dark green pictogram with a high central score (close to 1) indicates a green method. Lighter segments and lower scores highlight areas with significant environmental impact.

Protocol for Comparative WAC Assessment

• Method Selection: Choose two or more analytical methods designed for the same analysis (e.g., determination of a pharmaceutical in sewage sludge [21]).
• Independent Greenness Assessment:
  • Evaluate each method using the AGREE software.
  • In parallel, evaluate the same methods using another greenness metric, such as GAPI or Analytical Eco-Scale, following their specific protocols [10].
• Functional Performance Assessment:
  • Evaluate the analytical performance of each method using the Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI). This involves scoring the method against 10 validation criteria such as repeatability, intermediate precision, sensitivity (LOD, LOQ), linearity, accuracy, and robustness [10].
• Practicality Assessment:
  • Evaluate the practical aspects of each method using the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI). This involves scoring criteria such as cost, time, operational simplicity, and required skill level [10].
• Data Integration and Comparison:
  • Synthesize the scores from AGREE, RAPI, and BAGI for each method.
  • The "whitest" method, representing the best balance between performance, greenness, and practicality, can be identified by comparing the combined results [10].

Table 2: Example Results from a Comparative Assessment of Two Hypothetical Analytical Methods

Assessment Metric	Method A (Traditional)	Method B (Green Alternative)
AGREE Overall Score	0.45	0.78
RAPI Overall Score	85/100	80/100
BAGI Overall Score	65/100	80/100
Key Strengths	High analytical performance	Superior greenness, excellent practicality
Key Weaknesses	High environmental impact, moderate practicality	Slightly lower (but still acceptable) analytical performance

Successfully implementing greenness and functionality assessments requires a set of key tools and resources. The following table details essential "research reagent solutions" and software for this field.

Table 3: Essential Tools for Greenness and Functionality Assessment

Tool Name	Type	Primary Function	Access Model
AGREE Calculator [21]	Software	Quantifies the greenness of an analytical method against the 12 GAC principles.	Open-Source
RAPI Software [10]	Software	Evaluates the analytical performance (red criteria) of a method based on 10 validation parameters.	Open-Source (MIT License)
BAGI Software [10]	Software	Assesses the practicality and economic aspects (blue criteria) of an analytical method.	Open-Source
GAPI [10]	Metric/Pictogram	An alternative greenness assessment tool using a hierarchical pentagram pictogram.	N/A
RGB Model Sheets [10]	Assessment Framework	Excel-based sheets for a combined assessment of Red, Green, and Blue criteria under the WAC concept.	Open-Source

The AGREE open-source software is a powerful and accessible tool for quantifying the environmental friendliness of analytical methods. Its strength lies in its comprehensive basis in the 12 GAC principles and its intuitive visual output. However, as the paradigm in analytical chemistry shifts towards White Analytical Chemistry, it is crucial to use AGREE as part of a broader toolkit. For a truly holistic evaluation, researchers should complement AGREE with functional assessment tools like RAPI for analytical performance and BAGI for practical and economic factors. This multi-faceted approach enables scientists and drug development professionals to select methods that are not only green but also robust, reliable, and feasible for their intended application, thereby driving meaningful progress in sustainable science.

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) represents a transformative approach aimed at minimizing the environmental impact of analytical procedures while maintaining high standards of accuracy and precision. The foundational framework for GAC is provided by its 12 principles, which establish criteria for reducing hazardous waste, conserving energy, and improving overall safety in analytical laboratories [3]. These principles provide a systematic approach for designing and evaluating sustainable analytical methods across diverse application domains, including pharmaceutical development and environmental monitoring. Within this framework, the AGREE metric (Analytical GREEnness metric) has emerged as a sophisticated assessment tool that algorithmically incorporates all 12 GAC principles into a holistic evaluation system [22] [23]. Unlike earlier greenness assessment tools that focused on limited environmental aspects, AGREE provides a comprehensive, quantitative scoring system supported by intuitive graphical output, enabling researchers to benchmark and optimize their analytical methods against standardized sustainability criteria [23].

The development of AGREE reflects a growing recognition within the scientific community that sustainability assessments must consider the entire analytical lifecycle, from sample preparation to final determination. This comprehensive approach aligns with the broader objectives of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which seeks to balance analytical performance (red), environmental impact (green), and practical applicability (blue) in method development and selection [10] [23]. The AGREE metric specifically addresses the green component of this triad, providing researchers with a standardized methodology for collecting and evaluating input parameters related to each of the 12 GAC principles. For drug development professionals and researchers, understanding these input parameters is essential for conducting valid greenness assessments and advancing the adoption of sustainable analytical practices within their organizations.

Comprehensive Table of Input Parameters for the 12 GAC Principles

The AGREE metric evaluates analytical methods against the 12 GAC principles through specific, measurable input parameters. The table below provides a detailed breakdown of these parameters, their data requirements, and quantification methods essential for researchers conducting greenness assessments.

Table 1: Input Parameters for the 12 GAC Principles in AGREE Assessment

GAC Principle	Data Input Requirements	Parameter Quantification Method	Score Allocation
1. Directness	Sample preparation steps; derivatization requirements	Number of sample preparation steps; need for chemical derivatization	Higher scores for direct analysis without sample preparation
2. Sample Size	Sample volume/mass required	Measured in mL or mg per analysis	Smaller quantities receive better scores
3. In-situ Measurement	Analysis location (on-site vs. laboratory)	Binary assessment: in-situ or ex-situ	Preference for in-situ analysis
4. Waste Generation	Total waste volume; hazardous waste percentage	Waste volume per analysis (mL); toxicity classification	Lower waste volumes and hazards score higher
5. Safer Solvents/Reagents	Solvent/reagent identity; safety data	GHS hazard classifications; environmental impact data	Preferring water, ethanol, supercritical CO₂ over acetonitrile, chloroform
6. Derivatization Avoidance	Use of derivatizing agents	Binary assessment: required or not required	Methods avoiding derivatization score higher
7. Energy Consumption	Instrument power requirements; analysis duration	kWh per analysis; PBT (persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity) profile	Energy-efficient techniques (e.g., UV-spectroscopy) favored
8. Miniaturization	Instrument footprint; reagent volumes	Scale of equipment (bench-top vs. microchip); volumes used	Miniaturized systems (e.g., micro-HPLC) preferred
9. Automation & Integration	Degree of automation; operator involvement	Manual steps count; automation level	Higher automation receives better scores
10. Multi-analyte Capacity	Number of analytes determined simultaneously	Analytes per run	Methods determining multiple analytes simultaneously favored
11. Real-time Analysis	Analysis time; data delivery	Turnaround time from sampling to results	Real-time monitoring capabilities score higher
12. Operator Safety	Exposure risks; protective equipment requirements	Hazardous material handling; safety protocols	Safer working conditions score higher

The input parameters outlined in Table 1 serve as the fundamental data requirements for calculating the AGREE score, which ranges from 0 (least green) to 1 (most green) [23]. For example, when evaluating solvent selection under Principle 5, researchers should consult Globally Harmonized System (GHS) classifications and environmental impact data to quantify solvent hazards [3] [23]. Similarly, energy consumption under Principle 7 requires documentation of instrument power ratings and analysis duration to compute total energy usage per sample [23]. The systematic collection of these parameters enables objective comparison between conventional and green analytical methods, facilitating evidence-based decisions in method selection and optimization.

Experimental Protocols for AGREE Parameter Assessment

Protocol for Waste Generation and Solvent Hazard Assessment

The quantification of waste generation and solvent hazards follows a standardized experimental protocol that enables consistent data collection for AGREE evaluation. For waste volume calculation, researchers should systematically collect and measure all waste streams generated during the analytical process, including extraction solvents, mobile phases, cleaning solutions, and sample residues [23]. The total waste volume per analysis is calculated using the formula: Total Waste (mL) = (Volume of all solvents and reagents used) - (Final extract volume). This measurement should be performed in triplicate to ensure statistical reliability, with results reported as mean ± standard deviation.

For solvent hazard assessment, researchers must consult Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for each chemical used in the analytical process, focusing specifically on GHS hazard classifications related to carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, reproductive toxicity, and environmental hazards [3]. The AGREE metric assigns penalty points based on the number and severity of hazard classifications, with solvents such as acetonitrile and chloroform receiving significant penalties compared to greener alternatives like ethanol or water [23]. In a recent pharmaceutical analysis study, this protocol revealed that replacing acetonitrile with ethanol in HPLC mobile phases reduced the overall hazard score by 40%, significantly improving the method's AGREE rating [23].

Protocol for Energy Consumption Profiling

Energy consumption profiling requires meticulous measurement of electricity usage throughout the analytical workflow. Researchers should utilize calibrated power meters to record energy consumption for each instrument used, including sample preparation devices, analytical instruments, and data processing systems [23]. Measurements should encompass both active analysis time and standby power consumption, with results normalized to kilowatt-hours per sample (kWh/sample). The protocol specifies a minimum of five replicate measurements for each analytical step to account for operational variability.

The energy profiling protocol was effectively implemented in a recent study comparing conventional HPLC with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) for drug compound analysis [23]. Results demonstrated that although UHPLC instruments consumed more power per unit time, their significantly shorter run times (3 minutes versus 15 minutes for conventional HPLC) resulted in a 35% reduction in total energy consumption per sample, thereby improving the AGREE score for Principle 7 [23]. This highlights the importance of normalizing energy measurements per sample rather than focusing solely on instrument power ratings.

Visualization of GAC Principle Relationships and Assessment Workflow

The interrelationships between the 12 GAC principles and their implementation in the AGREE assessment workflow can be visualized through the following diagram:

GAC Principles Assessment Workflow

This visualization illustrates how the 12 GAC principles are organized into four logical categories within the AGREE assessment framework: Sample Management (Principles 1-3), Material Management (Principles 4-6), Process Efficiency (Principles 7-9), and Methodology (Principles 10-12). Each principle contributes systematically to the final AGREE score, which is computed through a standardized algorithm that weights these inputs according to their environmental significance [23]. The color-coding corresponds to the Red-Green-Blue model of White Analytical Chemistry, with green elements representing environmental considerations, blue representing practical methodological aspects, and red representing energy-intensive processes [10].

Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

The implementation of GAC principles requires careful selection of reagents and materials that minimize environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance. The following table details essential research reagent solutions for developing green analytical methods in pharmaceutical and bioanalytical applications.

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent Category	Green Alternatives	Traditional Hazards	Application Examples
Extraction Solvents	Menthol (biosolvent), Ethanol, Water [24] [23]	Chloroform, Hexane, Dichloromethane	Liquid-phase microextraction of pharmaceuticals from biological samples [24]
Chromatographic Mobile Phases	Ethanol-water, Carbonated water, Methanol [23]	Acetonitrile, Tetrahydrofuran	HPLC-UV analysis of β-blockers in urine [24]
Sample Preparation Materials	Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers, Molecularly imprinted polymers [24]	Liquid-liquid extraction with large solvent volumes	Pre-concentration of analytes prior to chromatographic analysis [24]
Analytical Scale	Microfluidic chips, Capillary columns [23]	Conventional HPLC columns (150-250 mm)	Miniaturized HPLC systems reducing solvent consumption [23]
Energy Sources	Ultrasound-assisted extraction, Microwave-assisted extraction [3]	Soxhlet extraction (energy-intensive)	Extraction of bioactive compounds from natural products [3]

The reagent solutions highlighted in Table 2 demonstrate how strategic material selection can significantly reduce the environmental impact of analytical methods while maintaining or even improving performance characteristics. For instance, the substitution of conventional organic solvents with bio-based alternatives like menthol in liquid-phase microextraction not only reduces toxicity but also enhances selectivity for certain pharmaceutical compounds [24]. Similarly, the adoption of miniaturized analytical systems decreases reagent consumption by 50-90% compared to conventional scale methods, directly addressing Principles 2, 4, and 8 of GAC [23]. These reagent solutions provide practical pathways for researchers to implement GAC principles in their experimental workflows while generating the necessary input parameters for comprehensive AGREE assessments.

The systematic collection of input parameters for each of the 12 GAC principles provides the foundation for rigorous AGREE metric assessments, enabling objective evaluation and comparison of analytical method greenness. The structured approach to data collection outlined in this guide—encompassing sample and waste measurements, solvent hazard classifications, energy profiling, and methodological documentation—ensures consistent and reproducible sustainability assessments. For researchers and drug development professionals, this systematic parameter collection facilitates evidence-based method selection and optimization, supporting the pharmaceutical industry's transition toward more sustainable analytical practices. The integration of these GAC principle assessments with complementary evaluation tools such as BAGI for practicality and RAPI for analytical performance enables a comprehensive White Analytical Chemistry approach that balances environmental, functional, and practical considerations in analytical method development [10]. As green chemistry principles continue to gain prominence in regulatory frameworks and quality standards, the standardized collection of these input parameters will become increasingly essential for demonstrating environmental responsibility and advancing sustainable science.

The evaluation of analytical methods has evolved significantly, transitioning from a primary focus on performance characteristics like precision and accuracy to a more holistic approach that incorporates environmental impact and practicality. The emergence of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) introduced a necessary expansion in focus, incorporating sustainability, safety, and environmental consciousness into method evaluation [9]. This movement laid the groundwork for comprehensive frameworks like the RGB model, which combines red (analytical performance), green (environmental impact), and blue (practicality) at the heart of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) [9]. However, as analytical sciences continue to advance, intersecting with data science, miniaturization, and complex regulatory demands, the limitations of even these broader frameworks have become evident [9].

This evolving landscape has led to the development of numerous greenness assessment tools, each with distinct approaches and emphases. While the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric and its sister tool AGREEprep for sample preparation have gained prominence, newer metrics like GEMAM (Greenness Evaluation Metric for Analytical Methods) have emerged to address specific needs in method evaluation [25] [9] [26]. The proliferation of these tools reflects a growing recognition that different analytical contexts may require different evaluation priorities, necessitating flexible approaches that can be adapted to specific method requirements and constraints [9].

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Evaluation Metrics

The field of greenness assessment has seen remarkable growth over the past five years, with a boom in the development of metrics specifically aimed at evaluating the environmental sustainability of analytical methods [9]. This proliferation, while reflecting growing interest in sustainability, has also led to overlapping tools that can be confusing for researchers seeking the most appropriate assessment method for their specific application. The table below provides a structured comparison of key metrics currently available to analytical chemists.

Table 1: Comparison of Key Greenness Evaluation Metrics for Analytical Methods

Metric Name	Evaluation Basis	Output Format	Key Strengths	Reported Limitations
GEMAM	12 principles of GAC + 10 factors of sample preparation [25] [26]	Pictogram on 0-10 scale (color and number) [25]	Simple, flexible, comprehensive; provides qualitative and quantitative information [25]	Newer metric with potentially limited adoption data
AGREE	12 principles of GAC [9]	Visual pie chart [9]	Established tool; allows identification of specific environmental weaknesses [9]	Focuses primarily on green aspects without integration with other dimensions
AGREEprep	Sample preparation factors [9]	Visual pie chart [9]	Specialized focus on sample preparation stage [9]	Narrow scope limited to sample preparation only
RGB Model	Combined red (performance), green (environment), blue (practicality) [9]	Triadic evaluation system [9]	Holistic approach beyond just environmental aspects [9]	No widely accepted strategy for combining or weighting outputs [9]
VIGI	10 innovation criteria [9]	10-pointed star with varying violet intensities [9]	Emphasizes innovation aspect; complements existing metrics [9]	Narrow focus on innovation parameters only

Specialized and Emerging Assessment Tools

Beyond the established metrics, several specialized tools have emerged to address specific niches in greenness evaluation. The Green Wine Analytical Procedure Evaluation (GWAPE) focuses on applications in enology, while the Analytical Green Star Area (AGSA) offers an alternative visualization approach [9]. More recently, tools like the Click Analytical Chemistry Index (CACI), Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI), and Battery Efficiency and Performance Scoring Index (BEPSI) have further diversified the evaluation landscape, reflecting ongoing specialization within the field [9].

The Violet Innovation Grade Index (VIGI) introduces a novel perspective by emphasizing innovation through 10 distinct criteria: sample preparation and instrumentation, data processing and software, white analytical chemistry and its derivatives, regulatory compliance, materials and reagents, miniaturization, automation, interdisciplinarity, sensitivity, and approach [9]. Each parameter is evaluated on a three-tiered scale (low, medium, high), generating a pictogram shaped like a 10-pointed star with varying violet intensities. This visual score facilitates rapid interpretation and comparison between methods, particularly highlighting contributions from advanced materials, miniaturized devices, and automation [9].

GEMAM: A Case Study in Customizable Metric Design

Architectural Framework of GEMAM

The Greenness Evaluation Metric for Analytical Methods (GEMAM) represents a sophisticated approach to greenness assessment that incorporates multiple evaluation dimensions into a unified framework. GEMAM is based on both the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) and the 10 factors of sample preparation, creating a comprehensive foundation for method evaluation [25] [26]. This dual foundation allows GEMAM to address the complete analytical procedure rather than focusing exclusively on either the analytical core or sample preparation in isolation.

The GEMAM calculation process is designed to be easily performable while yielding results that are straightforward to interpret [25]. The metric output is presented on a 0-10 scale, providing a quantitative measure of method greenness [25]. Additionally, GEMAM generates a pictogram that conveys both qualitative and quantitative information through color and number, creating an immediately accessible visual representation of the assessment results [25]. This combination of numerical scoring and visual representation supports both rapid comparison and detailed analysis of analytical methods.

Experimental Protocol for GEMAM Implementation

Implementing GEMAM for analytical method evaluation involves a structured protocol that ensures consistent and reproducible assessments:

• Data Collection: Compile comprehensive information about the analytical method, including reagents used, sample collection procedures, sample processing techniques, instrumentation requirements, energy consumption, and quantities of hazardous materials and waste generated [25] [26].

• Principle Evaluation: Systematically assess the method against each of the 12 principles of GAC, assigning scores based on adherence to green chemistry principles [25].

• Factor Assessment: Evaluate the method against the 10 factors of sample preparation, considering aspects specific to this crucial stage of analysis [25].

• Score Calculation: Process the evaluation data through the GEMAM algorithm to generate the composite score on a 0-10 scale [25].

• Pictogram Generation: Create the visual output that represents the assessment results through color and numerical display [25].

• Interpretation and Reporting: Document the assessment process and results, highlighting strengths and weaknesses identified through the evaluation [25].

Table 2: Core Components of GEMAM Evaluation Framework

Evaluation Dimension	Number of Criteria	Key Focus Areas	Application Context
GAC Principles	12 principles [25]	Minimizing negative impacts on safety, health, environment; reagent reduction; waste minimization [25] [26]	Overall analytical procedure environmental impact assessment
Sample Preparation Factors	10 factors [25]	Sample collection, processing, reagent use, energy consumption in preparation stage [25]	Specific evaluation of sample preparation greenness
Composite Scoring	Integrated assessment	Combination of principle and factor evaluations into unified score [25]	Holistic method greenness profiling

Advanced Customization Approaches for Specific Method Priorities

Weighting Strategies for Application-Specific Assessment

The customization of greenness metrics requires sophisticated weighting strategies that align with specific analytical priorities and constraints. Different analytical contexts—such as high-throughput drug screening, environmental monitoring, or forensic analysis—may legitimately prioritize different aspects of greenness based on their operational requirements and constraints. Implementing customizable weighting involves:

• Priority Identification: Determine which aspects of greenness are most critical for the specific application context, considering factors like sample volume, regulatory requirements, and operational constraints.

• Stakeholder Engagement: Incorporate perspectives from multiple stakeholders, including researchers, regulatory specialists, and environmental health and safety professionals.

• Weight Assignment: Develop a transparent protocol for assigning weights to different evaluation criteria based on their relative importance for the specific application.

• Validation Testing: Verify that the customized weighting scheme produces meaningful differentiations between methods and aligns with professional judgment.

• Documentation: Thoroughly document the rationale for custom weights to ensure transparency and reproducibility of the assessment process.

Integration with Complementary Evaluation Tools

Customizing greenness assessment often involves integrating multiple specialized metrics to create a comprehensive evaluation framework. The Graphical Layout for Analytical Chemistry Evaluation (GLANCE) provides a template designed to promote clarity and coherence in communicating analytical methods by condensing complex method descriptions into 12 blocks: novelty, target analytes, sample preparation details, reagents used, instrumentation, validation parameters, real sample application, applications of metrics, main results, identified limitations, and any complementary information [9]. This tool encourages brevity and focus by replacing prose with keywords, enhancing both reproducibility and communication [9].

The emerging PRISM (practicality, reproducibility, inclusivity, sustainability, and manageability) approach offers a promising standardization framework for guiding tool development and ensuring cross-platform coherence [9]. This framework supports the integration of specialized metrics like VIGI for innovation assessment with broader greenness evaluation tools, creating multidimensional assessment systems that can be customized for specific methodological priorities while maintaining methodological rigor and comparability [9].

Diagram 1: Custom Weighting Framework for Analytical Metrics. This workflow illustrates how application-specific priorities drive customized weighting of greenness, performance, and practicality assessments.

Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

The implementation of green analytical methods requires careful selection of reagents and materials that minimize environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance. The following table details key research reagent solutions that support the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Green Analytical Methods

Reagent/Material	Function in Analytical Methods	Green Chemistry Advantage	Application Examples
Alternative Solvents	Extraction, separation, reaction media	Reduced toxicity, biodegradability, safer waste profile	Water, ethanol, ethyl acetate replacing acetonitrile, chlorinated solvents
Renewable Sorbents	Sample preparation, extraction, clean-up	Biodegradable materials, reduced environmental persistence	Biopolymers, cyclodextrins, agricultural waste-derived sorbents
Catalytic Reagents	Reaction facilitation, signal generation	Reduced quantities required, enhanced selectivity	Enzymes, nanocatalysts, biomimetic catalysts
Energy-Efficient Materials	Instrument components, sample handling	Reduced energy consumption during operation	Low-energy detectors, miniaturized system components
Benign Derivatization Agents	Analyte modification for detection	Reduced toxicity, safer handling and disposal	Water-compatible agents, less hazardous alternatives

Implementation Challenges and Future Directions

Current Limitations in Metric Customization

Despite advances in greenness assessment tools, several significant challenges remain in effectively customizing metrics for specific method priorities. The proliferation of overlapping tools—with AGREE, GEMAM, and AGSA all attempting to evaluate similar aspects—creates confusion and can overwhelm chemists trying to determine the most appropriate metric for their specific application [9]. Furthermore, many existing tools provide standalone assessments without compatibility or integration pathways, leading to fragmentation that creates inefficiencies in peer review, regulatory compliance, and method comparison [9].

The absence of a common or connected framework for different assessment tools hinders the ability to synthesize evaluation results and develop comprehensive method profiles [9]. This limitation is particularly problematic when attempting to customize assessments for specific methodological priorities, as there is no established protocol for weighting or integrating results from different metrics. Additionally, the specialized focus of many tools—with some addressing only environmental aspects, others focusing solely on innovation, and still others concentrating on practical considerations—creates barriers to developing unified customization approaches that span multiple evaluation dimensions [9].

Emerging Solutions and Standardization Initiatives

The analytical chemistry community is increasingly recognizing the need for more integrated and customizable assessment frameworks. Promising developments include moves toward establishing shared guidelines, data standards, and visualization formats that could support more consistent customization approaches [9]. The PRISM framework offers a potential starting point for such standardization efforts, emphasizing practicality, reproducibility, inclusivity, sustainability, and manageability as key considerations for metric development [9].

Looking forward, we anticipate the development of digital dashboards, interactive interfaces, and AI-supported scoring algorithms that could enable real-time evaluation and dynamic updating of method profiles [9]. The integration of these tools with open-access databases and collaborative platforms could further enhance customization capabilities by providing broader context about method performance across diverse applications [9]. Such platforms would ideally allow researchers to input details about their specific methodological priorities and receive tailored assessments that weight different greenness criteria according to their stated requirements, while maintaining transparency and methodological rigor in the evaluation process.

The growing emphasis on environmental sustainability has made Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) a pivotal consideration in modern laboratories. GAC principles aim to minimize the negative environmental impact of chemical measurements by reducing energy demand, toxic laboratory waste, and the use of hazardous solvents and reagents [20]. Within this framework, the Analytical GREEnness Metric (AGREE) has emerged as a comprehensive, user-friendly tool for evaluating the environmental footprint of analytical methodologies. AGREE provides a quantitative score based on the 12 fundamental principles of GAC, offering researchers a standardized approach to assess and improve their methods [20]. This case study explores the application of the AGREE metric to evaluate chromatographic methods used for the analysis of ultraviolet (UV) filters in cosmetic products, demonstrating how this tool can guide scientists toward more sustainable laboratory practices without compromising analytical quality.

UV filters are chemical compounds widely used in cosmetic formulations, particularly sunscreens, to protect the skin from harmful UV radiation. Regulatory bodies, such as the European Commission, strictly control their concentrations in products, necessitating reliable analytical methods for quality control [20]. Traditionally, these methods have employed chromatographic techniques, primarily gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC), often with substantial environmental footprints due to high solvent consumption and energy requirements. This case study compares ten different chromatographic methods for UV filter analysis using the AGREE metric, highlighting how greenness assessment can inform method selection and optimization in pharmaceutical and cosmetic development.

Understanding AGREE and AGREEprep Metrics

The AGREE Metric System

The AGREE metric tool, developed by Pena-Pereira et al. in 2020, evaluates analytical procedures against all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [20]. Each principle is scored between 0 and 1, with weighting factors reflected in the width of each segment in the final circular pictogram. The assessment produces an overall score between 0 and 1, displayed in the center of a clock-like graphic, with color ranging from red (poor performance) to green (excellent performance). This intuitive visualization allows researchers to quickly identify both the overall greenness of a method and its performance across specific GAC principles. The software is freely available, enhancing its accessibility to the scientific community [20].

The 12 GAC principles assessed by AGREE include familiar sustainability concerns such as reagent toxicity, waste generation, and energy consumption, but also incorporate practical analytical considerations like miniaturization, automation, and throughput. This holistic approach ensures that methods are evaluated not just on their immediate environmental impact, but also on their efficiency and potential for integration into sustainable laboratory workflows.

The AGREEprep Complement

Recognizing that sample preparation often represents the most environmentally impactful stage of analysis, Wojnowski et al. introduced AGREEprep in 2022 as a complementary metric specifically focused on sample preparation [20]. This tool evaluates methodologies against 10 criteria derived from the Green Sample Preparation (GSP) principles, with default weights for each criterion that can be adjusted based on specific research contexts. Like AGREE, it generates a pictogram with a final score between 0 and 1, where scores above 0.5 indicate an acceptably green method [20]. The combined application of both AGREE and AGREEprep provides researchers with a comprehensive sustainability assessment covering both the sample preparation and analytical phases.

Methodology for Greenness Assessment

Selection of Analytical Methods

This evaluation examined ten chromatographic methods for determining UV filters in cosmetic products, selected to represent a diverse range of technological approaches [20]. The methods included one European standard method (Method 1: EN 17156:2018) and nine research methods from scientific literature. These procedures encompassed various sample preparation techniques: simple dissolution in solvent (Methods 1 and 2), solvent extraction with derivatization (Method 3), solid-phase extraction (SPE, Method 4), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE, Method 5), and several microextraction approaches including microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS, Method 6), micro-scale matrix solid-phase dispersion (µ-MSPD, Method 7), dispersive solid-phase microextraction (DSPME, Method 8), ultrasound-assisted vortex-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (US-VA-DLLME, Method 9), and dynamic hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME, Method 10) [20].

The analytical techniques paired with these preparation methods included both gas chromatography (with MS and MS/MS detection) and liquid chromatography (with UV-Vis, DAD, and MS/MS detection). This diversity allowed for a comprehensive comparison of how different technical approaches impact methodological greenness while addressing the same analytical challenge.

Application of Assessment Metrics

The AGREE and AGREEprep assessments were conducted using the freely available software from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [20]. For each method, data on all relevant parameters were collected from the method descriptions, including: quantities and toxicity of solvents and reagents, energy consumption, waste generation, sample throughput, automation level, and miniaturization程度. These inputs were systematically evaluated against the 12 GAC principles in AGREE and the 10 GSP principles in AGREEprep. The resulting scores and pictograms provided standardized measures for cross-method comparison, highlighting both overall performance and specific areas for potential improvement in each methodology.

Results and Comparative Analysis

AGREE and AGREEprep Scores Across Methods

The assessment revealed significant variation in greenness performance across the ten methods, with microextraction techniques generally achieving higher scores than conventional approaches. The quantitative results from the AGREE and AGREEprep evaluations are summarized in Table 1, which provides a detailed comparison of all assessed methods.

Table 1: Greenness Assessment Results for Chromatographic Methods Analyzing UV Filters

Method Number	Sample Preparation Technique	Analytical Technique	AGREE Score	AGREEprep Score
1	Dissolution in solvent	HPLC	0.39	0.32
2	Dissolution in solvent	HPLC	0.41	0.35
3	Solvent extraction with derivatization	GC-MS/MS	0.32	0.28
4	Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE)	GC-MS	0.45	0.41
5	Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE)	LC-MS/MS	0.44	0.39
6	Microextraction by Packed Sorbent (MEPS)	LC-MS/MS	0.61	0.58
7	µ-MSPD	GC-MS	0.59	0.55
8	DSPME	HPLC-DAD	0.63	0.61
9	US-VA-DLLME	HPLC-UV	0.65	0.63
10	Dynamic HF-LPME	HPLC-UV	0.68	0.66

The data clearly demonstrates that microextraction methods (Methods 6-10) consistently outperformed conventional techniques across both assessment metrics. Method 10 (Dynamic HF-LPME) achieved the highest scores (AGREE: 0.68; AGREEprep: 0.66), representing the most environmentally sustainable approach among those evaluated. In contrast, the European standard method (Method 1) and other conventional methodologies scored notably lower, primarily due to higher solvent consumption, greater waste generation, and lack of miniaturization [20].

Visual Comparison of Method Greenness

The following diagram illustrates the relationship between different method categories and their typical greenness performance, highlighting why microextraction approaches generally achieve higher scores.

Detailed Methodologies of High-Performing Techniques

The microextraction methods that achieved the highest greenness scores share several common characteristics that align with GAC principles:

Method 9 (US-VA-DLLME): This technique combines ultrasound and vortex assistance with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. The procedure involves using microliter volumes of extraction solvent dispersed in the aqueous sample with ultrasound and vortex mixing, significantly enhancing extraction efficiency while minimizing solvent consumption [20]. The minimal organic solvent requirements and short extraction times contribute to its strong AGREE and AGREEprep performance.

Method 10 (Dynamic HF-LPME): This approach utilizes a hollow-fiber membrane for liquid-phase microextraction in a dynamic mode. The method provides excellent clean-up and preconcentration of analytes while consuming negligible amounts of organic solvents [20]. The closed-system design minimizes solvent evaporation and operator exposure, further enhancing its greenness credentials.

Method 8 (DSPME): Dispersive solid-phase microextraction employs minimal amounts of sorbent material directly dispersed in the sample solution. After extraction, the sorbent is separated by centrifugation or filtration, and the analytes are eluted with a small volume of solvent [20]. This technique eliminates the need for large SPE cartridges and substantial solvent volumes typically associated with conventional solid-phase extraction.

Experimental Protocols for High-Scoring Methods

Dynamic HF-LPME-HPLC-UV Protocol (Method 10)

Sample Preparation: Accurately weigh 50 mg of cosmetic sample into a 15 mL vial. Add 10 mL of artificial seawater and agitate for 1 minute. Condition the hollow-fiber membrane with the organic solvent for 10 seconds [20].

Extraction Procedure: Install the conditioned fiber in the dynamic extraction device. Pass the sample solution through the fiber at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min for 10 minutes. After extraction, retract the fiber and elute the analytes with 20 µL of methanol into the HPLC vial [20].

Chromatographic Analysis:

• Column: C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm)
• Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:water (82:18, v/v) in isocratic mode
• Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min
• Detection: UV at 308 nm and 354 nm
• Injection Volume: 10 µL
• Run Time: 8 minutes [20]

Method Validation: The method was validated according to ICH guidelines, demonstrating specificity, linearity (R² > 0.998), precision (RSD < 5%), and appropriate detection limits for all target UV filters [27].

US-VA-DLLME-HPLC-UV Protocol (Method 9)

Sample Preparation: Weigh 100 mg of sunscreen product into a 10 mL centrifuge tube. Add 5 mL of methanol and vortex for 30 seconds. Add 5 mL of ultrapure water and mix thoroughly [20].

Extraction Procedure: To the sample solution, rapidly inject a mixture of 1.5 mL of acetonitrile (disperser solvent) and 150 µL of chloroform (extraction solvent) using a syringe. Subject the mixture to ultrasound for 1 minute followed by vortexing for 30 seconds. Centrifuge at 4000 rpm for 5 minutes to separate the organic phase. Carefully collect the sedimented phase with a microsyringe and transfer to an HPLC vial for analysis [20].

Chromatographic Conditions:

• Column: C8 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm)
• Mobile Phase: Methanol:water (80:20, v/v) in isocratic mode
• Flow Rate: 1.2 mL/min
• Detection: UV at 300 nm
• Injection Volume: 20 µL
• Analysis Time: 10 minutes [20]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful implementation of green chromatographic methods for UV filter analysis requires specific materials and reagents. Table 2 details essential components for these analyses, along with their functions in the analytical process.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for UV Filter Analysis

Item	Function/Application	Example Usage in UV Filter Analysis
HPLC-grade methanol and acetonitrile	Mobile phase components and extraction solvents	Used in mobile phase preparation and as disperser solvents in microextraction techniques [27]
C8 and C18 chromatographic columns	Stationary phases for reverse-phase separation	Essential for separating UV filters with different polarities; C18 columns provide longer retention for non-polar filters [27]
Phosphate buffer solutions	Mobile phase modifier for pH control	Maintaining acidic pH (2.0) to improve peak shape and separation efficiency for acidic UV filters like phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid [27]
Hollow-fiber membranes	Extraction interface in HF-LPME	Serving as a supported liquid membrane for selective extraction of UV filters from complex cosmetic matrices [20]
Microextraction sorbents	Extraction media in µ-MSPD and DSPME	Selective extraction of target UV filters with minimal solvent consumption [20]
Reference standards	Method calibration and quantification	Certified reference materials for accurate quantification of target UV filters in cosmetic products [27]

This case study demonstrates that the AGREE and AGREEprep metrics provide valuable, standardized tools for assessing the environmental sustainability of analytical methods. The application of these metrics to chromatographic methods for UV filter analysis reveals clear advantages for microextraction techniques over conventional approaches. Methods such as Dynamic HF-LPME and US-VA-DLLME achieved superior greenness scores while maintaining analytical performance comparable to established standard methods [20].

For researchers and drug development professionals, these findings highlight the importance of incorporating greenness assessment during method development and selection. By using tools like AGREE and AGREEprep early in the method development process, laboratories can significantly reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining analytical quality. The systematic approach outlined in this case study can be extended to other areas of analytical chemistry, supporting the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries in their transition toward more sustainable practices.

Future developments in green analytical chemistry will likely focus on further miniaturization, automation, and the development of even more environmentally benign solvents and materials. As these advancements emerge, the AGREE and AGREEprep metrics will continue to provide valuable guidance for researchers seeking to balance analytical excellence with environmental responsibility.

Greenness Assessment of a UPLC/MS/MS Method for Pharmaceuticals

The development of analytical methods in pharmaceutical chemistry has traditionally prioritized performance parameters such as sensitivity, accuracy, and precision. However, the environmental impact of these methods—including solvent consumption, waste generation, and energy usage—has become a critical consideration in an era of increased focus on sustainability [28]. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles provide a framework for evaluating and reducing this environmental impact [3]. Within this framework, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a comprehensive tool for assessing the environmental footprint of analytical methods [1].

This case study examines the application of AGREE and other greenness assessment tools to a UPLC/MS/MS method for quantifying pharmaceutical compounds and their impurities, positioning this advanced analytical technique within the broader context of sustainable method development. We compare the greenness profile of UPLC/MS/MS against conventional HPLC methods, providing quantitative data and methodological details to support objective comparison.

Experimental Protocol for UPLC/MS/MS Method Development and Greenness Assessment

Instrumentation and Chromatographic Conditions

The UPLC/MS/MS analysis was performed using an Acquity Waters system equipped with a binary solvent manager, auto-sampler, and tandem mass triple quadrupole detector [29]. The mass spectrometer was operated in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with electrospray ionization (ESI) interface in both positive and negative modes depending on the analyte [29].

Separation was achieved using an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm, 2.7 μm) maintained at room temperature [29]. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of methanol and 0.1% formic acid (90:10, v/v) eluted at a constant flow rate of 0.7 mL/min [29]. The total chromatographic run time was optimized to within 1 minute, significantly reducing solvent consumption compared to conventional methods [29].

Sample Preparation

The experimental protocol employed simple sample preparation involving dissolution in appropriate solvents, minimizing procedural steps and solvent consumption [29]. Protein precipitation using acetonitrile was applied for plasma samples, followed by dilution and injection [30]. This approach aligns with green sample preparation principles by reducing organic solvent usage and eliminating derivatization steps [28].

Greenness Assessment Methodology

The greenness profile was evaluated using five distinct metric tools: National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), modified NEMI, Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), Analytical Eco-Scale, and AGREE [29]. Each tool assesses different aspects of environmental impact:

• NEMI: A qualitative assessment using a pictogram with four criteria evaluating hazardous chemical usage, corrosivity, and waste generation [1]
• GAPI: A more comprehensive qualitative tool that covers the entire analytical process from sample collection to final determination [29]
• Analytical Eco-Scale: A semi-quantitative approach that penalizes methods for hazardous reagents, energy consumption, and waste [29]
• AGREE: A quantitative calculator that evaluates all 12 principles of GAC, providing a score between 0-1 [29] [1]

Results and Comparative Greenness Assessment

Analytical Performance of UPLC/MS/MS Method

The developed UPLC/MS/MS method demonstrated excellent analytical performance with linear ranges of 50.0-500.0 ng/mL for captopril, 20.0-500.0 ng/mL for hydrochlorothiazide, and respective ranges for their impurities [29]. The method was validated according to ICH guidelines and showed greater sensitivity and shorter analysis time compared to reported methods [29].

Table 1: Analytical Performance Parameters of UPLC/MS/MS Method

Analyte	Linear Range (ng/mL)	Retention Time (min)	Ionization Mode
Captopril (CPL)	50.0-500.0	<1.0	Positive
Hydrochlorothiazide (HCZ)	20.0-500.0	<1.0	Negative
Captopril Disulfide (CDS)	10.0-250.0	<1.0	Negative
Chlorothiazide (CTZ)	5.0-250.0	<1.0	Negative
Salamide (SMD)	20.0-400.0	<1.0	Negative

Comparative Greenness Assessment

The greenness assessment revealed that the UPLC/MS/MS method outperformed conventional HPLC methods across multiple metrics [29]. The AGREE metric demonstrated superior performance due to reduced solvent consumption, shorter analysis time, and minimized waste generation [29].

Table 2: Greenness Assessment Scores Comparison

Method	AGREE Score	Analytical Eco-Scale	NEMI Assessment	Primary Green Advantages
UPLC/MS/MS	0.82	>80 (Excellent)	Passed all criteria	Reduced solvent consumption (90% methanol), Short run time (1 min), Low flow rate (0.7 mL/min)
Reported HPLC	0.64	<75 (Acceptable)	Partial criteria	Higher solvent consumption, Longer run times (>5 min), Higher flow rates (>1 mL/min)

The AGREE assessment specifically highlighted advantages in several GAC principles: prevention of waste (Principle 1), reduction of sample size and derivatives (Principles 2 & 8), and integration of analytical processes (Principle 12) [29]. The miniaturization of the chromatographic system and reduction in analysis time contributed significantly to the improved greenness profile [28].

The AGREE Metric Framework in Pharmaceutical Analysis

Fundamentals of AGREE Assessment

The AGREE metric employs a quantitative approach to evaluate analytical methods against all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [1]. Each principle is scored based on specific criteria, with weights assigned according to environmental significance. The final score is presented on a 0-1 scale, where 1 represents ideal greenness [1].

The 12 principles assessed by AGREE include: prevention of waste, safe reagents, energy efficiency, use of renewable resources, waste toxicity reduction, real-time analysis, miniaturization, method simplification, integration of processes, analytical performance, operator safety, and cost-effectiveness [3]. This comprehensive coverage makes AGREE particularly valuable for comparing pharmaceutical analysis methods.

AGREE Implementation Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the systematic workflow for implementing AGREE assessment in pharmaceutical method development:

AGREE Assessment Implementation Workflow

This systematic approach enables researchers to quantitatively compare the environmental performance of different analytical methods and identify opportunities for improvement.

Advanced Green Assessment Frameworks

White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) - The RGB Model

Beyond traditional green assessment, White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) has emerged as a holistic framework that integrates three critical components: analytical performance (Red), environmental impact (Green), and practical/economic factors (Blue) [31]. This RGB model provides a more balanced evaluation of method sustainability.

In the WAC framework, the green component incorporates traditional GAC metrics like AGREE, while the red component adds analytical performance validation, and the blue component considers economic aspects including equipment costs, operational expenses, and method throughput [31]. This comprehensive approach addresses the limitation of focusing solely on environmental factors without considering method efficacy and practical implementation.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Analytical Chemistry

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) provides a "big-picture" perspective by evaluating environmental impacts across every stage of an analytical method's life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal of waste [3]. This approach helps identify hidden environmental costs, such as energy required for solvent production or emissions associated with instrument manufacturing [3].

When applied to UPLC/MS/MS methods, LCA typically reveals that the reduction in solvent consumption and waste generation during the operational phase significantly offsets the environmental impact associated with manufacturing more sophisticated instrumentation [3].

The Researcher's Toolkit for Green UPLC/MS/MS Analysis

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green UPLC/MS/MS

Reagent/ Material	Function in Analysis	Green Characteristics	Application Example
Methanol with 0.1% Formic Acid	Mobile Phase Component	Lower toxicity compared to acetonitrile, biodegradable	Drug and impurity separation [29]
Acetonitrile (HPLC Grade)	Protein Precipitation Solvent	Recyclable, enables minimal sample preparation	Plasma sample clean-up [30]
Water for Injection UPLC Grade	Mobile Phase Component	Non-toxic, renewable	Aqueous mobile phase component [29]
Acetic Acid (0.1-1%)	Mobile Phase Modifier	Biodegradable, enhances ionization	Ripretinib analysis in plasma [30]
Stable Isotope-Labeled Internal Standards	Quantitation Reference	Reduces method variability and reanalysis needs	Therapeutic drug monitoring [30]

The greenness assessment of UPLC/MS/MS methods for pharmaceutical analysis demonstrates clear environmental advantages over conventional HPLC approaches, particularly when evaluated using comprehensive metrics like AGREE. The significant reductions in solvent consumption, analysis time, and waste generation position UPLC/MS/MS as a more sustainable choice for modern pharmaceutical analysis.

The AGREE metric provides a valuable framework for quantifying these environmental benefits, while emerging approaches like White Analytical Chemistry offer more holistic assessment by integrating performance and practical considerations. As the field moves toward stronger sustainability models [28], the integration of greenness assessment into method development and validation will become increasingly important for aligning pharmaceutical analysis with global environmental goals.

Optimizing Analytical Methods and Overcoming Common AGREE Assessment Challenges

In modern analytical chemistry, particularly within pharmaceutical development, the environmental impact of methods is a critical concern. The principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) provide a framework for designing methods that minimize hazards, waste, and energy consumption [20]. The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric has emerged as a comprehensive, user-friendly tool that quantifies adherence to these principles, offering researchers a clear pathway to both evaluate and improve their analytical methods [9].

AGREE software generates a circular pictogram that scores a method against the 12 core principles of GAC. Each principle is individually assessed, resulting in an overall score between 0 and 1. This granular breakdown is instrumental for "Identifying Low-Scoring Principles," as it pinpoints specific areas where a method falls short of ideal greenness, allowing for targeted refinement [20].

The AGREE Tool: Structure and Significance of Principles

The AGREE metric evaluates an analytical method based on the 12 principles of GAC. The output is a clock-like pictogram where each of the 12 segments corresponds to one principle, with colors ranging from red (poor performance) to green (excellent performance). The final composite score in the center provides an at-a-glance assessment of the method's overall greenness [20].

The table below details what each principle encompasses and why it is significant for a sustainable analytical method.

Table 1: The 12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry as Assessed by the AGREE Metric

Principle Number	Description	Significance in Green Assessment
1	Direct analysis of samples without reagent consumption or waste generation.	Minimizes environmental footprint from the start of the process.
2	Minimization of sample size.	Reduces the quantity of materials and reagents needed downstream.
3	In-line measurements.	Can eliminate the need for separate sample preparation steps.
4	Integration of analytical operations and automation.	Improves efficiency and can reduce solvent use and waste.
5	Minimization of energy consumption.	Lowers the carbon footprint of the analysis.
6	Avoidance of toxic reagents and use of safer alternatives.	Reduces hazards to operator health and environmental impact.
7	Reduction of waste generation and proper waste management.	Directly addresses one of the most visible environmental impacts.
8	Multi-analyte determination to maximize output per analysis.	Improves resource efficiency.
9	Use of miniaturized systems and instrumentation.	Often leads to reduced consumption of samples and solvents.
10	Simplification of sample preparation and elimination of redundant steps.	Reduces time, energy, and material consumption.
11	Use of renewable and biodegradable materials.	Deploys sustainable resources.
12	Enhancement of operator safety.	Prioritizes the well-being of the analyst [20].

A Comparative Framework: AGREE and Other Greenness Metrics

While AGREE is a powerful tool, the landscape of green assessment is diverse. Other metrics provide different perspectives, and understanding their strengths and limitations is crucial for a holistic evaluation. A key development is the concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which advocates for a balanced approach by evaluating the red (analytical performance), green (environmental impact), and blue (practicality/viability) attributes of a method [9].

The following table compares AGREE with other established and emerging metric tools.

Table 2: Comparison of Greenness and Holistic Assessment Metrics for Analytical Methods

Metric Tool	Primary Focus	Key Features	Output	Key Advantages
AGREE	Comprehensive Greenness	Assesses all 12 GAC principles; allows user-defined weights.	Pictogram (0-1 score)	Intuitive visual output; detailed principle-level breakdown [20].
AGREEprep	Sample Preparation Greenness	Focuses on the sample prep stage based on 10 principles of Green Sample Preparation (GSP).	Pictogram (0-1 score)	Pinpoints environmental hotspots in the often most problematic stage [20].
NEMI	Environmental Impact	Uses four binary criteria (Persistent, Toxic, Corrosive, Waste).	Pictogram (filled/empty quadrants)	Simple and rapid initial assessment [15].
Analytic al Eco-Scale	Semi-Quantitative Greenness	Assigns penalty points for ungreen parameters.	Numerical Score (100 = ideal)	Provides a single numerical score for easy ranking [15].
GAPI	Comprehensive Greenness	Evaluates the entire procedure from sampling to determination.	Multi-colored pictogram	Covers a wide scope of the analytical process [20].
BAGI	Practicality & Viability	Assesses the blue dimension of WAC (e.g., cost, time, skills).	Numerical Score (100 = ideal)	Quantifies practical aspects often overlooked by green metrics [9].
VIGI	Innovation	Evaluates the innovative strength of a method across 10 criteria.	10-pointed star pictogram	Complements RGB model by measuring novelty [9].

Interpreting Low AGREE Scores: A Pathway to Improvement

A low score in any segment of the AGREE pictogram directly indicates a deviation from the ideal green practice for that specific principle. Systematic analysis of these low scores is the first step in method improvement. The strategies below are aligned with the principles from Table 1.

• Principle 1 (Direct Analysis): A low score suggests over-reliance on sample preparation. Strategy: Investigate direct analysis techniques where feasible, such as direct injection or spectroscopic methods, to eliminate derivatization or extensive extraction [20].
• Principles 2 & 9 (Miniaturization): Low scores indicate excessive sample/solvent consumption. Strategy: Transition to micro-extraction techniques (e.g., MEPS, DLLME) or scale down to micro-volume chromatography. Research shows microextraction methods consistently achieve higher AGREEprep scores [20].
• Principles 6 & 12 (Toxicity & Safety): Low scores flag the use of hazardous reagents (e.g., chlorinated solvents, strong acids). Strategy: Substitute with safer alternatives. A study comparing HPTLC methods replaced chloroform with ethanol, significantly improving the greenness profile according to multiple metrics, including AGREE [15].
• Principles 5 & 7 (Energy & Waste): Low scores point to high energy use or waste volume. Strategy: Optimize instrument methods for shorter run times, use room-temperature protocols, and employ solvent recycling. Newer metric tools are beginning to incorporate direct measurements like carbon footprint and total water consumption [7].
• Principles 4 & 10 (Integration & Simplicity): Low scores reveal a cumbersome, multi-step process. Strategy: Automate where possible and streamline the workflow by combining or eliminating steps. The GLANCE tool can help visualize and simplify method descriptions to identify redundancies [9].

The following diagram illustrates the decision-making workflow for diagnosing and improving a method based on a low overall AGREE score.

Diagram: Diagnostic and Improvement Workflow for Methods with Low AGREE Scores

Case Study: Greenness Assessment of UV Filter Analysis in Cosmetics

A 2023 study provides a clear, practical example of how AGREE and AGREEprep can identify superior methods based on their greenness scores. The research compared ten different chromatographic methods for determining UV filters in cosmetic samples, including a European standard method (based on liquid chromatography with simple dissolution) and several microextraction techniques [20].

The study found that methods employing microextraction techniques for sample preparation, such as Microextraction by Packed Sorbent (MEPS) and μ-MSPD, achieved significantly higher scores in the AGREEprep assessment. This directly illustrates the improvement strategy for Principles 2 and 9 (miniaturization), as these methods inherently use smaller sample and solvent volumes, generate less waste, and are often more amenable to automation [20].

In contrast, the European standard method and other conventional approaches, which typically involved larger volumes of solvents and multiple preparation steps, received lower greenness scores. This case demonstrates that even standard, accepted methods can have a considerable environmental footprint, and that alternative, greener methods are not only available but can be objectively identified using metric tools [20].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials for Green Method Development

Transitioning to greener analytical methods often requires a shift in the chemicals and materials used in the laboratory. The following table lists key reagents and solutions that facilitate the development of methods with higher AGREE scores.

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Greener Analytical Methods

Reagent/Material	Function in Analytical Chemistry	Role in Greenness Improvement
Bio-based Solvents(e.g., Ethanol, Ethyl Lactate)	Solvent for extraction, dissolution, and chromatography.	Replaces more toxic and petrochemical-derived solvents (e.g., chloroform, acetonitrile), directly improving scores for Principles 6 and 12 [15].
Water (as a Solvent)	Solvent for extraction and mobile phase in reversed-phase chromatography.	A non-toxic, non-flammable, and readily available solvent that is the ultimate green choice for Principles 6 and 7 [15].
Ionic Liquids	Specialty solvents for extraction and separation.	Can offer low volatility (reducing air pollution) and high efficiency, aiding in miniaturization (Principle 9) and waste reduction (Principle 7).
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs)	Selective sorbents for sample preparation (e.g., Solid-Phase Extraction).	Provide high selectivity, which can simplify sample cleanup (Principle 10) and reduce solvent consumption (Principle 7). Their synthesis can also be assessed with green metrics [7].
Microextraction Apparatus(e.g., for SPME, MEPS)	Device for miniaturized sample preparation.	Enables the implementation of microextraction techniques, directly addressing Principles 2 and 9 by drastically reducing solvent and sample volume [20].

The AGREE metric transforms the abstract goal of green chemistry into a concrete, actionable plan for method improvement. By systematically "Identifying Low-Scoring Principles," researchers and drug development professionals can move beyond a simple pass/fail assessment. This diagnostic approach enables targeted, effective strategies—such as solvent substitution, miniaturization, and workflow simplification—to incrementally enhance method sustainability. As the field advances towards unified frameworks like White Analytical Chemistry, the role of AGREE and similar tools will become increasingly central to developing analytical methods that are not only precise and accurate but also responsible and sustainable.

The adoption of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles has catalyzed the development of various metric tools to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods. However, this proliferation of assessment frameworks has introduced a critical challenge: subjectivity and inconsistency in greenness evaluations. Different tools, each with distinct algorithms and weighting priorities, can yield conflicting assessments of the same method, undermining the objective of reproducible and comparable sustainability metrics [9] [32]. This guide objectively compares the performance of leading greenness assessment tools, providing experimental data and protocols to help researchers navigate this complex landscape. The focus is placed on the AGREE metric (Analytical GREEnness) and its position within the broader ecosystem of evaluation tools, a context vital for advancing reliable greenness assessment methodologies [20].

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Assessment Tools

Multiple tools have been developed to quantify the environmental friendliness of analytical procedures. The table below summarizes the key characteristics of several prominent metrics.

Table 1: Key Greenness, Blueness, and Whiteness Assessment Tools

Tool Name	Acronym	Assessment Focus	Output Type	Scale/Rating
Analytical GREEnness [20] [29]	AGREE	Comprehensive method greenness	Pictogram (clock-face)	0-1 (1=greenest)
Analytical GREEnness for Sample Preparation [20]	AGREEprep	Sample preparation greenness	Pictogram	0-1 (1=greenest)
Analytical Eco-Scale [33] [32]	AES	Overall environmental impact	Numerical score	100=perfect, >75=green
Green Analytical Procedure Index [32] [29]	GAPI	Comprehensive method greenness	Pictogram (pentagrams)	Green/Yellow/Red
National Environmental Method Index [15] [32]	NEMI	Basic environmental impact	Pictogram (quadrants)	Pass/Fail (Green/Blank)
Blue Applicability Grade Index [34] [33]	BAGI	Method practicality & cost	Numerical score	Higher score=more practical

Performance Comparison and Subjectivity Challenges

Direct comparison of tools applied to the same methods reveals significant subjectivity in greenness scoring, arising from differing evaluation criteria and weighting.

Table 2: Comparative Greenness Scores for Reported Chromatographic Methods

Analytical Method Context	NEMI Profile	AES Score	GAPI Profile	AGREE Score	Key Subjectivity Findings
26 Empagliflozin Chromatographic Methods [32]	Varied; less informative	Numerical values out of 100	Fully descriptive, three-colored	Not Applied	NEMI was misleading; GAPI provided more precise & descriptive assessment.
RP-HPTLC vs. NP-HPTLC for Ertugliflozin [15]	Used for evaluation	Used for evaluation	Not Applied	Used for evaluation	RP-HPTLC was consistently scored as greener across 4 different tools.
UPLC/MS/MS for Antihypertensives [29]	Evaluated	Evaluated (Semi-quantitative)	Evaluated (Qualitative)	0.80 (Quantitative)	AGREE provided a quantitative score, facilitating easier comparison.
HPLC Methods for Melatonin [35]	All methods received similar, non-informative profiles	Scores provided a rank order	Pictograms showed detailed differences	Scores provided a quantitative rank order	NEMI lacked differentiation; AES and AGREE allowed for clearer ranking.

The data in Table 2 demonstrates that the choice of assessment tool directly influences the perceived greenness of an analytical method. A method deemed "green" by one metric might receive a mediocre score from another. This subjectivity stems from several core challenges within the assessment framework itself, as visualized below.

Experimental Protocols for Tool Application and Comparison

Protocol for Comparative Greenness Assessment

To ensure consistent and reproducible evaluations, follow this standardized protocol when assessing and comparing analytical methods.

Objective: To systematically evaluate and compare the greenness profile of an analytical method using multiple assessment tools. Materials: Description of the analytical method (reagents, instrumentation, sample preparation, waste generation, energy consumption). Software: AGREE calculator (available at: https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE) [20].

• Data Compilation: Gather all quantitative and qualitative data related to the analytical method's environmental impact. This includes:

  • Reagents: Type, quantity, and hazard classifications.
  • Energy: Instrument power requirements and analysis time.
  • Waste: Type and quantity generated per analysis.
  • Sample Preparation: Number of steps, automation, and miniaturization.

• Individual Tool Application:

  • AGREE Analysis: Input the compiled data into the 12 principle-based calculator. Record the final score (0-1) and the color of the generated pictogram [20] [29].
  • Analytical Eco-Scale Analysis: Start with a base score of 100. Assign penalty points for hazardous reagents, energy consumption, and waste. Classify the method based on the final score: >75 (excellent green), 50-75 (acceptable green), <50 (insufficient greenness) [33] [32].
  • GAPI Analysis: Qualitatively evaluate the method against GAPI's 15 criteria across five pentagrams. Assign green, yellow, or red to each criterion based on the method's environmental impact [32] [29].

• Comparative Data Synthesis: Create a comparison table (see Table 2). Place results from all applied tools side-by-side to identify consistencies and discrepancies in the assessment.

• Holistic Interpretation: Do not rely on a single tool. Use the combined output to form a balanced view of the method's greenness, noting both its strengths and weaknesses as highlighted by the different metrics.

Protocol for Evaluating a New Green Analytical Method

The following workflow outlines the key steps in developing a new analytical method with integrated greenness assessment, from initial design to final validation.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Solutions

The push for greener analytics has elevated the importance of specific solvents and reagents that reduce environmental impact without compromising analytical performance.

Table 3: Key Reagents and Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Item/Category	Function in Analytical Chemistry	Greenness Rationale & Example
Ethanol (EtOH)	Green alternative mobile phase component	Replaces more toxic solvents like acetonitrile or methanol. Used as EtOH-water mobile phase in HPLC [35] and RP-HPTLC [15].
Water	Solvent and mobile phase component	Non-toxic, safe, and readily available. Serves as a base solvent in reversed-phase chromatography [15] [35].
Deuterated Solvents (e.g., DMSO-d6)	Solvent for Quantitative NMR (qNMR)	Enables non-destructive analysis with minimal sample preparation and no derivatization, reducing waste [34].
Microextraction Techniques	Sample preparation and analyte pre-concentration	Minimize solvent consumption by orders of magnitude (e.g., MEPS, DLLME) compared to traditional liquid-liquid extraction [20].
Hydrophobic Derivatization Agents	Not applicable (Analyte Property)	The inherent property of an analyte like Melatonin allows for extraction and chromatography with greener solvents, avoiding toxic reagents [35].

The quest for consistent and reproducible greenness assessments requires acknowledging the inherent subjectivity of existing tools. Relying on a single metric is insufficient; a multi-tool strategy is essential for a balanced evaluation. The AGREE metric offers a valuable, quantitative, and comprehensive framework but should be used alongside other tools like GAPI, AES, and BAGI to provide a holistic view that encompasses greenness, practicality, and analytical performance [32] [20] [34]. The future of objective assessment lies in the development of integrated, standardized digital platforms that can harmonize these diverse metrics, ultimately providing a clearer and more reliable path toward sustainable analytical science [9].

Balancing Greenness with Analytical Performance and Practicality

The evaluation of analytical methods has undergone a significant transformation, moving from a singular focus on performance to a more balanced approach that incorporates environmental impact and practical feasibility. This evolution reflects the growing need for sustainable practices within laboratories, particularly in regulated industries like pharmaceutical development. The traditional model of method validation, which prioritized metrics such as precision, accuracy, and sensitivity, has expanded to include environmental consciousness and practical applicability [9]. This expanded focus is crucial for aligning scientific progress with the principles of green chemistry and sustainability.

The concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) embodies this comprehensive approach by integrating three critical dimensions: analytical performance (Red), environmental impact (Green), and practicality (Blue) [9]. This RGB model serves as the foundational framework for a balanced assessment, ensuring that methods are not only scientifically valid but also environmentally responsible and feasible for routine implementation. Within this model, the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric has emerged as a sophisticated tool specifically designed to evaluate the greenness of analytical methods, providing a calculated score based on the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [7] [9]. This guide provides a comparative analysis of AGREE and other key metric tools, offering researchers a structured approach for holistic method evaluation.

Comparative Analysis of Method Assessment Tools

A variety of metric tools have been developed to evaluate the different dimensions of analytical methods. The table below summarizes the primary function, key characteristics, and output format of several prominent tools.

Table 1: Comparison of Analytical Method Assessment Tools

Tool Name	Primary Focus & Dimension	Key Characteristics	Output Format
AGREE	Environmental Impact (Green)	Assesses 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry; allows adjustable weights [7] [9].	Pictogram with a 0-1 overall score [9].
AGREEprep	Environmental Impact (Green)	Specialized version of AGREE for the sample preparation stage [7] [9].	Pictogram with a 0-1 overall score [9].
RAPI	Analytical Performance (Red)	Systematically evaluates red attributes like selectivity, sensitivity, and precision [9].	Not Specified
BAGI	Practicality & Applicability (Blue)	Focuses on practical aspects, such as cost, time, and user-friendliness [9].	Not Specified
VIGI	Innovation (Violet)	A newer tool that complements RGB by assessing the innovative strength of a method across 10 criteria [7] [9].	10-pointed star pictogram with varying violet intensities [9].

The proliferation of these tools, while enriching, also presents a challenge due to potential overlaps and a lack of a unified integration framework [7] [9]. This can lead to inefficiencies in peer review and method comparison. To address this, experts recommend standardization frameworks like PRISM (Practicality, Reproducibility, Inclusivity, Sustainability, and Manageability) to guide tool development and ensure cross-platform coherence [9].

The AGREE Metric: A Detailed Protocol

The AGREE metric is a software-based tool that offers a nuanced evaluation of a method's environmental impact. The methodology for its application is outlined below.

Experimental Protocol for AGREE Assessment

The evaluation using AGREE is conducted through a structured data collection and input process.

• System Boundary Definition: Clearly define the analytical method to be assessed, including all stages from sample preparation to final determination and waste disposal [7].
• Data Collection: Gather empirical data for each of the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry. Relevant criteria include, but are not limited to [7]:
  • Energy Consumption: Amount of electricity (kWh) required per analysis.
  • Resource Use: Total volume of water and quantity of solvents/reagents consumed.
  • Waste Generation: Amount of waste produced per sample, categorized by hazard.
  • Hazardous Substance Use: Toxicity and quantity of reagents and solvents used.
  • Degree of Automation: The level of manual intervention required.
• Tool Input: Enter the collected data into the AGREE calculator software. The tool allows users to adjust the weight of each criterion to reflect its relative importance in the specific assessment context, though default weights are widely used [7].
• Score Interpretation: The software generates an output pictogram. The overall score, ranging from 0 (lowest greenness) to 1 (highest greenness), provides a quick reference, while the colored segments indicate performance on each individual principle [9].

AGREE Workflow Diagram

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for conducting a method assessment using the AGREE metric.

Beyond Greenness: Integrating Performance and Practicality

While AGREE excels at evaluating environmental impact, a truly balanced assessment requires the integration of performance and practicality metrics. The Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) are designed for this purpose, complementing AGREE to form a WAC-compliant evaluation [9].

A holistic comparison of analytical methods is best achieved by applying these tools in concert. The following table provides a hypothetical comparison of two analytical methods, showcasing how the RGB framework guides decision-making.

Table 2: Hypothetical Method Comparison Using RGB Framework

Assessment Aspect	Method A (Traditional)	Method B (Modern)
AGREE (Green) Score	0.3 (Poor)	0.8 (Excellent)
Key Green Findings	High solvent consumption, toxic reagents, large waste volume [7].	Miniaturized design, benign solvents, negligible waste [9].
RAPI (Red) Performance	Meets required precision and sensitivity [9].	Exceeds required precision and sensitivity [9].
BAGI (Blue) Practicality	High cost, requires specialized training, low throughput [9].	Moderate cost, user-friendly, high throughput and automation [9].
Overall Holistic Assessment	Technically valid but environmentally and practically poor.	Superior balance of performance, greenness, and practicality; recommended.

This integrated approach reveals that a method with marginally superior performance (Red) may be a poor overall choice if it performs badly on greenness and practicality, highlighting the critical importance of a multi-dimensional assessment.

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The implementation of greener analytical methods often relies on specific reagents and technologies that reduce environmental impact. The following table details key solutions relevant to sustainable analytical chemistry.

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Tools for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent / Tool	Function in Green Chemistry	Application Example
Bio-based Solvents (e.g., Cyrene)	Replace hazardous aprotic dipolar solvents (e.g., DMF, NMP); derived from renewable biomass [36].	Solvent for reaction chemistry and analytical sample preparation [36].
Sustainable Metal Catalysts (e.g., Nickel)	Replace scarce/precious metals (e.g., Palladium) in catalytic reactions, reducing environmental damage and cost [37].	Catalyzing key chemical reactions like borylation and Suzuki coupling in API synthesis [37].
Photocatalysis	Uses light energy to drive chemical reactions, often under milder conditions with fewer steps and less waste [37].	Enabling novel synthetic pathways for drug intermediates under low temperatures [37].
Electrocatalysis	Uses electricity to drive reactions, replacing hazardous chemical oxidants/reductants [37].	Sustainable route for diversifying candidate drug molecules [37].
Biocatalysts	Proteins that accelerate reactions; often achieve in one step what requires multiple steps with traditional chemistry [37].	Streamlined synthesis of complex drug molecules [37].
Process Mass Intensity (PMI) Calculator	Metric to sum the quantity of all input materials per kg of output; used to minimize waste [37].	Assessing and optimizing the efficiency of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) synthesis routes [37].

The journey toward truly sustainable laboratories requires moving beyond a performance-only mindset. The AGREE metric is a powerful, specialized tool for quantifying the environmental footprint of analytical methods. However, as this guide demonstrates, the most informed decisions arise from a holistic evaluation that equally weights the Red (performance), Green (environmental), and Blue (practical) dimensions, as advocated by the White Analytical Chemistry framework [9].

The future of method assessment points toward greater integration and digitalization. The development of tools like VIGI (Violet Innovation Grade Index) to measure innovation and GLANCE (Graphical Layout for Analytical Chemistry Evaluation) to simplify reporting are steps in this direction [9]. The ultimate goal is the creation of unified digital platforms or dashboards. Such platforms could leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to provide researchers with a comprehensive, real-time sustainability and performance profile of their methods, seamlessly integrating the outputs of AGREE, RAPI, BAGI, and other tools [7] [9]. By adopting these comprehensive evaluation strategies today, researchers and drug development professionals can significantly advance the principles of green chemistry and contribute to a more sustainable scientific future.

Leveraging Microextraction and Miniaturization for Higher Scores

The principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) have revolutionized how scientists evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods. With the advent of standardized assessment tools, researchers can now quantitatively measure and compare the ecological footprint of their workflows. The core focus of GAC is to minimize the negative impacts of analytical procedures on human safety, health, and the environment by considering factors such as reagent toxicity, energy consumption, sample processing, and waste generation [25] [5].

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as one of the most comprehensive tools for this assessment. Unlike earlier models that provided binary results, AGREE evaluates methods against all 12 principles of GAC, providing both a numerical score (0-1) and an intuitive circular pictogram that visually represents performance across multiple sustainability criteria [5]. This holistic approach has made AGREE particularly valuable for objectively comparing traditional methods with innovative approaches that incorporate microextraction and instrument miniaturization—two strategies that significantly enhance environmental sustainability while maintaining analytical excellence [38] [39].

This guide explores how integrating microextraction techniques and miniaturized technologies systematically improves AGREE scores, providing researchers with evidence-based protocols for developing more sustainable analytical methods without compromising data quality.

The AGREE Metric: A Benchmark for Environmental Sustainability

Fundamental Principles and Calculation Methodology

The AGREE metric represents a significant advancement in greenness assessment by incorporating all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry into a unified evaluation framework. Developed to address limitations of earlier tools, AGREE provides both quantitative and visual outputs that enable straightforward comparison between methods [5]. The calculation algorithm weights each principle according to its environmental impact, generating an overall score between 0 and 1, where higher values indicate superior greenness. The accompanying pictogram uses a color-gradient scale from red (poor performance) to green (excellent performance) across twelve segments, creating an immediate visual assessment of a method's environmental profile [5].

AGREE specifically evaluates factors including energy consumption, reagent toxicity, waste generation, operator safety, and analytical throughput [5]. This comprehensive coverage makes it particularly sensitive to improvements achieved through microextraction and miniaturization strategies, which directly address multiple GAC principles simultaneously. The metric has gained widespread adoption in pharmaceutical analysis, environmental monitoring, and food safety testing, where regulatory requirements and sustainability goals must be balanced [38] [10].

Complementary Assessment Tools

While AGREE provides comprehensive environmental assessment, the White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) concept emphasizes balancing ecological concerns with practical functionality. This framework introduces two complementary metrics: the Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) for evaluating analytical performance criteria, and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) for assessing practical and economic factors [10]. This triad approach ensures that methods are not only environmentally sound but also analytically robust and practically feasible:

• RAPI evaluates ten analytical performance parameters including precision, sensitivity, linearity, and robustness, presenting results in a star-shaped diagram [10]
• BAGI assesses practical considerations such as equipment cost, operational complexity, and throughput with similar visualization [10]
• Integrated RGB assessment combines environmental, performance, and practical metrics for holistic method evaluation [10]

This comprehensive evaluation framework demonstrates that microextraction and miniaturization strategies must maintain analytical performance while improving environmental metrics to be truly valuable to researchers.

Microextraction Techniques: Principles and Workflows

Fundamental Concepts and Green Advantages

Microextraction techniques represent a paradigm shift in sample preparation, dramatically reducing solvent consumption from tens or hundreds of milliliters to microliter volumes. This direct approach targets one of the most significant environmental impacts in analytical chemistry—hazardous solvent waste [40]. By definition, microextraction encompasses methods that use less than 100 μL of extraction solvent, achieving 50-100-fold reductions in organic solvent consumption compared to traditional liquid-liquid extraction [38] [40].

The green advantages of microextraction extend beyond solvent reduction. These techniques typically require smaller sample volumes, minimize energy consumption through simplified procedures, and reduce overall waste generation [38] [40]. When properly optimized, microextraction methods also provide excellent enrichment factors and improved selectivity through careful choice of extraction phases. The direct alignment of these benefits with multiple GAC principles explains why properly implemented microextraction methods consistently achieve AGREE scores 20-40% higher than traditional approaches [5] [40].

Vortex-Assisted Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Protocol

A recent study demonstrates the effective implementation of microextraction for determining hippuric acid in urine samples as a biomarker of toluene exposure [40]. The optimized protocol provides an exemplary case study of green method development with detailed experimental parameters:

• Sample Preparation: 15 mL of urine sample adjusted to pH 2.7 using hydrochloric acid
• Extraction Solvent: 152 μL of 1-octanol selected through systematic solvent screening
• Extraction Process: Vortex mixing for 253 seconds (4.2 minutes) to form a fine emulsion
• Phase Separation: Centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 5 minutes
• Analysis: HPLC-DAD analysis at 254 nm using a C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) with water/acetonitrile/acetic acid (84:15:1 v/v/v) mobile phase at 1.5 mL/min flow rate [40]

This optimized VADLLME protocol achieved an extraction efficiency of 91.7% for hippuric acid with excellent precision (%RSD 2.11-4.25), demonstrating that microextraction can deliver robust analytical performance while minimizing environmental impact [40]. The method showed linearity from 1 to 900 ng mL⁻¹ with a detection limit of 0.15 ng mL⁻¹, confirming sensitivity comparable to conventional techniques while using approximately 1% of the typical solvent volume [40].

Table 1: Research Reagent Solutions for VADLLME Protocol

Reagent/Material	Function in Protocol	Green Attributes
1-Octanol (152 µL)	Extraction solvent for hippuric acid	Low volatility, minimal volume, reduced toxicity
Urine Sample (15 mL)	Biological matrix containing analyte	Small sample volume requirement
Acetic Acid	Mobile phase component for HPLC	Biodegradable, low environmental persistence
C18 Chromatographic Column	Stationary phase for separation	Reusable, high efficiency

Method Optimization Using Multivariate Approaches

The VADLLME case study exemplifies how systematic optimization enhances both green and performance metrics. Researchers employed Box-Behnken Design (BBD) response surface methodology to simultaneously optimize four critical parameters: extractant volume (50-250 μL), salt concentration (0-20% w/v), vortex time (60-300 s), and pH (1-7) [40]. This multivariate approach minimized experimental runs while identifying optimal conditions that maximized extraction efficiency and minimized solvent consumption—key factors in AGREE assessment.

The optimization demonstrated that 152 μL of 1-octanol, 3.9% w/v salt, 253 s vortex time, and pH 2.7 provided the ideal balance, achieving a desirability function of 1.0 [40]. This systematic approach to method development directly supports green chemistry principles by avoiding trial-and-error optimization that typically consumes substantial reagents and generates unnecessary waste.

Miniaturization Technologies in Separation Science

Liquid Chromatography Miniaturization Strategies

Instrument miniaturization represents the second pillar of sustainable analytical method development, with particularly significant advances in liquid chromatography. Miniaturized LC systems achieve substantial environmental benefits through three primary approaches: reduced column internal dimensions, advanced stationary phases, and miniaturized instrumentation [41] [39].

Columns with narrower internal diameters (2.1 mm or 1.0 mm vs. conventional 4.6 mm) operated at proportionally lower flow rates can reduce mobile phase consumption by 70-90% while maintaining separation efficiency [39]. One documented method transition from a 4.6 mm ID column at 1.68 mL/min to a 2.1 mm ID column at 0.35 mL/min reduced mobile phase volume by 79.2% within the same timeframe [39]. This direct reduction in solvent use addresses multiple GAC principles simultaneously, particularly when combined with greener solvent choices.

The integration of superficially porous particles (SPPs) and monodisperse fully porous particles further enhances the sustainability profile of miniaturized separations. These advanced materials provide superior efficiency, allowing shorter columns and faster separations while maintaining resolution [42] [39]. One study documented a 50% reduction in both run time and solvent consumption when switching from fully porous to SPP columns of identical dimensions and chemistry [39].

Portable and Capillary Scale Systems

Recent innovations in compact, portable, and capillary-scale LC systems extend miniaturization benefits to field-based analysis, eliminating sample transport and associated environmental impacts. These systems incorporate microbore or capillary columns, miniaturized pumping systems, and compact detectors to create fully functional chromatographs with dramatically reduced resource requirements [43] [41].

Field applications demonstrate the practical benefits of these technologies. Portable ion chromatography systems have been deployed for environmental nutrient monitoring in remote Tasmanian locations, powered by batteries or portable generators [43]. These systems used dilute NaCl eluent instead of hazardous chemicals and operated in micro-bore format to minimize reagent requirements for extended deployment [43]. Similarly, "lab-in-a-van" mobile LC-MS platforms have enabled on-site PFAS screening, analyzing over 200 environmental samples during a 10-day roadshow while eliminating shipping and preservation requirements [43].

Capillary LC systems with back pressure thresholds approaching 5000 psi coupled with compact mass spectrometers have demonstrated rapid PFAS screening with 6.5-minute run times, quantifying 10 prevalent PFAS compounds in extracted environmental samples [43]. These systems consume nanoliter to microliter flow rates, reducing solvent consumption by up to 1000-fold compared to conventional LC systems [41].

Table 2: Quantitative Environmental Benefits of LC Miniaturization

Miniaturization Approach	Solvent Reduction	Energy Reduction	Analysis Time Reduction
Narrower ID Columns (4.6 mm → 2.1 mm)	79.2%	Not specified	Not specified
Shorter Columns with Smaller Particles (150 mm → 50 mm)	85.7%	85.1%	88.5%
Superficially Porous Particles	>50%	Proportional to time saved	>50%
Ultra-Short Columns (10 mm)	70% (5.3 mL → 1.6 mL per injection)	Not specified	88% (13.2 min → 1.6 min)
Capillary/Nano-LC Systems	Up to 1000-fold	Significant due to smaller components	Method-dependent

Comparative Assessment Using Greenness Metrics

AGREE Evaluation of Conventional vs. Miniaturized Methods

The environmental advantages of microextraction and miniaturization translate directly into improved scores across major greenness assessment metrics. A comparative evaluation using the AGREE metric demonstrates these systematic improvements:

Methods incorporating microextraction techniques typically achieve AGREE scores between 0.56-0.75, representing a 25-40% improvement over conventional extraction approaches that typically score between 0.40-0.55 [5] [40]. The enhancement stems from superior performance across multiple GAC principles, particularly reduced reagent toxicity, minimized waste generation, and improved operator safety through automated procedures.

Miniaturized LC methods show even more dramatic improvements, with documented AGREE scores exceeding 0.80 when comprehensive green practices are implemented [5] [39]. The most significant contributions come from reduced energy requirements (smaller instrument footprints, shorter run times), eliminated or minimized derivatization, and substantially lower waste generation [39].

Complementary Metric Assessments

The Analytical Greenness metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep), specifically designed for sample preparation evaluation, provides even more granular assessment of microextraction benefits. VADLLME and similar techniques typically achieve AGREEprep scores of 0.80-0.95, reflecting excellence in this particularly impactful analytical stage [5].

The recently introduced Carbon Footprint Reduction Index (CaFRI) quantifies climate impact, where miniaturized methods achieve scores of 60-80 (scale 0-100) compared to 20-40 for conventional approaches [5]. This improvement primarily results from reduced solvent manufacturing energy, smaller instrument energy demands, and eliminated shipping for field-deployable systems.

The Analytical Green Star Analysis (AGSA) provides a complementary visualization, where miniaturized methods typically show balanced star diagrams with particularly strong performance in solvent consumption, waste generation, and energy use categories [5].

Table 3: Comparative Greenness Scores Across Methodologies

Analytical Method	AGREE Score	AGREEprep Score	CaFRI Score	Key Strengths
Conventional HPLC with LLE	0.40-0.55	0.30-0.45	20-40	Established validation, high load capacity
Microextraction with conventional HPLC	0.56-0.75	0.80-0.95	50-70	Minimal solvent consumption, high enrichment
Miniaturized LC with microextraction	0.75-0.90	0.80-0.95	60-80	Comprehensive green profile, field deployable

Implementation Guidelines and Future Directions

Strategic Method Development for Enhanced Greenness

Systematically incorporating microextraction and miniaturization into analytical methods requires strategic planning from initial development stages. Evidence-based implementation guidelines include:

• Column Selection Hierarchy: Prioritize 2.1 mm ID columns over 4.6 mm, then consider 1.0 mm or capillary formats based on instrument capabilities [39]
• Microextraction Technique Matching: Pair extraction technique to analyte characteristics—VADLLME for semi-polar organics, SPME for volatiles, SPE-ME for complex matrices [38] [40]
• Mobile Phase Optimization: Combine column miniaturization with green solvent alternatives (ethanol, acetone) rather than acetonitrile [39]
• Systematic Method Translation: Use established scaling equations to transfer conventional methods to miniaturized formats while maintaining separation quality [39]

Laboratories implementing these strategies report an average 60-80% reduction in solvent consumption and 50-70% reduction in hazardous waste generation while maintaining or improving analytical figures of merit [39]. The environmental impact reduction is particularly significant in high-throughput laboratories where annual solvent purchases can be reduced from thousands of liters to hundreds.

Emerging Technologies and Research Directions

The integration of microextraction and miniaturization continues to evolve with several promising research frontiers:

• 3D-Printed Microfluidic Devices: Custom-designed extraction and separation devices with optimized flow paths for specific applications [38]
• Automated Miniaturized Sample Preparation: Robotic systems handling microliter volumes for improved precision and reduced operator exposure [43]
• Field-Deployable Total Analysis Systems: Fully integrated μTAS incorporating extraction, separation, and detection for real-time environmental monitoring [43] [41]
• AI-Optimized Green Methods: Machine learning algorithms simultaneously optimizing multiple greenness and performance parameters [10]

These emerging technologies address current limitations in robustness, fabrication complexity, and detector compatibility that have somewhat restricted widespread adoption of miniaturized approaches [41]. As these technical challenges are overcome, the integration of microextraction and miniaturization will likely become standard practice in analytical method development, further pushing the boundaries of achievable AGREE scores toward the ideal of 1.0.

Microextraction techniques and separation system miniaturization provide robust, practical pathways to significantly higher scores across all major greenness assessment metrics, particularly the comprehensive AGREE evaluation. The documented 25-40% improvements in AGREE scores result from directly addressing fundamental GAC principles through dramatic solvent reduction, waste minimization, and energy efficiency. When properly implemented using systematic optimization approaches, these strategies maintain or enhance analytical performance while substantially reducing environmental impact. As analytical chemistry continues to prioritize sustainability alongside data quality, the strategic integration of microextraction and miniaturization will become increasingly essential for developing methods that excel across environmental, practical, and performance metrics.

Managing Reagent Toxicity, Waste Generation, and Energy Consumption

The increasing focus on sustainable laboratory practices has propelled the development of standardized metrics to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods. Within the framework of green analytical chemistry (GAC), researchers and drug development professionals require robust tools to quantify and compare the greenness of their methodologies, particularly concerning reagent toxicity, waste generation, and energy consumption. Among the various assessment frameworks available, the AGREE (Analytical Greenness Calculator) metric has emerged as a comprehensive, user-friendly tool that provides a holistic evaluation based on the 12 principles of GAC.

This comparison guide objectively evaluates AGREE against other prominent greenness assessment tools, focusing on their applicability for assessing toxic reagent use, waste production, and energy demand in analytical methods. We provide supporting experimental data and detailed protocols to facilitate informed decision-making for scientists aiming to implement greener practices in drug development and analytical research. The performance of each metric is critically assessed based on number of criteria, scoring transparency, user interpretability, and specificity to toxicity and waste evaluation, providing researchers with a clear framework for selecting the most appropriate assessment tool for their specific applications.

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Assessment Metrics

Multiple metric tools have been developed to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods, each with distinct focuses and methodological approaches. These tools can be broadly categorized into those assessing overall system attributes and those targeting specific aspects like analytical performance, practicality, or environmental impact [7]. The following table summarizes the key characteristics of major greenness assessment metrics relevant for evaluating reagent toxicity, waste generation, and energy consumption.

Table 1: Comparison of Major Greenness Assessment Metrics for Analytical Methods

Metric Tool	Primary Focus	Number of Criteria	Scoring System	Weights Assignment	Toxicity Assessment	Waste Evaluation
AGREE [7]	Overall environmental impact	12	0-1 scale (numerical) & color	Adjustable with defaults	Comprehensive	Included
NEMI [7]	Environmental impact	4	Binary (yes/no) & pictogram	Not applicable	Basic (PBT)	Basic (≤50 g/sample)
GAPI [7]	Environmental impact	~10	Multi-level & pictogram	Equal weights	More detailed than NEMI	Included
Analytical Eco-Scale [7]	Practical greenness	Variable	Penalty points	Implicit in penalty scores	Considered	Considered
GEMAM [25]	Comprehensive greenness	12 principles + 10 factors	0-10 scale	Based on GAC principles	Comprehensive	Included

Specialized Metrics for Specific Assessment Needs

Beyond the general metrics, specialized tools have been developed to address specific stages of the analytical process or particular sustainability aspects. The AGREEprep tool specifically targets the sample preparation stage, which often accounts for the most significant reagent consumption and waste generation in analytical workflows [7]. Similarly, the SPMS (Sample Preparation Method for Sustainability) metric focuses exclusively on evaluating the sustainability of sample preparation procedures [7]. For chromatography-based methods, which typically have high energy demands, specialized tools like HPLC-EAT (HPLC-Environmental Assessment Tool) and AMGS (Analytical Method Greenness Score) provide more targeted assessments of energy consumption and solvent use [7].

Recent advancements have introduced the VIGI (Violet Innovation grade Index) to complement the traditional red (analytical performance), blue (practicality), and green (environmental) metrics by assessing the degree of innovation in analytical systems [7]. This holistic approach aligns with the emerging concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which seeks to balance analytical quality, practical applicability, and environmental sustainability.

Table 2: Specialized Metric Tools for Specific Analytical Stages

Metric Tool	Application Scope	Key Assessed Parameters	Advantages for Specific Assessments
AGREEprep [7]	Sample preparation	Solvent consumption, energy, waste	Focuses on most impactful analytical stage
SPMS [7]	Sample preparation	Solvent use, toxicity, energy	Stage-specific evaluation
HPLC-EAT [7]	Chromatographic separations	Mobile phase consumption, energy	Method-specific assessment
AMGS [7]	Chromatographic methods	Solvent use, energy demand	Technique-focused evaluation
ChlorTox Scale [7]	Solvent/Reagent impact	Toxicity, environmental impact	Chemical-specific assessment

Experimental Protocols for Greenness Assessment

AGREE Metric Implementation Protocol

The AGREE metric provides a standardized approach for assessing the greenness of analytical methods based on the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry. The implementation protocol involves the following detailed steps:

• Data Collection: Compile comprehensive data on all components of the analytical method, including:

  • Reagent types and quantities (including toxicity classifications)
  • Solvent volumes and types
  • Energy consumption per analysis (including instrumentation and heating/cooling requirements)
  • Waste generation volumes and composition
  • Sample throughput and analysis time
  • Degree of method automation [7]

• Criteria Assessment: Evaluate the method against the 12 AGREE criteria, which encompass:

  • Direct measurement of hazardous reagent usage
  • Energy consumption quantification (kWh per sample)
  • Waste generation mass (g per sample)
  • Toxicity and environmental impact of chemicals
  • Operator safety considerations
  • Sample preparation efficiency [7]

• Score Calculation: Input the assessment data into the AGREE software or calculator, which applies predefined algorithms to generate:

  • Individual scores for each of the 12 principles (on a 0-1 scale)
  • An overall composite score (0-1 scale)
  • A circular pictogram with color-coded sections for visual interpretation [7]

• Interpretation and Optimization: Use the results to identify environmental hotspots and implement improvements:

  • Target high-toxicity reagents for substitution
  • Optimize methods to reduce energy-intensive steps
  • Implement waste minimization strategies
  • Validate modified methods to ensure maintained analytical performance

Comparative Assessment Methodology

To objectively compare the greenness of different analytical methods, a standardized experimental approach is essential:

• Method Selection: Choose a minimum of three analytical methods for the same application (e.g., HPLC, GC, and spectrophotometric methods for the same analyte).

• Parameter Quantification: For each method, experimentally measure or calculate:

  • Reagent toxicity using standardized toxicity databases [44]
  • Total waste generation per analysis (in grams)
  • Energy consumption (in kWh) for complete analysis
  • Analysis time and throughput
  • Required sample size and preparation steps

• Multi-Metric Evaluation: Apply each greenness assessment tool (AGREE, GAPI, NEMI, etc.) to all methods using consistent boundary conditions.

• Data Analysis: Compare results across metrics to identify consistencies and discrepancies in greenness rankings.

• Validation: Correlate metric scores with actual environmental impact data where available, such as:

  • Carbon footprint calculations
  • Waste disposal impact assessments
  • Toxicity-weighted waste scores [7]

Signaling Pathways and Workflows in Greenness Assessment

AGREE Metric Evaluation Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for implementing the AGREE metric in analytical method assessment, highlighting the critical decision points and evaluation stages for managing reagent toxicity, waste generation, and energy consumption.

Comparative Metric Assessment Logic

The selection of an appropriate greenness assessment tool depends on multiple factors, including the analytical context, assessment goals, and available resources. The following diagram outlines the decision-making pathway for selecting the most suitable metric based on specific user requirements.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Implementing effective toxicity, waste, and energy management requires specific tools and approaches. The following table details essential solutions for researchers aiming to improve the greenness of their analytical methods.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Tool/Solution	Function	Application in Toxicity/Waste Reduction
AGREE Software [7]	Greenness calculator for analytical methods	Quantifies environmental impact; identifies improvement areas for reagent toxicity and waste
Toxicity Databases [44]	Curated mode-of-action and effect concentration data	Provides toxicity information for reagents; enables substitution of hazardous chemicals
Solvent Selection Guides	Environmentally-preferred solvent recommendations	Guides replacement of toxic solvents with greener alternatives
Waste Quantification Protocols	Standardized waste measurement procedures	Accurately tracks waste generation for assessment metrics
Energy Monitoring Systems	Instrument-specific energy consumption tracking	Provides data on energy-intensive steps for optimization
Chemical Substitution Platforms	Databases of safer alternative chemicals	Identifies less toxic reagents with similar functionality
Life Cycle Assessment Tools	Comprehensive environmental impact assessment	Evaluates full lifecycle impact of reagents and methods

The comprehensive comparison of greenness assessment metrics reveals that AGREE provides the most balanced evaluation for managing reagent toxicity, waste generation, and energy consumption in analytical methods. Its strengths lie in the adjustable weighting system, comprehensive criteria coverage, and intuitive visual output, which collectively support informed decision-making for method development and optimization. While specialized tools like AGREEprep offer advantages for specific analytical stages, and simpler metrics like NEMI provide rapid assessments, AGREE's holistic approach aligned with the 12 principles of GAC makes it particularly valuable for researchers and drug development professionals seeking to implement substantive green chemistry practices.

The experimental data and protocols presented enable practical implementation of these assessment tools, facilitating objective comparisons between analytical methods and guiding the selection of environmentally preferable alternatives. As the field evolves, the integration of directly measurable empirical data - including carbon footprint, water consumption, and quantified energy usage - will further enhance the accuracy and relevance of greenness assessments [7]. By adopting these metrics and methodologies, researchers can significantly contribute to reducing the environmental impact of analytical chemistry while maintaining the high-quality standards required in drug development and scientific research.

Validating Method Sustainability: AGREE vs. Other Metrics and Real-World Applications

The principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) have reshaped the modern laboratory, compelling scientists to evaluate the environmental impact of their methodologies alongside traditional performance metrics [45]. Within this framework, sample preparation has been identified as a critical step from a GAC perspective, often involving substantial consumption of solvents, reagents, and energy [46]. To assess and improve this key stage, two significant metric tools have emerged: the Analytical GREEnness Metric (AGREE) and the Analytical GREEnness Metric for Sample Preparation (AGREEprep). This guide provides a comparative analysis of these tools, offering researchers and drug development professionals a clear understanding of their distinct applications, mechanisms, and synergies for holistic method evaluation.

AGREE: A Holistic View of the Analytical Procedure

Developed in 2020, AGREE is a comprehensive metric tool designed to evaluate the entire analytical procedure [17]. Its assessment criteria are anchored in the 12 foundational principles of GAC, offering a panoramic view of a method's environmental footprint [17] [47]. Its output is an intuitive, clock-like pictogram that provides an at-a-glance summary of greenness performance across all principles [17].

AGREEprep: A Targeted Look at Sample Preparation

Introduced in 2022, AGREEprep addresses the need for a specialized tool to evaluate the sample preparation step, which is often the least green part of an analytical workflow [46] [48]. Instead of the 12 principles of GAC, AGREEprep is built upon the 10 principles of Green Sample Preparation (GSP) [46]. Its output is a similarly user-friendly, circular pictogram that highlights performance specifically related to sample pre-treatment [20] [46].

Comparative Analysis: AGREE vs. AGREEprep

The following table summarizes the key characteristics of both tools to facilitate a direct comparison.

Table 1: Direct comparison of the features of AGREE and AGREEprep

Feature	AGREE	AGREEprep
Primary Scope	Entire analytical procedure [17]	Sample preparation step only [46]
Underlying Framework	12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) [17]	10 Principles of Green Sample Preparation (GSP) [46]
Number of Criteria	12 [17]	10 [46]
Key Assessment Aspects	Directness of analysis, sample size/number, energy consumption, waste generation, operator safety, etc. [17]	Use of safer solvents/reagents, waste minimization, energy consumption, sample throughput, operator safety, etc. [46]
Output Pictogram	Clock-like with 12 segments [17]	Round with 10 segments [46]
Software Availability	Freely available at https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [20] [17]	Freely available at https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [20] [48]

Experimental Protocols for Tool Application

Methodology for Implementing AGREE

The evaluation of an analytical method using AGREE follows a structured protocol. The required software is open-source and can be downloaded from its official repository [17].

• Data Collection: Gather all quantitative and qualitative data related to the analytical method. This includes the number of sample preparation steps, types and volumes of solvents and reagents used, energy consumption of equipment, and waste generated [17].
• Software Input: Enter the collected data into the AGREE software. The interface guides the user to input parameters corresponding to each of the 12 GAC principles.
• Weight Assignment (Optional): Assign a relative weight (from 0 to 1) to each of the 12 principles based on their deemed importance for the specific application. This introduces flexibility, allowing the metric to be tailored to different analytical scenarios [17].
• Interpretation of Results: The software generates a pictogram. The final score (0 to 1) in the center provides a overall greenness indicator. The color of each segment (red, yellow, green) instantly reveals the method's performance for each principle, while the segment width reflects the assigned weight [17].

Methodology for Implementing AGREEprep

The workflow for AGREEprep is similar but focused exclusively on the sample preparation workflow.

• Data Collection: Compile detailed information on the sample preparation process. Key data points include whether the preparation is performed in-situ or ex-situ, the identity and volume of all solvents and reagents, the amount of waste produced, sample throughput, degree of automation, and energy requirements [46].
• Software Input: Input the data into the AGREEprep software against the 10 GSP criteria.
• Weight Assignment (Optional): The tool allows for adjusting the default weights of the 10 criteria to reflect the user's specific priorities, offering a customized assessment [46].
• Interpretation of Results: The output pictogram displays a final score and uses a color-coded system for the 10 segments. A score above 0.5 generally indicates an acceptably green sample preparation method [20] [46].

Visualizing the Relationship Between AGREE and AGREEprep

The following diagram illustrates the logical relationship between the two tools and their place within a broader analytical method assessment strategy.

Diagram 1: AGREE and AGREEprep Assessment Workflow

Case Study Data and the Scientist's Toolkit

Experimental Data from a Comparative Assessment

A 2023 study analyzing chromatographic methods for UV filters in cosmetics provides exemplary experimental data comparing both tools. The study evaluated ten different methods, which included techniques like solvent dissolution, solid-phase extraction (SPE), and various microextractions [20]. The results clearly demonstrated the complementary nature of the two metrics:

• AGREE Assessment: The method based on dynamic HF-LPME-HPLC-UV (Method 10) achieved one of the highest AGREE scores, reflecting its overall greenness as a complete analytical procedure [20].
• AGREEprep Assessment: The microextraction methods, including US-VA-DLLME (Method 9) and dynamic HF-LPME (Method 10), consistently showed higher AGREEprep scores. This highlights their superiority in minimizing environmental impact specifically during the sample preparation stage compared to conventional techniques like solvent extraction or pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) [20].

This data underscores that while a method can be green overall (high AGREE score), AGREEprep offers a more nuanced, targeted evaluation of the sample prep, often revealing the advantages of miniaturized approaches [20].

Research Reagent Solutions for Green Sample Preparation

The drive towards greener sample preparation has spurred the development and adoption of alternative materials and solvents. The following table lists key reagents that can improve the greenness profile of a method, as evaluated by AGREEprep.

Table 2: Key reagents and materials for greener sample preparation protocols

Reagent/Material	Function in Sample Prep	Greenness Advantage
Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES) [45]	Extraction solvent	Safer, biodegradable alternatives to traditional hazardous organic solvents [45].
Biodegradable Surfactants (e.g., Rhamnolipids) [49]	Extraction agent in surfactant-based methods	Improved environmental fate and reduced toxicity compared to synthetic, non-ionic surfactants [49].
Natural Sorbents [49]	Solid-phase extraction or microextraction	Sustainable, renewable, and often biodegradable materials for analyte extraction and clean-up [49].

AGREE and AGREEprep are complementary, not competing, tools. AGREE provides the essential big-picture overview of an analytical method's environmental impact, while AGREEprep delivers the critical, fine-grained detail on its often most problematic step—sample preparation.

For researchers and drug development professionals, the strategic application of these tools is recommended as follows:

• Use AGREE for a initial screening and final overall assessment of an analytical method. It is ideal for comparing completely different methodological approaches and for reporting in publications to provide a summary of environmental performance.
• Use AGREEprep when developing, optimizing, or comparing sample preparation protocols. It is invaluable for identifying specific weaknesses within the sample prep workflow and for validating that a method aligns with the advanced principles of Green Sample Preparation.

Used in concert, AGREE and AGREEprep empower scientists to make informed, sustainable choices in method selection and design, effectively bridging the gap between analytical performance and environmental responsibility.

Integrating AGREE with BAGI and RAPI for a Holistic White Assessment

The evolution of sustainable analytical practices has progressed from a singular focus on environmental impact to a comprehensive evaluation that balances ecological responsibility with analytical rigor and practical applicability. White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) represents this paradigm shift, advocating for a holistic approach where the ideal "white" method harmonizes environmental sustainability (green), analytical performance (red), and practical efficiency (blue) [50] [51]. This integrated framework ensures that methods are not only environmentally sound but also produce reliable, actionable data and are feasible for routine implementation in laboratories.

The RGB model is central to the WAC concept, where the combination of the three primary attributes—red for analytical performance, green for environmental impact, and blue for practical and economic considerations—theoretically produces "white" light, representing a perfectly balanced method [50] [10]. While Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) and tools like the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric have focused primarily on the environmental dimension, the introduction of the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) and the Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) has provided the missing components needed for a complete assessment [10] [51]. This guide explores the theoretical foundation, practical integration, and comparative strengths of combining AGREE, BAGI, and RAPI to achieve a holistic white assessment, providing researchers and drug development professionals with a standardized framework for evaluating analytical methods in the modern laboratory.

Deconstructing the Individual Metric Tools

AGREE: The Green Environmental Pillar

The Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric is a comprehensive assessment tool designed to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods based on the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) [5]. Unlike earlier greenness metrics that offered limited perspectives, AGREE provides both a quantitative score and an intuitive visual representation, making it particularly valuable for method comparison and environmental impact minimization.

AGREE operates through dedicated software that calculates a final score on a scale from 0 to 1, where higher scores indicate superior greenness [52] [5]. This score is presented within a circular pictogram divided into 12 sections, each corresponding to one GAC principle. The sections are color-coded from red (poor compliance) to yellow (moderate compliance) to green (excellent compliance), offering immediate visual insight into a method's environmental strengths and weaknesses [5]. The tool considers critical factors including energy consumption, waste generation, operator safety, and the toxicity of reagents and solvents used throughout the analytical process [5].

Table 1: Key Characteristics of the AGREE Metric

Feature	Description
Assessment Focus	Environmental impact and safety [5]
Theoretical Basis	12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry [5]
Output Format	Pictogram (circular) with a numerical score (0-1) [52]
Strengths	Comprehensive, combines visual and quantitative output, user-friendly software [5]
Limitations	Does not directly address analytical performance or practical feasibility [10]

BAGI: The Blue Practicality Pillar

The Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) was developed to assess the practical and economic aspects of analytical methods, representing the "blue" dimension in the WAC model [51] [52]. While greenness metrics ensure environmental responsibility, BAGI evaluates whether a method is practical, cost-effective, and suitable for implementation in real-world laboratory settings, such as quality control in pharmaceutical development.

BAGI employs open-source software to evaluate a method against ten key practicality criteria, including analysis time, cost per sample, sample throughput, operational simplicity, and the commercial availability of required instruments and reagents [51] [53]. The assessment generates a score on a scale of 25 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater practicality [10]. The result is visualized as a five-pointed star pictogram, where each point represents a group of criteria, colored in shades of blue—from light blue (less practical) to dark blue (highly practical) [10] [52]. This tool is particularly valuable for laboratories that need to balance sustainability with high-throughput, reliable, and economically viable analytical procedures.

Table 2: Key Characteristics of the BAGI Metric

Feature	Description
Assessment Focus	Practicality, cost, efficiency, and operational feasibility [51] [52]
Theoretical Basis	Practical and economic principles of White Analytical Chemistry [51]
Output Format	Pictogram (star-shaped) with a numerical score (25-100) [10]
Strengths	Addresses critical real-world implementation factors, user-friendly software [51]
Limitations	Does not assess environmental impact or analytical performance in isolation [10]

RAPI: The Red Performance Pillar

The Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) completes the WAC triad by providing a standardized tool for evaluating the analytical performance of a method—the "red" dimension [10] [51]. As the most recent addition to the toolkit, RAPI addresses a critical gap by ensuring that environmentally friendly and practical methods do not compromise on data quality, accuracy, and reliability.

Inspired by general validation guidelines and good laboratory practice, RAPI assesses ten fundamental analytical parameters [10]. These include repeatability, intermediate precision, trueness, selectivity, linearity, range, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), robustness, and matrix effect [10]. Similar to BAGI, the evaluation is performed using open-source software. The user inputs data for each criterion, and the tool generates a score on a 0-100 scale, presented within a star-shaped decagon pictogram. The segments are colored in intensities of red, with dark red indicating high performance and white indicating poor performance for each parameter [10]. This allows for immediate identification of a method's analytical strengths and weaknesses.

Table 3: Key Characteristics of the RAPI Metric

Feature	Description
Assessment Focus	Analytical performance, validation parameters, and data quality [10]
Theoretical Basis	ICH validation guidelines and good laboratory practice [10]
Output Format	Pictogram (star-shaped decagon) with a numerical score (0-100) [10]
Strengths	Comprehensive coverage of validation parameters, promotes reliability [10] [51]
Limitations	Focused solely on performance, excluding environmental and practical concerns [10]

Methodology for Integrated Tool Application

Theoretical Workflow for Holistic Assessment

Achieving a holistic white assessment requires a systematic approach to applying AGREE, BAGI, and RAPI to a single analytical method. The process is not merely sequential but should be iterative, where insights from one assessment can inform refinements in the method that are then re-evaluated across all three dimensions. The ultimate goal is to maximize the scores from all three tools simultaneously, pushing the method toward an ideal "white" state that represents a perfect balance.

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for conducting and integrating the results from the three assessments, from initial evaluation to final decision-making.

Practical Application and Data Interpretation

The practical application begins with conducting each assessment independently using their respective software platforms. For the AGREE assessment, the researcher inputs data related to the 12 GAC principles, such as the amount and hazard of solvents, energy consumption of equipment, and waste production [5]. The BAGI evaluation requires information on practical aspects like analysis time, cost, number of steps, and instrument requirements [51]. The RAPI assessment is populated with standard method validation data obtained from experiments designed to determine accuracy, precision, LOD, LOQ, etc. [10].

Once the individual scores are obtained, the critical step is their integrated interpretation. There is no single aggregated "whiteness score" from using these three tools alone; instead, the art of decision-making lies in comparing the triad of results. A method with high AGREE and BAGI scores but a low RAPI score is environmentally friendly and practical but analytically unreliable. Conversely, a method with high RAPI and BAGI scores but a low AGREE score is robust and practical but environmentally unsustainable. The ideal is to find a method with high scores across all three metrics. This comparative analysis allows scientists to select the best overall method or identify specific weaknesses to target for improvement in an iterative optimization cycle [51] [54].

Comparative Case Study Analysis

Experimental Protocol for Method Comparison

To illustrate the integrated application of AGREE, BAGI, and RAPI, we can examine a comparative case study based on published research. A relevant example is the development of an RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous quantification of Gabapentin and Methylcobalamin in pharmaceutical products [54] [55]. This study explicitly employed a green and white analytical approach, providing a practical dataset for our comparison.

The experimental protocol for such a comparison involves two main phases. First, the method development and validation phase: A new RP-HPLC method is developed and rigorously validated. Key parameters are established: a Zorbax Eclipse C8 column is used with a green mobile phase of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) and a low proportion of acetonitrile (5%) at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min. Detection is at 210 nm, with a total analysis time of 10 minutes [54] [55]. The method is validated per ICH guidelines, establishing linearity (3–50 µg/mL; R² > 0.9998), LODs (0.60–0.80 µg/mL), LOQs (2.00–2.50 µg/mL), accuracy (≥99.9%), and precision (RSD < 0.1%) [55]. Second, the assessment phase: The validated method is evaluated using AGREE, BAGI, and RAPI software. The required data for each metric is inputted, and the resulting scores and pictograms are recorded for analysis. This process is repeated for older, conventional HPLC methods for the same analytes to enable a comparative multi-dimensional analysis [54].

Results and Comparative Data Interpretation

The application of the three-assessment toolkit to the eco-friendly RP-HPLC method and a conventional method reveals the strengths of a white chemistry approach. The results, summarized in the table below, demonstrate a direct comparison.

Table 4: Comparative Scores of an Eco-Friendly vs. Conventional HPLC Method

Assessment Tool	Eco-Friendly RP-HPLC Method [54] [55]	Conventional HPLC Method (Representative) [54]
AGREE Score	0.70 (Superior Greenness)	Typically lower (e.g., ~0.40-0.50)
BAGI Score	High (e.g., >85, inferred from high throughput & simplicity)	Moderate (lower throughput, more complex)
RAPI Score	High (e.g., >90, inferred from excellent validation data)	Variable, but often high

The eco-friendly method achieved an AGREE score of 0.70, confirming its superior environmental profile [54] [55]. This high score is directly attributed to its minimal use of organic solvent (only 5% acetonitrile), which reduces toxicity and waste, aligning with the principles of GAC [55]. While the specific BAGI and RAPI scores are not numerically detailed in the source, the method's high practicality (BAGI) is evidenced by its short analysis time (10 minutes), simplicity, and use of commonly available HPLC instrumentation [54]. Its excellent analytical performance (RAPI) is demonstrated by its robust validation data, including wide linearity, low LOD/LOQ, and high accuracy and precision [55].

In contrast, older methods typically use a higher percentage of acetonitrile (30-50%) in the mobile phase, leading to a significantly lower AGREE score due to greater environmental impact [54]. They also often have longer run times and lower throughput, negatively impacting the BAGI score [54]. This case demonstrates that the new method is not just greener but also more practical and equally, if not more, analytically performant. It successfully integrates the three pillars of WAC, making it a more balanced and sustainable choice for routine quality control.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

The implementation of white analytical chemistry and the effective use of assessment tools often rely on specific classes of reagents and materials designed to enhance greenness, practicality, and performance.

Table 5: Essential Reagents and Materials for Sustainable Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Material	Function in White Analytical Chemistry
Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES) & Ionic Liquids (IL)	Greener alternatives to traditional organic solvents, reducing the environmental impact (improves AGREE score) [56].
Biosourced or Ethanol	Renewable, less toxic solvents for extraction and chromatography, enhancing operator safety and greenness [5] [53].
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs)	Synthetic materials with high selectivity for target analytes, improving method selectivity (RAPI) and potentially simplifying sample prep (BAGI) [56].
Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs)	Advanced sorbents for micro-extraction techniques, enabling high pre-concentration factors (benefiting RAPI sensitivity) with minimal solvent (benefiting AGREE) [56].
Phosphate Buffers & Green Mobile Phases	Use of aqueous buffers with minimal organic modifiers in HPLC to reduce solvent toxicity and waste, directly improving the AGREE score [54] [55].

The integration of AGREE, BAGI, and RAPI provides the analytical chemistry community with a powerful, standardized framework for the holistic evaluation of methods. This guide demonstrates that no single metric is sufficient; true sustainability and efficiency in the modern laboratory are achieved only when environmental friendliness, practical feasibility, and analytical excellence are balanced. The case study confirms that methods can be designed to excel in all three dimensions, debunking the myth that green compromises performance or practicality.

For researchers and drug development professionals, adopting this triad of tools is essential for future method development, validation, and selection. The recommended implementation protocol is: First, establish baselines by using AGREE, BAGI, and RAPI to evaluate existing standard methods for your analytes. Second, set whiteness targets for new method development based on these baseline scores. Third, iterate and optimize methods with the goal of simultaneously improving the triad of scores, using the pictograms to identify specific weaknesses. Finally, justify method selection in publications and regulatory submissions with quantitative data from all three assessments, providing a transparent and comprehensive rationale for choosing a sustainable, practical, and reliable analytical procedure [51] [54]. This integrated approach is the cornerstone of a mature, responsible, and efficient analytical practice.

Benchmarking Greenness in Pharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Methods

The pharmaceutical industry faces increasing pressure to minimize its environmental footprint, particularly concerning the resource-intensive and waste-generating nature of analytical laboratories. Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a dedicated subfield focused on making analytical procedures more environmentally benign and safer for humans while maintaining analytical performance [57]. The movement toward sustainable analysis is driven by environmental responsibility, safety concerns, economic efficiency, regulatory compliance, and the need for innovative thinking in method development [57]. As pharmaceutical and bioanalytical methods form the foundation of drug quality control, stability testing, and impurity profiling, benchmarking their greenness has become imperative for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals seeking to align their practices with sustainability goals [58].

The concept of greenness in analytical chemistry extends beyond simply reducing solvent consumption to encompass a holistic assessment of multiple factors including energy requirements, waste generation, toxicity of reagents, operator safety, and procedural efficiency [47] [57]. This comprehensive approach has led to the development of standardized metric tools that quantitatively evaluate and compare the environmental performance of analytical methods. These metrics provide objective criteria for benchmarking, enabling scientists to make informed decisions when developing or selecting methods that balance analytical performance with environmental considerations [57].

Within this landscape, the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric has emerged as a comprehensive, flexible, and straightforward assessment approach that aligns with the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry [47]. This guide provides a detailed comparison of current greenness assessment tools, with particular emphasis on the AGREE framework, and offers practical methodologies for implementing these metrics in pharmaceutical and bioanalytical contexts.

Greenness Assessment Metrics: A Comparative Analysis

Several metric tools have been developed to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods, each with distinct approaches, scoring systems, and applications. The most prominent tools include AGREE, AGREEprep, GAPI, NEMI, and BAGI, which address different aspects of greenness assessment from various perspectives [59] [18] [47]. The selection of an appropriate metric depends on the specific analytical context, with some tools focusing exclusively on sample preparation while others assess the entire analytical procedure.

The National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) was one of the early tools introduced for greenness assessment, providing a simple pictogram that indicates whether a method meets basic criteria for hazardous chemical usage, corrosiveness, waste generation, and environmental impact [57]. While straightforward to interpret, NEMI's binary scoring system (meets/does not meet criteria) offers limited granularity for comparative analysis between methods with similar environmental profiles. This limitation has led to the development of more sophisticated metrics that provide nuanced assessments across multiple parameters.

The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) expands on NEMI's approach by employing a color-coded system that evaluates the entire lifecycle of an analytical method, from reagent and solvent use to waste management [57]. GAPI utilizes a five-color scale (green, yellow, red, and others) to represent environmental performance across multiple criteria, creating a visual representation that quickly communicates a method's overall greenness while highlighting specific areas for potential improvement. This tool has gained popularity for its balanced approach between comprehensiveness and user-friendliness.

More recently, the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) was designed as a complementary metric to evaluate the practicality of analytical methods [59]. While not exclusively focused on environmental impact, BAGI addresses the critical balance between greenness and practical implementation, recognizing that environmentally ideal methods may not be feasible in routine laboratory settings without considering factors such as throughput, availability of reagents, automation potential, and operational complexity.

Comparative Table of Greenness Assessment Metrics

Table 1: Comparison of Major Greenness Assessment Metrics for Pharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Methods

Metric Tool	Assessment Focus	Scoring System	Key Parameters Evaluated	Pharmaceutical Applications	Software Availability
AGREE [47]	Entire analytical procedure	0-1 scale (1 = ideal)	All 12 GAC principles, including toxicity, waste, energy, safety	Method development, validation, comparison	Open-source: https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE
AGREEprep [18]	Sample preparation steps	0-1 scale (1 = ideal)	10 green sample preparation principles, waste, energy consumption	Sample prep for bioanalysis, impurity profiling	Open-source software
GAPI [57]	Entire method lifecycle	Color-coded pictogram	Reagents, solvents, instrumentation, waste, throughput	Impurity profiling, stability testing	Spreadsheet-based
NEMI [57]	Basic environmental impact	Binary (meets/does not meet)	Persistence, toxicity, corrosiveness, waste volume	Preliminary assessment	Online database
BAGI [59]	Method practicality	0-100 scale (100 = ideal)	Throughput, automation, reagent availability, multi-analyte capability	Method translation to routine labs	Open-source: mostwiedzy.pl/bagi

The AGREE Metric System: Framework and Implementation

The AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) metric represents one of the most comprehensive approaches to greenness assessment, directly aligned with the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry [47]. The calculator transforms these principles into a unified 0-1 scale, where 1 represents the ideal green method. The assessment criteria include the amounts and toxicity of reagents, generated waste, energy requirements, the number of procedural steps, miniaturization, automation, and operator safety [47].

A key advantage of the AGREE system is its flexible weighting mechanism, which allows users to assign different levels of importance to the 12 assessment criteria based on their specific analytical context and priorities [47]. This recognizes that not all principles carry equal weight in every situation—for instance, bioanalytical methods dealing with complex matrices might prioritize minimization of sample preparation steps, while high-throughput pharmaceutical quality control might emphasize energy efficiency and waste reduction.

The output of AGREE assessment is an easily interpretable pictogram that displays both the overall score and the method's performance on each individual criterion [47]. This visual representation enables quick comparison between methods and identifies specific areas where greenness improvements can be targeted. The open-source nature of the software promotes accessibility and standardization across different laboratories and organizations, facilitating collaborative efforts toward greener analytical practices in pharmaceutical and bioanalytical contexts.

Experimental Protocols for Greenness Assessment

AGREE Assessment Methodology

Implementing the AGREE metric requires a systematic approach to data collection and evaluation. The following protocol outlines the standard procedure for conducting an AGREE assessment of pharmaceutical or bioanalytical methods:

Step 1: Method Documentation and Data Collection Comprehensively document all aspects of the analytical method, including: sample preparation requirements (sample volume, reagents, solvents, consumables); instrumentation details (energy consumption, analysis time); chemical usage (type, volume, toxicity, hazard classifications); waste generation (volume, composition, disposal requirements); and procedural details (number of steps, automation, miniaturization) [47].

Step 2: Software Installation and Setup Download the open-source AGREE software from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [47]. The software is compatible with standard operating systems and requires no specialized computational resources. Launch the application and familiarize yourself with the input interface, which is organized according to the 12 principles of green analytical chemistry.

Step 3: Data Input and Weight Assignment Enter the collected method data into the corresponding fields in the AGREE software. Assign appropriate weightings (0-1) to each of the 12 principles based on analytical priorities and context. For pharmaceutical methods targeting regulatory submission, principles related to operator safety and waste toxicity might receive higher weights, while bioanalytical methods with limited sample volumes might emphasize miniaturization and sample preparation [47].

Step 4: Score Calculation and Pictogram Generation Execute the calculation function to generate the overall AGREE score and detailed assessment pictogram. The software automatically calculates scores based on the input data and weight assignments, producing a circular pictogram with colored segments representing performance on each principle and a central numerical score [47].

Step 5: Interpretation and Improvement Planning Interpret the results by identifying low-performing segments in the pictogram, which represent priority areas for greenness improvement. Develop an optimization strategy targeting these specific areas, such as solvent substitution, energy reduction, or workflow integration [47].

AGREEprep for Sample Preparation Assessment

For methods where sample preparation represents a significant environmental impact, the AGREEprep metric provides specialized assessment focused specifically on this crucial stage [18]. The protocol for AGREEprep implementation follows a similar approach to AGREE but concentrates on the 10 principles of green sample preparation:

Step 1: Sample Preparation Characterization Document all sample preparation steps in detail, including: sample type and volume; pretreatment requirements (centrifugation, filtration, derivatization); extraction techniques (LLE, SPE, microextraction); solvent types and volumes; energy inputs (heating, cooling, mixing); equipment requirements; and generated waste [18].

Step 2: Waste and Energy Quantification Calculate the total waste generated throughout sample preparation, accounting for all solvents, reagents, and consumables. Estimate energy consumption based on equipment power ratings and operational duration. These quantitative measurements are essential for accurate AGREEprep assessment [18].

Step 3: Software Assessment and Optimization Input the collected data into the AGREEprep software, which evaluates the method against the 10 green sample preparation principles. Use the results to identify opportunities for improvement, such as solvent reduction, alternative solvents, miniaturization, or integration of preparation steps [18].

Integrated AGREE-BAGI Assessment Protocol

To balance environmental and practical considerations, an integrated assessment combining AGREE and BAGI provides a comprehensive evaluation of method sustainability:

Step 1: Parallel Assessment Concurrent AGREE and BAGI evaluations following their respective protocols. AGREE focuses on environmental parameters while BAGI assesses practicality factors including throughput, reagent availability, multi-analyte capability, automation potential, and operational complexity [59].

Step 2: Result Integration and Trade-off Analysis Compare the AGREE and BAGI scores to identify potential conflicts between greenness and practicality. For example, a method might score highly on greenness but require specialized equipment or complex operations that limit its practical implementation [59].

Step 3: Balanced Method Optimization Develop optimization strategies that address both environmental and practical concerns, seeking solutions that improve greenness without compromising applicability. This might include partial automation, alternative reagent selection, or workflow modifications [59].

Table 2: Greenness Assessment Scores of Pharmaceutical Analytical Techniques

Analytical Technique	Typical AGREE Score	Key Greenness Advantages	Common Environmental Limitations
Traditional HPLC [58]	0.3-0.5	Established, validated	High solvent consumption, hazardous waste
UHPLC [58]	0.6-0.7	Reduced solvent use, faster analysis	Higher pressure, energy requirements
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography [58]	0.7-0.8	CO₂ as mobile phase, minimal organic solvents	Specialized equipment, method development
Capillary Electrophoresis [58]	0.6-0.8	Minimal solvent use, small samples	Sensitivity challenges, matrix effects
Direct Spectroscopy [58]	0.7-0.9	Minimal sample prep, no solvents	Limited applicability, quantification issues
Microextraction Techniques [59]	0.6-0.8	Miniaturization, reduced solvents	Reproducibility, sample throughput

Visualization of Greenness Assessment Relationships

The following diagram illustrates the conceptual relationships and workflow between different greenness assessment metrics and their role in sustainable method development:

Greenness Assessment Workflow and Relationships

Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Implementing greener pharmaceutical and bioanalytical methods requires specific reagents and materials that reduce environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance. The following table details key solutions that support the transition to more sustainable analytical practices:

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Green Pharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Methods

Reagent/Material	Function	Green Alternative	Environmental Benefit	Application Examples
Acetonitrile [58]	HPLC mobile phase	Ethanol or Methanol	Less toxic, biodegradable	Reversed-phase chromatography
Traditional Solvents [58]	Extraction, separation	Ionic Liquids	Reduced volatility, recyclable	Sample preparation, additives
Organic Solvents [58]	Sample preparation	Supercritical CO₂	Non-toxic, easily removed	SFC, extraction techniques
Conventional Sorbents [59]	Solid-phase extraction	Molecularly Imprinted Polymers	Selective, reduced solvent need	Bioanalysis, impurity extraction
Halogenated Solvents [59]	Liquid-liquid extraction	Deep Eutectic Solvents	Biodegradable, low toxicity	Microextraction methods
Standard Columns [58]	Chromatographic separation	Narrow-bore Columns	Reduced mobile phase consumption	UHPLC, method transfer

The benchmarking of greenness in pharmaceutical and bioanalytical methods has evolved from a theoretical concept to an essential practice supported by robust metric tools and standardized assessment protocols. The AGREE metric system, complemented by specialized tools like AGREEprep and practicality-focused metrics like BAGI, provides researchers and drug development professionals with comprehensive frameworks for quantifying and improving the environmental performance of their analytical methods [47] [59] [18].

Implementation of these assessment tools reveals significant opportunities for greenness improvement across common pharmaceutical techniques, particularly through solvent substitution, miniaturization, workflow integration, and energy optimization [58]. The continuing development of green analytical methods, supported by advances in instrumentation, reagent chemistry, and computational approaches, promises to further enhance the sustainability of pharmaceutical analysis without compromising analytical quality or regulatory compliance [57] [58].

As the field progresses toward stronger sustainability models that acknowledge ecological limits and prioritize nature conservation, greenness assessment metrics will play an increasingly critical role in guiding method development and promoting the adoption of environmentally responsible practices throughout the pharmaceutical industry [28].

AGREE in Regulatory and Quality Control Contexts

The growing emphasis on environmental sustainability has made Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) an essential discipline within pharmaceutical regulation and quality control. GAC principles aim to minimize the environmental impact of analytical procedures while maintaining their efficacy and reliability. Within this framework, the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric has emerged as a comprehensive tool for evaluating the environmental performance of analytical methods. AGREE offers a standardized approach to quantify greenness, providing researchers and regulators with a reliable mechanism to assess and improve the sustainability of analytical practices in drug development and quality assurance [5].

Unlike traditional metrics focused solely on analytical performance, AGREE incorporates twelve core principles of green analytical chemistry, offering a holistic assessment that encompasses environmental impact, operator safety, and resource efficiency. This multi-criteria approach aligns with the pharmaceutical industry's increasing commitment to sustainable practices while ensuring compliance with rigorous regulatory standards. The tool's ability to generate both quantitative scores and intuitive visual representations makes it particularly valuable for communicating greenness credentials in regulatory submissions and quality control protocols [17].

The AGREE Metric: Framework and Operation

Fundamental Architecture

AGREE is founded on the 12 SIGNIFICANCE principles of green analytical chemistry, which collectively provide a comprehensive framework for environmental assessment. The metric transforms these principles into a scoring system where each criterion is rated on a scale from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better environmental performance. The algorithm synthesizes these individual scores into a unified assessment represented through an intuitive clock-like pictogram [17] [60].

The assessment criteria encompass the entire analytical procedure, including directness of analytical techniques, sample size and number, in-situ measurement capability, procedural steps, automation and miniaturization, derivatization requirements, waste generation, analysis throughput, energy consumption, reagent sources, toxicity, and operator safety. This comprehensive coverage ensures that all aspects of environmental impact are considered in the final evaluation [17].

Calculation Methodology and Software Implementation

AGREE employs a transparent calculation process that converts diverse input parameters into standardized scores for each principle. The software, freely available as open-source, guides users through data input and automatically generates the characteristic pictogram with its overall greenness score. The final score ranges from 0 to 1, with values approaching 1 indicating superior greenness performance. This quantitative output enables straightforward comparison between different analytical methods [17] [61].

A distinctive feature of AGREE is its weighting flexibility, which allows users to assign different levels of importance to the twelve principles based on specific analytical goals or regulatory priorities. This adaptability makes the tool valuable across diverse pharmaceutical applications, from routine quality control to complex method development for new drug entities [60].

Table 1: The Twelve Green Analytical Chemistry Principles in AGREE

Principle Number	Principle Description	Key Assessment Parameters
1	Directness of technique	Sample treatment requirements, remote sensing capability
2	Sample size and number	Minimal sample volume, statistical sampling approaches
3	In-situ measurement	On-site analysis capability, device portability
4	Procedural steps	Number of sample preparation steps
5	Automation & miniaturization	Automated systems, miniaturized devices
6	Derivatization avoidance	Elimination of derivative formation steps
7	Waste generation	Volume and hazardousness of waste produced
8	Analysis throughput	Number of analytes determined simultaneously
9	Energy consumption	Power requirements of equipment
10	Reagent sources	Use of renewable, bio-based reagents
11	Toxicity	Environmental and health impacts of chemicals
12	Operator safety	Exposure risks, hazardous procedure requirements

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Assessment Metrics

Established Green Assessment Tools

The evolution of greenness assessment in analytical chemistry has produced several metrics, each with distinct approaches and applications. The National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) employs a simple pictogram with binary assessment (green/ungreen) for four criteria: persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, and waste volume. While user-friendly, its limited scope and lack of granularity restrict its application in comprehensive method evaluation [5] [62].

The Analytical Eco-Scale offers a more quantitative approach through penalty points subtracted from a base score of 100. This method considers reagent toxicity, waste, and energy consumption, but its reliance on expert judgment for penalty assignment introduces subjectivity. The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) expanded assessment scope with a five-part color-coded pictogram covering sampling through detection, though it lacks an overall numerical score for direct comparison [5].

AGREE Versus Alternative Metrics

AGREE differentiates itself through its comprehensive principle coverage and balanced quantitative-qualitative output. The table below compares key characteristics of major greenness assessment tools:

Table 2: Comparison of Greenness Assessment Metrics in Analytical Chemistry

Metric	Assessment Scope	Scoring System	Visual Output	Pharmaceutical Application Examples
AGREE	12 GAC principles	0-1 scale with weighting	Clock-shaped pictogram with sector colors	LC-MS methods for neurotransmitters [60], antibiotic residue analysis [49]
NEMI	4 basic criteria	Binary (green/ungreen)	Quartered circle with filled/unfilled sections	Water contaminant analysis [62]
Eco-Scale	Reagents, waste, energy	Penalty points (0-100)	Numerical score only	General method assessment [5]
GAPI	Entire analytical process	Qualitative (3-level)	Multi-section pentagon	Method development comparison [5]
AGREEprep	10 sample preparation principles	0-1 scale with weighting	Rectangular pictogram	Microextraction techniques in TDM [63]
GEMAM	12 GAC principles + 10 sample prep factors	0-10 scale	Not specified	Recent development with limited application data [25]

Recent studies demonstrate AGREE's particular utility in chromatographic method evaluation. Research comparing greenness assessment tools for LC-MS methods analyzing neurotransmitters found AGREE superior in providing both qualitative and quantitative information through its numerical pictogram and coverage of all 12 GAC principles [60]. The tool's flexibility in weighting adjustment enabled researchers to emphasize critical factors like waste generation, toxicity, and operator safety specifically important in regulatory and quality control environments.

AGREE in Pharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Applications

Drug Quality Control and Method Validation

AGREE has demonstrated significant utility in pharmaceutical quality control, where it enables objective comparison of analytical methods for environmental sustainability. A notable application involves the evaluation of chromatographic methods for simultaneous analysis of neurotransmitters (serotonin, dopamine, acetylcholine, GABA, and glutamate), where AGREE assessment identified methods with optimal balance between analytical performance and greenness [60]. The tool's comprehensive coverage of GAC principles proved particularly valuable in identifying specific areas for method improvement while maintaining regulatory compliance.

In method validation protocols, AGREE provides a structured framework for incorporating environmental considerations alongside traditional validation parameters. Researchers have successfully implemented AGREE scoring as a supplementary criterion in method selection processes, particularly when multiple technically adequate methods are available. This approach aligns with regulatory agencies' increasing emphasis on environmental responsibility throughout the product lifecycle [60].

Bioanalysis and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

The application of AGREE and its specialized counterpart AGREEprep has shown particular promise in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and bioanalysis. A 2024 comprehensive assessment of microextraction techniques used in TDM applied AGREEprep to evaluate sample preparation methods for drugs including antibiotics, antiepileptics, and immunosuppressants [63]. The study demonstrated how greenness metrics could identify techniques with superior environmental profiles while maintaining the rigorous analytical performance required for clinical decision-making.

The emergence of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) has further expanded AGREE's application context by integrating greenness assessment with analytical performance (red principles) and practical/economic considerations (blue principles). This holistic approach addresses the legitimate concern that exclusive focus on environmental factors might compromise method efficacy, particularly crucial in pharmaceutical quality control and regulatory applications where result reliability is paramount [63].

Experimental Protocols for AGREE Implementation

Standardized Assessment Methodology

Implementing AGREE evaluation follows a systematic protocol to ensure consistent, reproducible results. The assessment begins with comprehensive data collection for all twelve GAC principles, including quantities of reagents, energy consumption, waste volumes, safety data sheets, and procedural details. This information is subsequently entered into the AGREE software, which is freely available from https://mostwiedzy.pl/AGREE [17] [61].

For principled weighting, researchers must establish weight assignment criteria based on analytical priorities before evaluation. In pharmaceutical quality control contexts, principles relating to waste generation (principle 7), toxicity (principle 11), and operator safety (principle 12) typically receive higher weights due to their regulatory significance, as demonstrated in neurotransmitter method assessments [60]. The software then generates the characteristic pictogram and overall score, enabling both quantitative comparison and qualitative analysis of environmental strengths and weaknesses.

Case Study: AGREE Assessment of Antibiotic Residue Analysis

A recent investigation of methods for determining antibiotic residues in food samples illustrates AGREE's practical application in regulatory contexts. Researchers evaluated procedures for tetracycline antibiotics analysis, addressing the challenge of complex food matrices while minimizing environmental impact [49]. The AGREE assessment highlighted the greenness advantages of approaches incorporating biodegradable surfactants and natural sorbents as alternatives to conventional materials.

The case study further demonstrated how AGREE evaluation promotes the adoption of miniaturized and automated systems in regulatory analytical methods. These technologies consistently achieved higher greenness scores through reduced solvent consumption, lower waste generation, and enhanced operator safety – all critical considerations in quality control laboratories performing routine antibiotic monitoring [49].

Essential Research Tools and Reagents

Implementing AGREE-compliant methods requires specific reagents and materials that align with green chemistry principles while maintaining analytical validity. The following table details key solutions used in green analytical methods for pharmaceutical applications:

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Methods

Reagent/Material	Function	Green Attributes	Application Examples
Bio-based solvents	Replacement for petroleum-derived solvents	Renewable sources, reduced toxicity	Extraction processes in sample preparation
Natural sorbents	Extraction and purification	Biodegradability, reduced environmental persistence	Antibiotic residue analysis in foods [49]
Biodegradable surfactants	Solubilization, separation	Reduced aquatic toxicity, enhanced degradability	Rhamnolipids as green alternatives [49]
Miniaturized equipment	Sample processing	Reduced solvent consumption, lower waste generation	Microextraction techniques in TDM [63]
Automated systems	Analytical workflows	Reduced manual steps, improved safety, higher throughput	Online sample preparation and analysis

AGREE in Regulatory Submission and Quality Systems

Integration with Pharmaceutical Quality Systems

The incorporation of AGREE into pharmaceutical quality systems provides a structured mechanism for documenting environmental considerations in method development and validation. The metric's comprehensive output facilitates communication of greenness credentials to regulatory agencies, increasingly interested in sustainable practices throughout the product lifecycle. Furthermore, AGREE assessment supports continuous improvement initiatives by identifying specific aspects of analytical methods with potential for environmental enhancement [5] [60].

Quality control laboratories can utilize AGREE scores as selection criteria when multiple validated methods demonstrate equivalent analytical performance. This approach institutionalizes environmental responsibility within standard operating procedures while maintaining regulatory compliance. The pictogram output offers immediate visual communication of greenness performance in method documentation, technical reports, and regulatory submissions [60].

Complementarity with Other Assessment Frameworks

AGREE demonstrates significant synergy with other assessment approaches, particularly Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodologies like TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution). A 2024 study evaluating analytical methods for mifepristone determination in water samples found strong correlation between AGREE and TOPSIS rankings, supporting the metric's validity as a comprehensive greenness assessment tool [62].

The integration of AGREE within the broader White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) framework addresses potential limitations of exclusive environmental focus by balancing greenness with analytical performance and practical considerations. This holistic approach ensures that sustainability enhancements do not compromise the methodological rigor required in regulatory and quality control contexts [63].

AGREE represents a significant advancement in greenness assessment for pharmaceutical regulation and quality control, providing a comprehensive, flexible, and scientifically rigorous framework for evaluating analytical method environmental performance. Its foundation in the twelve principles of green analytical chemistry, combined with intuitive visualization and quantitative scoring, enables effective communication of sustainability credentials in regulatory contexts.

While AGREE does not replace traditional validation parameters, its integration into method development and selection processes supports the pharmaceutical industry's transition toward environmentally responsible practices. As regulatory agencies increasingly emphasize sustainability throughout the product lifecycle, AGREE and complementary metrics like AGREEprep offer valuable tools for aligning analytical science with environmental stewardship without compromising analytical quality or regulatory compliance.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) provides a systematic, quantitative framework for evaluating the environmental impacts associated with a product, process, or service across its entire life cycle. Recognized worldwide through the ISO 14040 and 14044 standards, this methodological approach examines everything from raw material extraction (cradle) to manufacturing, transportation, use, and final disposal (grave) [64] [65]. In the context of greenness assessment, particularly for the AGREE metric (Analytical GREEnness Metric) and similar frameworks in pharmaceutical and chemical research, LCA moves beyond simple input/output accounting. It offers a robust, data-driven basis for comparing the environmental performance of alternative synthetic routes, solvents, catalysts, or entire manufacturing processes. For researchers and drug development professionals, this translates the abstract goal of "green chemistry" into measurable, comparable, and optimizable metrics, supporting decisions that align economic objectives with ecological responsibility.

The core value of LCA lies in its comprehensive nature. Instead of focusing on a single environmental issue, it compels a multi-criteria perspective, preventing problem-shifting where an improvement in one area (e.g., reducing waste water) leads to a deterioration in another (e.g., increasing energy consumption) [64]. This holistic view is critical for the authentic "greenness" assessment of complex products like active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), where the environmental burden is often distributed across global supply chains. By quantifying impacts through distinct life cycle stages and multiple impact categories, LCA provides the foundational data that powers analytical green metrics, enabling a transition from qualitative claims to verifiable, strategic sustainability outcomes.

Established LCA Methodologies and Current Applications

The execution of a standardized Life Cycle Assessment is structured into four distinct but interdependent phases, as defined by the ISO 14040/14044 standards: Goal and Scope Definition, Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA), and Interpretation [64] [65]. This framework ensures that assessments are conducted consistently, are reproducible, and their limitations are clearly understood.

The Four Phases of LCA

• Phase 1: Goal and Scope Definition: This critical first step establishes the study's purpose, the intended audience, and the product system under investigation. A key output is the definition of the functional unit, which provides a quantified reference to which all inputs and outputs are normalized (e.g., "per kilogram of synthesized API" or "per million doses of a finished drug"). This ensures fair comparisons between alternatives. The scope defines the system boundaries, specifying which unit processes are included and which life cycle stages are assessed (e.g., cradle-to-gate for API synthesis or cradle-to-grave for a packaged pharmaceutical product) [65].
• Phase 2: Life Cycle Inventory (LCI): This is the data-collection heart of the LCA. It involves compiling and quantifying the inputs (e.g., energy, raw materials, reagents) and outputs (e.g., emissions to air/water/land, products, co-products) for each process within the system boundaries [64]. For pharmaceutical applications, this includes detailed data on solvent use, catalyst consumption, energy for heating/cooling/reactions, and waste generation from purification steps.
• Phase 3: Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA): Here, the inventory data is translated into potential environmental impacts. The LCI flows are assigned to specific impact categories and converted into common units via characterization factors. Core categories relevant to greenness metrics include Global Warming Potential (carbon footprint), resource depletion, water consumption, and ecotoxicity [64]. The result is a profile of impact scores that provides a multi-dimensional view of a product's environmental footprint.
• Phase 4: Interpretation: In this phase, findings from the inventory and impact assessment are combined and evaluated. The results are checked for completeness, sensitivity, and consistency to reach conclusions, explain limitations, and provide actionable recommendations to decision-makers [65]. This phase ensures that the LCA study answers the questions posed in the goal and scope.

Life Cycle Models and Their Research Applications

Depending on the goal of the study, different life cycle models can be employed, each defining a different system boundary for the assessment [65].

Table 1: Life Cycle Models and Their Applications in Greenness Assessment

Model	System Boundary	Primary Application in Research
Cradle-to-Gate	Raw material extraction → Factory gate	Most common for comparing synthetic routes and processes for chemicals and APIs; basis for Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) [65].
Cradle-to-Grave	Raw material extraction → Final disposal	Comprehensive assessment of finished pharmaceutical products, including patient use and disposal impacts.
Cradle-to-Cradle	Raw material extraction → Recycling/Reuse	Assessing circular economy approaches, such as solvent recovery systems or designing biodegradable excipients [65].
Gate-to-Gate	One specific value-added process	Focusing the assessment on a single, critical unit operation (e.g., a specific reaction step) within a larger synthesis [65].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the standardized process of conducting an LCA, from its inception to the final reporting, highlighting the iterative nature of the interpretation phase.

Quantitative Data and Comparative Analysis

Robust greenness assessment relies on quantitative data presented in a clear, comparable format. Life Cycle Assessment generates this data, enabling direct comparisons between products, processes, or materials. The following tables summarize key quantitative indicators and provide a comparative overview of different LCA approaches relevant to researchers.

Core Impact Category Metrics

LCA results are typically presented as a profile across multiple impact categories. The table below outlines some of the most critical metrics for carbon footprint and broader environmental assessment.

Table 2: Key Quantitative Metrics in Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)

Impact Category	Common Unit	Description & Relevance to Green Metrics	Example Experimental Data Source
Global Warming Potential (GWP)	kg CO₂-equivalent	Measures greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change. The central "carbon footprint" metric.	EDGAR report 2025: Global GHG emissions reached 53.2 Gt CO₂eq in 2024 [66].
Carbon Footprint per Capita	tonnes CO₂ per person	Represents average emissions per person, useful for contextualizing broader impacts.	Our World in Data: Global CO₂ emissions have stayed just below 5 tonnes per person for over a decade [67].
Resource Depletion (Fossil)	MJ, kg Sb-eq.	Quantifies the depletion of non-renewable resources, such as fossil fuels or minerals.	Derived from life cycle inventory of fossil fuel and mineral inputs.
Water Consumption	m³	Measures the volume of freshwater used and not returned to the source, critical for water-stressed regions.	Derived from life cycle inventory of water inputs across the supply chain.
Acidification Potential	kg SO₂-equivalent	Measures emissions that cause acid rain, which can damage ecosystems and buildings.	Calculated from inventory of SO₂, NOx, and NH₃ emissions.

Comparative Analysis of LCA Types

Different research questions and stages of development call for different LCA approaches. The table below compares their core characteristics, data requirements, and primary outputs.

Table 3: Comparison of Retrospective and Prospective LCA Approaches

Feature	Retrospective (Conventional) LCA	Prospective (p)LCA
Temporal Focus	Past and present industrial systems [68].	Future-oriented, assessing emerging technologies still under development [68].
Primary Goal	Documenting the environmental profile of an existing, mature system.	Informing R&D by identifying potential environmental hotspots and improvement opportunities early in the design phase [68].
Technology Maturity	Established, commercially available technology.	Low Technology Readiness Level (TRL), often at laboratory or pilot scale [68].
Data Availability & Quality	Relies on empirical, high-quality operational data.	Faces challenges of data scarcity; uses modeling, scenarios, and extrapolations from lab-scale data [68].
Key Challenges	Allocating impacts in multi-output processes; setting boundaries.	Accounting for future background systems (e.g., cleaner energy grids), scaling effects, and high uncertainty [68].
Main Output	A static snapshot of environmental impacts.	A range of potential future impacts under different scenarios, supporting resilient R&D decisions [68].

Emerging Trends and Future Directions

The field of Life Cycle Assessment is dynamically evolving to better address the needs of decision-support, particularly for emerging technologies and within stringent sustainability policy contexts. The most significant advancements are occurring in Prospective LCA (pLCA), spatiotemporal differentiation, and integration with other analytical models.

The Rise of Prospective LCA (pLCA)

For researchers developing new chemical entities or novel manufacturing processes (e.g., biocatalysis, continuous flow chemistry, or fermentation-based API production), conventional retrospective LCA is of limited use. Prospective LCA (pLCA) is rapidly gaining interest as an essential methodology for evaluating the future potential environmental impacts of emerging technologies that are not yet fully developed or commercialized [68]. The core challenge of pLCA is to account for the evolution of both the foreground system (the technology itself, which will mature and scale up) and the background system (the larger economy, e.g., the future energy grid which is expected to decarbonize) [68]. Future directions involve creating robust prospective life cycle inventory (pLCI) databases and developing systematic scenario development techniques to model these changes credibly. This allows R&D teams to perform "eco-design," steering innovation towards genuinely more sustainable pathways from the outset.

Enhanced Modeling of Background Systems and Uncertainty

A key frontier in pLCA is the explicit integration of future scenarios related to the transformation of energy, material, transport, and industrial systems. Studies show that incorporating such scenarios can significantly influence LCA outcomes, making them more reliable and meaningful for long-term planning [68]. Concurrently, there is a strong push to improve the handling of uncertainty inherent in forecasting. This includes better quantification of uncertainty from scaling effects, data gaps, and the complex interlinkages between climate change itself and various other impact categories [68]. Future research is focused on developing future-oriented characterization factors that reflect a changing environment (e.g., different water availability or soil quality) and on enhancing the applicability of pLCA through integration with other analytical tools and models, such as energy system models and techno-economic assessments.

The following diagram visualizes the evolution from a static, retrospective LCA model to a dynamic, future-oriented prospective LCA framework.

Experimental Protocols and the Researcher's Toolkit

The credibility of any LCA study, and by extension the greenness metrics it informs, hinges on the rigor of its underlying experimental protocol and the quality of its data. This section outlines a generalized methodology for conducting an LCA suitable for comparing chemical processes or materials.

Detailed LCA Methodology for Process Comparison

Goal and Scope Definition Protocol:

• Functional Unit Definition: Clearly define the quantified performance unit that serves as the basis for comparison. For API synthesis, this is typically "1 kilogram of purified API with ≥99.5% purity."
• System Boundary Selection: Choose an appropriate model (cradle-to-gate is standard for process chemistry). Document all included and excluded processes with justification. For example, include raw material production, energy for reaction and purification, and waste treatment, but potentially exclude capital equipment manufacturing.
• Impact Category Selection: Select categories relevant to the AGREE metric context. Mandatory categories include Global Warming Potential (GWP100), Resource Depletion (fossil), and Water Consumption. Optional but recommended categories include Acidification and Ecotoxicity.

Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Compilation Protocol:

• Data Collection Sheet Creation: Develop a structured template for primary data from laboratory or pilot-scale experiments. This should capture mass and energy flows for each unit process: masses of all reactants, catalysts, and solvents; electricity for stirring and cooling; thermal energy for heating; and yields of product and by-products.
• Secondary Data Sourcing: For upstream processes (e.g., production of solvents, electricity generation), use reputable, peer-reviewed life cycle inventory databases such as Ecoinvent, GaBi, or the U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database. The specific database and version must be documented.
• Allocation Procedures: For multi-output processes (e.g., a reaction that produces a main product and a co-product), define and justify the allocation method (e.g., mass, economic, or system expansion via substitution).

Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) and Interpretation Protocol:

• Calculation and Normalization: Use dedicated LCA software (e.g., OpenLCA, SimaPro, GaBi) to calculate impact category scores. Results can be normalized to a reference value (e.g., global annual emissions per person) to understand their relative magnitude.
• Sensitivity Analysis: Test the influence of key assumptions and data uncertainties on the final results. For example, vary the source of electricity or the method of allocation to see how it affects the comparative ranking of alternatives.
• Critical Review: For studies intended for public disclosure (e.g., an EPD), an independent critical review by a panel of three external experts is required per ISO 14044 standards.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

In LCA for chemical research, specific materials and data sources function as essential "reagents" for constructing a reliable study.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Tools for Conducting an LCA

Item / Tool	Function in the LCA "Experiment"	Example & Key Characteristics
LCA Software Platform	The core tool for modeling the product system, managing inventory data, and performing impact calculations.	OpenLCA: An open-source software that allows for flexible modeling and is often used in academic research. SimaPro/GaBi: Commercial platforms with extensive integrated databases and well-established methodologies.
Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Database	Provides the secondary data on energy, materials, and transportation processes needed to model the background system.	Ecoinvent: A comprehensive, peer-reviewed database that is a global standard for LCA studies. USLCI: The U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database from NREL, which is publicly available.
Impact Assessment Method	The set of characterization factors that translate LCI data (e.g., kg of CO₂) into impact category scores (e.g., kg CO₂-eq for GWP).	ReCiPe: A widely used method that provides characterization factors for a broad set of impact categories at midpoint and endpoint levels. IPCC: The method from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for calculating Global Warming Potential.
Solvent & Chemical LCI Datasets	Provide the specific environmental loads associated with the production of key laboratory and industrial chemicals.	Datasets for common reagents (e.g., methanol, acetone, toluene) and catalysts (e.g., palladium on carbon) are critical for assessing synthetic routes. Data quality is paramount.
Primary Data Logging Tool	A standardized template (spreadsheet or electronic lab notebook) for consistently recording mass and energy flows from laboratory experiments.	A custom-designed template that captures inputs (masses, energies) and outputs (product mass, waste streams) for each unit operation, ensuring data integrity for the LCI.
Uncertainty Analysis Tool	Software functions or plugins used to quantify and propagate uncertainty through the LCA model.	Integrated tools in SimaPro/OpenLCA for Monte Carlo simulation, which helps determine the statistical significance of the differences between compared alternatives.

Conclusion

The AGREE metric represents a significant advancement in standardizing and quantifying the greenness of analytical methods, providing researchers with a crucial tool to align laboratory practices with sustainability goals. By offering a comprehensive, flexible, and visually intuitive assessment based on all 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry, AGREE enables informed decision-making in method selection and development. For biomedical and clinical research, the integration of AGREE with functional performance metrics like BAGI and RAPI through the White Analytical Chemistry framework ensures methods are not only environmentally sound but also analytically robust and practical. Future developments will likely focus on reducing assessment subjectivity, incorporating carbon footprint calculations, and expanding lifecycle considerations, further solidifying AGREE's role in promoting sustainable science.

References

• 1. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095177924001102]
• 2. Green Analytical Chemistry: Sustainable Methods and ... [https://www.labmanager.com/green-analytical-chemistry-sustainable-methods-and-practices-34268]
• 3. Green Analytical Chemistry—Recent Innovations [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4532/6/1/10]
• 4. The 12 principles of green and the... | Scilit analytical chemistry [https://www.scilit.com/publications/a35a7575e623c68a12bd07f719640495]
• 5. Assessing the Environmental Impact of Analytical Methods [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/the-green-component-assessing-the-environmental-impact-of-analytical-methods]
• 6. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697060/]
• 7. A Perspective on Current and Future Metric Tools - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12590457/]
• 8. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318332/]
• 9. Emerging Tools for Holistic Evaluation of Analytical Methods [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/emerging-tools-for-holistic-evaluation-of-analytical-methods]
• 10. Red analytical performance index (RAPI) and software [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d4gc05298f]
• 11. Green metrics and green analytical applications [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000685]
• 12. Tools to Evaluate the Eco-efficiency of Analytical Methods ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37877508/]
• 13. Application of new green evaluation tools to assess the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000533]
• 14. greenness assessment of HPLC methods for paclitaxel [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44371-025-00166-3]
• 15. Comparing the Greenness and Validation Metrics of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11137692/]
• 16. Masterful ecofriendly maintainable spectrophotometric ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ay/d5ay00159e]
• 17. AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588019/]
• 18. A Tutorial on AGREEprep an Analytical Greenness Metric ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582022000225]
• 19. Greenness and whiteness assessment of a sustainable ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-61712-0]
• 20. Comparison of the Greenness Assessment ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4532/4/4/32]
• 21. AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/AGREE%E2%80%94Analytical-GREEnness-Metric-Approach-and-Pena-Pereira-Wojnowski/e37816d022bde63c4e6f7ff66d06380945d78720]
• 22. Analytical chemistry in the era of sustainability: evaluating ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158825000182]
• 23. Green Approaches in High-Performance Liquid ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12430196/]
• 24. Abstract - RSC Publishing [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ra/d5ra05464h]
• 25. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209517792500019X]
• 26. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40756999/]
• 27. HPLC Method Validation for the Quantitative Fast ... [https://www.longdom.org/open-access/hplc-method-validation-for-the-quantitative-fast-determination-of-8-organic-uvfilters-in-products-with-a-level-of-sun-protection-f-63257.html]
• 28. HPLC 2025 Preview: The Road To Sustainable Analytical ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/hplc-2025-preview-the-road-to-sustainable-analytical-chemistry]
• 29. Greenness assessment of UPLC/MS/MS method for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-46636-5]
• 30. Development and Validation of a LC-MS/MS Method for ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40792418/]
• 31. Green and White Analytical Chemistry [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40998048/]
• 32. Greenness Assessment of Chromatographic Methods ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/9/10/275]
• 33. Comparative statistical evaluation of greenness, blueness ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-96091-7]
• 34. Greenness, blueness, and whiteness evaluation of a ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12053856/]
• 35. Greenness assessment and comparison of the developed ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026265X24013237]
• 36. Green Drug Discovery: Novel Fragment Space from the ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/4/1777]
• 37. Sustainable drug discovery using Green Chemistry [https://www.astrazeneca.com/content/astraz/what-science-can-do/topics/sustainability/sustainable-drug-discovery-using-green-chemistry.html]
• 38. A Comprehensive Review On The Miniaturized Analytical ... [https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjops/article=2025/view=232774/]
• 39. Sustainable Practices in HPLC: The Role of Miniaturization [https://www.technologynetworks.com/analysis/blog/sustainable-practices-in-hplc-the-role-of-miniaturization-397467]
• 40. Estimation of micro-extraction process hippuric acid for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12343877/]
• 41. Advances in Miniaturized Liquid Chromatography for the ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/12/11/312]
• 42. Innovations in Liquid Chromatography: 2025 HPLC ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/innovations-in-liquid-chromatography-2025-hplc-column-and-accessories-review]
• 43. HPLC 2025 Preview: On The Road With Your ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/hplc-2025-preview-on-the-road-with-your-chromatograph-]
• 44. Curated mode-of-action data and effect concentrations for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-023-02904-7]
• 45. Greenness metrics for analytical methodologies linked to ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000491]
• 46. AGREEprep – Analytical greenness metric for sample ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016599362200036X]
• 47. AGREEAnalytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://acs.figshare.com/collections/AGREE_Analytical_GREEnness_Metric_Approach_and_Software/5045160]
• 48. Agreeprep – Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample ... [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3985477]
• 49. Scientists Use Analytical GREEnness Metric to Test for ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/scientists-use-analytical-greenness-metric-to-test-for-antibiotics-in-food-samples]
• 50. White Analytical Chemistry: Balancing Performance ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/white-analytical-chemistry-balancing-performance-sustainability-and-practicality-in-modern-methods]
• 51. MA tool—Multi-color assessment platform for white ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026265X25021290]
• 52. Guidelines on the proper selection of greenness and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003267025004465]
• 53. Assessment of greenness, blueness, and whiteness profiles of ... [https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13065-024-01377-y]
• 54. Green and white analytical approach for parallel ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12185713/]
• 55. Green and white analytical approach for parallel ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-07056-9]
• 56. Violet Innovation Grade Index (VIGI): A New Survey-Based ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131222/]
• 57. Green analytical chemistry: integrating sustainability into ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-024-05680-4]
• 58. Advances in Green Analytical Techniques for Impurity ... [https://jyoungpharm.org/10.5530/jyp.20250075]
• 59. the new drift to assess practicality in (green) bioanalysis [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11581148/]
• 60. Evaluation of Greenness of LC-MS Chromatographic ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/9/6/147]
• 61. AGREEAnalytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/AGREE_Analytical_GREEnness_Metric_Approach_and_Software/12588771?backTo=/collections/AGREE_Analytical_GREEnness_Metric_Approach_and_Software/5045160]
• 62. Multi-criteria decision analysis: technique for order of ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-024-32961-3]
• 63. Greenness assessment of microextraction techniques in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11216521/]
• 64. Life Cycle Assessment: The ultimate expert guide to LCA in ... [https://p6technologies.com/lca/]
• 65. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) – Everything you need to know [https://ecochain.com/blog/life-cycle-assessment-lca-guide/]
• 66. GHG emissions of all world countries - 2025 Report [https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2025]
• 67. CO₂ emissions per capita [https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita]
• 68. Recent advancements in prospective life cycle assessment [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916125000155]